Celtic Heroes

Nahhh go back to morrigon. jk so basically you vote for crusher's option

How I understood Crusher's option is that there would be one roll per item. If there are 2 books and 3 rogues, there would be two rolls. The winner of first roll doesn't get to roll a second time. Different from what I said I think.

Anyway, just thought I'd give input. Never really been a fan of random loot distribution, but I can see how it's needed for pick up groups or server wide clans.

Nahhh go back to morrigon. jk so basically you vote for crusher's option

How I understood Crusher's option is that there would be one roll per item. If there are 2 books and 3 rogues, there would be two rolls. The winner of first roll doesn't get to roll a second time. Different from what I said I think.

Anyway, just thought I'd give input. Never really been a fan of random loot distribution, but I can see how it's needed for pick up groups or server wide clans.

How you said it is how we always roll.

The thing is there are 2 drops one already given out.

Everyone attended for the class there GETS a roll for the drop that went to a different class. If everyone from that class is in group and they get a drop for that class when they are that class they got to keep no roll. But for the other drop everyone there still gets a roll as by the rules.

By your example dr pepper you say the game rolls the first time, so the second dice roll is a different roll thats why everyone gets a roll not only the rogue that didnt get a drop yet.

By excluding the other rogue you break the rules... Yeah he can get 2 drops that way but it would have been the same way other way around.

Not from epona but allow me add my input. The only thing that matters is you have rules and stick to them.

In this case, lets say you let the rogue that got a drop keep it and the other rogue got the other drop. If in a seperate but similar scenario, it was handled differently and the tank re rolled both drops, the person who was at the previous kill may feel cheated If he had to hand in his drop just because someone wanted another chance to roll for the better drop. This opens up the chance for players with 'higher status' to suit each scenario for their own needs. Hope that made sense.

Not from epona but allow me add my input. The only thing that matters is you have rules and stick to them.

In this case, lets say you let the rogue that got a drop keep it and the other rogue got the other drop. If in a seperate but similar scenario, it was handled differently and the tank re rolled both drops, the person who was at the previous kill may feel cheated If he had to hand in his drop just because someone wanted another chance to roll for the better drop. This opens up the chance for players with 'higher status' to suit each scenario for their own needs. Hope that made sense.

Rules for edl drops are:

- drop go by class, you can call class at boss if your alt is the right lvl
- class roll only
- if everyone of the same class is in the group and they get the drop for that class they get to keep
- everyone attended gets to roll for the drop of their class if dropped on the wrong class, or on right class but not wveryone in lock group.
- if no one there for that class everyone rolls

So both rogues get to roll for the ench and the first rogue gets to keep the sumoning.

Yup and the way it is now without a proper rule for this situation, there will be fighting over how to do it.

Each system is fine by me and will be fair since everyone goes by these same rules, we just have to decide which one and make it very clear that this is what happens in this situation no matter what so no one will protest for another way of it being done when it suits them. It doesn't happen often but does happen still and don't want some massive drama when it does.

Not from epona but allow me add my input. The only thing that matters is you have rules and stick to them.

In this case, lets say you let the rogue that got a drop keep it and the other rogue got the other drop. If in a seperate but similar scenario, it was handled differently and the tank re rolled both drops, the person who was at the previous kill may feel cheated If he had to hand in his drop just because someone wanted another chance to roll for the better drop. This opens up the chance for players with 'higher status' to suit each scenario for their own needs. Hope that made sense.

Rules for edl drops are:

- drop go by class, you can call class at boss if your alt is the right lvl
- class roll only
- if everyone of the same class is in the group and they get the drop for that class they get to keep
- everyone attended gets to roll for the drop of their class if dropped on the wrong class, or on right class but not wveryone in lock group.
- if no one there for that class everyone rolls

So both rogues get to roll for the ench and the first rogue gets to keep the sumoning.

All is fair as long as every kill is handled the same and follow these rules, no one should feel cheated that way

Not from epona but allow me add my input. The only thing that matters is you have rules and stick to them.

In this case, lets say you let the rogue that got a drop keep it and the other rogue got the other drop. If in a seperate but similar scenario, it was handled differently and the tank re rolled both drops, the person who was at the previous kill may feel cheated If he had to hand in his drop just because someone wanted another chance to roll for the better drop. This opens up the chance for players with 'higher status' to suit each scenario for their own needs. Hope that made sense.

Rules for edl drops are:

- drop go by class, you can call class at boss if your alt is the right lvl
- class roll only
- if everyone of the same class is in the group and they get the drop for that class they get to keep
- everyone attended gets to roll for the drop of their class if dropped on the wrong class, or on right class but not wveryone in lock group.
- if no one there for that class everyone rolls

So both rogues get to roll for the ench and the first rogue gets to keep the sumoning.

- everyone attended gets to roll for the drop of their class if dropped on the wrong class, or on right class but not everyone* in lock group.

Where did you find those rules? Looks typed out to me instead of copy pasted.

Nahhh go back to morrigon. jk so basically you vote for crusher's option

How I understood Crusher's option is that there would be one roll per item. If there are 2 books and 3 rogues, there would be two rolls. The winner of first roll doesn't get to roll a second time. Different from what I said I think.

Anyway, just thought I'd give input. Never really been a fan of random loot distribution, but I can see how it's needed for pick up groups or server wide clans.

How you said it is how we always roll.

The thing is there are 2 drops one already given out.

Everyone attended for the class there GETS a roll for the drop that went to a different class. If everyone from that class is in group and they get a drop for that class when they are that class they got to keep no roll. But for the other drop everyone there still gets a roll as by the rules.

By your example dr pepper you say the game rolls the first time, so the second dice roll is a different roll thats why everyone gets a roll not only the rogue that didnt get a drop yet.

By excluding the other rogue you break the rules... Yeah he can get 2 drops that way but it would have been the same way other way around.

Uh no, thats completely different from what I said.

IMO Its unfair one rogue gets both drops Its also unfair that a rogue who gets a purple drop gets stuck with it, especially if the other is a better drop.

go cry mama greek... camp your edl like we all do and earn it..
kindest regards,
~Exe~

your friend and helper

go cry mama greek... camp your edl like we all do and earn it..
kindest regards,
~Exe~

your friend and helper

Lol. Someone is very mad.