Celtic Heroes

The Official Forum for Celtic Heroes, the 3D MMORPG for iOS and Android Devices

Re: warrior accord

#11
Sounds like a great idea akbar , but that being said i might be near the top of the list so i feel it a bit unfair me saying yes lets do it :) I do agree though it would speed things up for all in general less stuff sat there doing nothing.
Image

Re: warrior accord

#12
i suspect most clans do coordinate within their own clan. Our clan is working to help callu, and as indicated, other clans are doing similar. My guess is that there are a lot of crowns out there cause all these warriors are close.

On the question of weapon vs. offhand - at this point, for a warrior, i think the offhand is more important if the goal is mordris. We need classes to play to their strengths, so in my opinion, getting the offhand and being a super tank (with decent damage) is what we need from warriors at the mordris fight. we have rangers, rogues, and mages to supply dps.

that is only my opinion, it is really up to warriors to prioritize who gets what and in what order - assuming they can all join together to cooperate.

As someone with the offhand though, i can tell you it makes a really noticeable difference against chaos bosses. my guess is that, at least for rangers - two rangers with dl bows will not be as useful as one ranger with offhand and the other with bone bow. There are obviously a lot of factors, but my dmg with the offhand skill is ridiculously high.

thanks
Civility, Integrity, and the Hermeneutic of Generosity

World: Lugh
Akbar: Ranger 220+
DrXyn-Druid 180+
Xyn: Mage 170+
Rabka: Rogue 150+
Rabak: Warrior 90+
Clan: Chieftain of Ancients

Re: warrior accord

#13
Hi Ak!
Truly, i cant understand what post. Plan - to make a list of warriors from 185 to highest one, and then give all crowns to person who is on top.
i have few questions then:
1. how many crowns? so top warrior will get crowns for weapon only or offhand too?
2. what for example for people already with weapon?
3. why only warriors? why not all classes?
4. dont u think that ppl will stop camping?

I dont think that idea is good. Also our chief has long vacation.

Better make rule for ppl with dl not to take drops they dont need. would be much usefull.

General DaftPunk
BERSERKERS

Re: warrior accord

#14
@daft, the list wouldnt necessarily just go in order of level - i would imaging no clan would have 2 warriors in a row. The idea was that if we have lots of warriors with 2 or 3 crowns and now wep/offhand, that by combining their resources, we could start getting people DL. Mages and Rangers have been doing this quite a bit. I dont know about rogues and druids, but i think they have too.

Personally, i dont care much as it wont affect me. Sure, Mordris may have to wait a bit, but im ok with that. But since everyone keeps complaining to me as though i have the ability to get everyone crowns, i figured i would suggest something that might help the group of warriors.

also, under this plan, not every warrior would have to participate necessarily for this to work. Any group of warriors can make a pact. The more who join, the more successful it will be.

Nothing here has any implication on dicing or who gets drops.

as for your questions, i have no answers (except the bit about other classes - they already do this, though somewhat informally) - but they are good questions and the kinds of things that warriors need to discuss if they are interested. If the warriors cannot agree, then it is not a workable idea.

As for shadow being on vacation, i would guess the warrior generals of berserkers could handle the 'negotiations' if you like the idea.

make sense?
Civility, Integrity, and the Hermeneutic of Generosity

World: Lugh
Akbar: Ranger 220+
DrXyn-Druid 180+
Xyn: Mage 170+
Rabka: Rogue 150+
Rabak: Warrior 90+
Clan: Chieftain of Ancients

Re: warrior accord

#15
Also will be interesting fact with lvling, cause still some warriors continue to lvl up. Snorri dropping reds rare enough and it will be a little confusion. Even In the interval between 2 crowns person can lvl up and replace someone in list or the other way person who is not lvling but 185+ can wait for his crowns forever.

Re: warrior accord

#17
good points, all need to be worked out and agreed upon for the system to work.

What i have suggested is simply a framework and concept for creating a cooperative system. i do not expect to have any role in the actual implementation or rules regarding such system. that is for the warriors and clans interested.
Civility, Integrity, and the Hermeneutic of Generosity

World: Lugh
Akbar: Ranger 220+
DrXyn-Druid 180+
Xyn: Mage 170+
Rabka: Rogue 150+
Rabak: Warrior 90+
Clan: Chieftain of Ancients

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests