Celtic Heroes

I think DM should pick a random #
who ev is closest to that # wins
So its not the highest nor the lowest #

I hate to admit it, but this is actually a great idea for complete randomness. If dice are completely random as people say, adding another layer of a random number to it will only compound on it and remove any risk with consistent high or low rolls. In fact, if you want to make it even more random, have the dm roll and whatever number that shows that is the number people have to get close to.

Cudos to you 8.

I think DM should pick a random #
who ev is closest to that # wins
So its not the highest nor the lowest #

this is a good input 8, tysm!

problem here let us say i chose 75
someone rolls 74 and another 76 who wins?
plus If DM chooses then it kinda puts the person on the spot. better dm roll dice than choose him or herself imo.

choosing highest and lowest is more random, imo. for those who argue its a hassle it takes a few seconds. well, i guess everything that is new takes getting used to. try to get in your heads this...who benefits from this??? NOBODY...just makin dicing more random to avoid speculations of spiking or loading. those who have brighter ideas put em on the table, let us talk.

I think DM should pick a random #
who ev is closest to that # wins
So its not the highest nor the lowest #

this is a good input 8, tysm!

problem here let us say i chose 75
someone rolls 74 and another 76 who wins?
plus If DM chooses then it kinda puts the person on the spot. better dm roll dice than choose him or herself imo.

choosing highest and lowest is more random, imo. for those who argue its a hassle it takes a few seconds. well, i guess everything that is new takes getting used to. try to get in your heads this...who benefits from this??? NOBODY...just makin dicing more random to avoid speculations of spiking or loading. those who have brighter ideas put em on the table, let us talk.

What if you get 74 or 76? Same thing that happens when you get 99, one off the number you're trying to get so it's a tie.
It'd be fun to do closest without going over and if all go over then closest wins.

+1 lowest roll wins,i like this idea . LOWEST ROLL WINS THE DROP FTW. So far i only won 2 times lost 50 times

I think DM should pick a random #
who ev is closest to that # wins
So its not the highest nor the lowest #

this is a good input 8, tysm!

problem here let us say i chose 75
someone rolls 74 and another 76 who wins?
plus If DM chooses then it kinda puts the person on the spot. better dm roll dice than choose him or herself imo.

choosing highest and lowest is more random, imo. for those who argue its a hassle it takes a few seconds. well, i guess everything that is new takes getting used to. try to get in your heads this...who benefits from this??? NOBODY...just makin dicing more random to avoid speculations of spiking or loading. those who have brighter ideas put em on the table, let us talk.

What if you get 74 or 76? Same thing that happens when you get 99, one off the number you're trying to get so it's a tie.
It'd be fun to do closest without going over and if all go over then closest wins.

ahhhhhhhh! makes sense! interesting! then this could be it then. dm rolls first? then closest to it wins...oooooh this is excellent then 8! makes it very random then.

ty vult for clarification.

I think DM should pick a random #
who ev is closest to that # wins
So its not the highest nor the lowest #

this is a good input 8, tysm!

problem here let us say i chose 75
someone rolls 74 and another 76 who wins?
plus If DM chooses then it kinda puts the person on the spot. better dm roll dice than choose him or herself imo.

choosing highest and lowest is more random, imo. for those who argue its a hassle it takes a few seconds. well, i guess everything that is new takes getting used to. try to get in your heads this...who benefits from this??? NOBODY...just makin dicing more random to avoid speculations of spiking or loading. those who have brighter ideas put em on the table, let us talk.

What if you get 74 or 76? Same thing that happens when you get 99, one off the number you're trying to get so it's a tie.
It'd be fun to do closest without going over and if all go over then closest wins.

Although I like the idea this will be very difficult to handle. with 20+ rolls u will have to go through the numbers and find the two closes numbers. It will be difficult to do fast, as number screen will roll with people talking. and the chance of missing a number of miscalulating althou simple math is there. Its to complex for big rolls.

