Re: Agg rule opinions
#11I will be short - i like new rules how it is.
Warrior 180+
Druid 155+
Epona
Druid 155+
Epona
Re: Agg rule opinions
#12But 135 1roll/140 2 roll is good for push ppl to reach 140Fairness is an objective concept having to do with input/output.135 1 roll
140 2roll
Its fair its clean
140 have an advantage and 135 have a chance
If a 135 is doing 25% of his damage and getting 1 roll, fairness would dictate that a 140 gets 2 rolls (50% damage), a 145 gets 3 rolls (75% damage), and a 150+ gets 4 rolls (100% damage). (this formula based off tests by Alexxx)
This was weighed a bit and most people wanted 1 roll period for 140+ so that it makes the roll period after faster, fairer, and cleaner. I think this was kinda based off the common rules people were making for other bosses. Such as if you wanted to fight Pyrus the Lavalord (lvl 125) most people want you to be at least level 115 to join a group, and then when the loot drops you have an equal chance no matter if you were level 115 or 135.
I actually came up with the multiple roll concept a long time ago but I think people don't like it much anymore.
I think there's a problem that this debate is all about an endgame loot boss that has nothing to do with any quests. Does anybody care that high levels farm Falgren, a quest boss, and don't let lower levels in? Its pretty much the same principle if not moreso important.
They do aggra 1 time with 1 roll and they want 2 roll for have 2x more chance to get it
Re: Agg rule opinions
#13All this clan drama...
People may make stereotypes of a clan.
I'm considering going clanless for a while. Of course I'd rather stay in a clan but the arguments about "Aggragoth rules" have to be settled.
I would like the people at the boss to interpret the rules whether it's a loose interpretation or a strict one.
Only like 5% of Epona is on the forums so you can't just let forum people decide on the rules.
In my honest opinion, I think the rules shouldn't be set in stone.
Just leave them as a general rule to follow. It would alleviate a lot of tension between people, between clans.
If people don't follow the rules too strictly, what harm will it do?
People may make stereotypes of a clan.
I'm considering going clanless for a while. Of course I'd rather stay in a clan but the arguments about "Aggragoth rules" have to be settled.
I would like the people at the boss to interpret the rules whether it's a loose interpretation or a strict one.
Only like 5% of Epona is on the forums so you can't just let forum people decide on the rules.
In my honest opinion, I think the rules shouldn't be set in stone.
Just leave them as a general rule to follow. It would alleviate a lot of tension between people, between clans.
If people don't follow the rules too strictly, what harm will it do?
Re: Agg rule opinions
#14Not having rules set in stone entitles the higher levels to let their clan get rolls and exclude others
Just one example
Just one example
Z z z!Silence! z z Z
Re: Agg rule opinions
#15Then let it be set in...plastic.Not having rules set in stone entitles the higher levels to let their clan get rolls and exclude others
Just one example
Re: Agg rule opinions
#16My opinion. Nobody should be allowed to kill aggragoth.
Re: Agg rule opinions
#17Honestly may not be my place to speak but...
All these rules r bs. Everyone should get 1 roll no matter ur damn lvl. Why should 140s get 2 rules rolls meanwhile 5 lvls lower u get less of a chance. Also why not just let 130s in bcuz i forgot you high lvls were special and didnt have any 130s at aggy fight number 1. This is my opinion.
All these rules r bs. Everyone should get 1 roll no matter ur damn lvl. Why should 140s get 2 rules rolls meanwhile 5 lvls lower u get less of a chance. Also why not just let 130s in bcuz i forgot you high lvls were special and didnt have any 130s at aggy fight number 1. This is my opinion.
Re: Agg rule opinions
#18Honestly may not be my place to speak but...
All these rules r bs. Everyone should get 1 roll no matter ur damn lvl. Why should 140s get 2 rules rolls meanwhile 5 lvls lower u get less of a chance. Also why not just let 130s in bcuz i forgot you high lvls were special and didnt have any 130s at aggy fight number 1. This is my opinion.
Cuz thats the only way these greedies would acsept the plan...?>.>
Ashley A - Mabon - Novalis - 222 - Mage
Azona - Mabon - Novalis - 209 - Druid
0x15 - Mabon - Novalis - 216 - Rogue
Allymia - Epona - 220 - Rogue
Fire Mage - Epona - 220 - Mage
Aethinry Donn - Belenus - 221 - Warrior
Dakara - Belenus - 200 - Mage
Azona - Mabon - Novalis - 209 - Druid
0x15 - Mabon - Novalis - 216 - Rogue
Allymia - Epona - 220 - Rogue
Fire Mage - Epona - 220 - Mage
Aethinry Donn - Belenus - 221 - Warrior
Dakara - Belenus - 200 - Mage
Re: Agg rule opinions
#19true dat.Honestly may not be my place to speak but...
All these rules r bs. Everyone should get 1 roll no matter ur damn lvl. Why should 140s get 2 rules rolls meanwhile 5 lvls lower u get less of a chance. Also why not just let 130s in bcuz i forgot you high lvls were special and didnt have any 130s at aggy fight number 1. This is my opinion.
Cuz thats the only way these greedies would acsept the plan...?>.>
Re: Agg rule opinions
#20Alpha this does not concern you what so ever, this is something that is not so simple and if we could do it that way we would- the rolls depend on the tank now.true dat.Honestly may not be my place to speak but...
All these rules r bs. Everyone should get 1 roll no matter ur damn lvl. Why should 140s get 2 rules rolls meanwhile 5 lvls lower u get less of a chance. Also why not just let 130s in bcuz i forgot you high lvls were special and didnt have any 130s at aggy fight number 1. This is my opinion.
Cuz thats the only way these greedies would acsept the plan...?>.>
Z z z!Silence! z z Z