+1 for the idea
-10 for complexity

I like 8's idea the most it seemed the most reasonable.
The 50- ad 50+ one I'm personally allergic to it because I don't encourage dicing in castle and I keep hearing people shout these numbers I have no idea how they play these castle games but I keep hearing stories about people getting scammed from them, so it left a bad impression and if we do this then we are encouraging castle dicing and I hope we don't go towards that direction. The other reason why I don't favor the 50+ dicing is that I heard some players say it gives advantage to the dm, I'm not sure if it's true but if he gets to roll twice well maybe true then. Unless we bring a dm who wasn't at the fight and won't roll which is not realistic or practical.
I hope the o8o new dicing method gets applied, so that the haters and jealous people stop bullying players who win. I keep hearing the word "hack" and I just wonder why Lugh players don't seem to understand that CH cannot be hacked. Some players seriously started going delusional with their fever that winners hack and load and what not, the new dicing method gets everybody back to earth and makes them stop the unhealthy hallucinations. I think that not even the biggest hackers in the world can hack CH. period.
I'm personally one of the people who win at dicing, not the items that I need and like DevilDave said, when he got accused of hacking dice, he won't be winning on a silly energy harvest skull and lose on a nature's touch skull, if it was true that he hacks. Same like in my case, I play my rogue the most since my warrior retired a long time ago, for the lack of need of tanks in Lugh, If I was to hack dice, I would have won by now a rogue set, which is either Frostroot set or Bloodthorn set. I won none, while I was present at the fights where all the necklaces for those 2 sets dropped.
I'm not the only person who wins, there's many other friends who win a lot and get bullied and trolled for winning, many on other servers too where I often play.
I was asked how I win what do I do for winning. Well, I don't load dice I don't spike dice, i don't go in a corner and dice infinitely. Maybe that's how I win? I just dice when I'm asked to dice. i don't abuse dice button. Maybe lots of people in Lugh should try it some time, try not to load your dice or spike it, and you will see yourself winning, I'm pretty sure. Simply dice when you are asked to dice. It does wonders. trust me.
There's also cases where some players won a few mordris spears helms, godly rings braces, some casters won around 5 books as well. these people never get addressed as hackers, it's ridiculous. I had to buy my Mordris spear for 2 million gold, my boyriend gave me his Mordris helm, haven't won any myself except a silly focus level 180 spear.
I think the reason behind the hatred is that we live in a patriarchal society that has so much misogyny lying inside its webs, we see a successful female player on her own, not in a major clan who defends her, not with a man who fights for her, and we decide to intimidate her, bash her, corner her and humiliate her. While we let the people we favor win constantly and we dance and say super grats when they keep winning over and over. It's simply human nature. Unfortunately. There's also the age difference, i often find myself getting bashed by a teenager who doesn't understand he age difference. They see all our characters look the same so they think that I have to stoop down to the level of a teen and think like them talk like them and get my head so small into matters I don't usually think of in real life. Imagine the biggest quarrel I have to go through in real life is with my university professors about whether Gilles Deleuze or Jacques Lacan helped this century better in the post modern philosophical thinking, while on CH I have to spend my time convincing a teen that dice cannot be hacked. smh. This is a major age difference clash which many adults have to put up with on CH.

see ADULTS can share inputs! yay to that!

to make it clear this ain't no REYTCH RULE as some would claim. i just got balls to share what i think of and be open to feedback about it. Unlike others who just yap and shares on the victory for boss kills, some people do use their heads to think and come up of things to better the server...have you ever heard of six sigma?

instead of hurling insults and giving me snarl comments post a reply here. btw u call me a biotch in public? look urself in the mirror dear! LOL like really...i do not have to cuss or insult no one to argue, college thought me that. stooping down low ain't my game. get urself checked. instead of involving urself on things u don't really contribute on busy urself helping ur clan out so they don't go begging for stuff ur selling at shouts. i personally did not get any help from u so do not go waving all the crowns ur saying u won and loaned out. that is the main reason why we did not want ur help at all. u do one little thing and u broadcast to the entire world what u did. that's helping alright...humility way much better than that...way better, shows ur true color, a hint of what kind of a person u are irl.

My only concern with complete random number is how is that set, if dm rolls to get the number it's a bit unfair on him/her can't say I've rolled the same number twice in a row ever.

I like o8o's idea a lot, but, as LadyB said, with all those rolls in a row, it would be difficult to see quickly who won. So, I'd say +1 to lowest/highest wins, way easier