Celtic Heroes

If you lay it out like a colosium we could have a spectator gate aswell

How about 2 free for all and a team one team one has two gate which gate you use sets what team your on
The free for all would be one gate but drops you in at one of 20 locations just to stop gate campers add to this some level 50 boss type thing the king of the ring he drops a prize but it's a free for all so people can bump each other off while trying to kill the boss or just avoid him while he patrols the zone having something that wanders about will also stop the insta gib gate campers the boss drop thing would have to be good enough to temp players in but no so good that you get clans camping it I'd suggest an untradable ring or neccy like the tamlin sword quest good enough so people want it but untradable so they don't farm it
The team arena would need an objective kill the opposition or hold a zone till timer runs out
I would also suggest that game does not start until both teams r full say 7 or 10 a side have a number on have saying how many places r availible aswell don't want to sit there waiting for an entire opposite team to turn up
Plus you could end up with groups just using it as a chat room so a timer is a definite requirement

How will this stop people from gate camping cause wherever you get droped off at someone else is bound to be dropped there also you cant really stop gate campers without being able to distract them or defeat them i think gate campers are good it keeps the incapable people out.

All ideas sound really good. But if you allow potions too be used in pvp. Then it will be a epic fail. So no potions in pvp.. Please

I think there should be two: clan v clan and ffa.

Give the clan v clan a wider range of functions than just large scale clan v clan battles.

+1for an option of arenas, btw don't forget to put a lvl cap so a lvl 90 can't attack a lvl 40; unfair

Arenas? Admin this isint what I thought you meant when you said PvP.


I imagined, for example, my freind and I find eachother in lies reach, I click on him, and click the search button, then invite to a PvP battle right where we are, that's the best way to do it.



Also, I wanted an area in the game where EVERYONE is hostile, and if you can't Handel defeating at least one person in that area then you just arnt ready.


Please think about this World Of Midguard is going to be released sometime around when your update is released, that said, you really should think about this whole PvP situation Arenas are NOT the way to go.



(Unless of course it is a CLANvsCLAN which is COMPLETELY different than PvP for CvC I do want an Arena)

Hi there, in this update we have two forms of pvp, duels and arenas. In the next update we have large objective based pvp battlegrounds. The idea for this update is to test out and balance pvp before we expand it.

Duels: you click on a person and challenge them, if they accept you fight 1v1 until one person is the victor

Group arena: you can heal or buff people in your group, everyone else in the arena is hostile and can be attacked
Clan v Clan arena: you can heal or buff people in your clan, everyone else in the arena is hostile and can be attacked
Free for all arena: everyone is hostile and can be attacked

Since it's an open world game you will have to go to the arena to fight there, or go near the other player and challenge them to duel with them.

This is why I'm asking about issues relating to spreading out of players because it's not an instanced game where you click a button and all players appear in the same place to fight.

All ideas sound really good. But if you allow potions too be used in pvp. Then it will be a epic fail. So no potions in pvp.. Please

Why,

This is a retarted statement is it because you cant get potions? cause everyone can get easy potions with quests. Everything that you can utilize in game should be able to be used in pvp if you creat restrictions like that then more people will go rather than stay.

In pvp everyone wants an advantage over another its what makes them do pvp, haveing the fealing that if they had a second chance they could win a potion is a second chance.

and i like all the things you staed admin

I agree that pots will ruin pvp, since it will be a "whoever has the most money will win" instead "who puts most time and effort into the game".

Rather than 3 arenas, imo 2 areas are best: Free for all and groups.

Since Update 4 will bring an area for clan fights I don't see the need for an arena right now. Some servers don't have enough population for clan arenas imo. We sometimes only have a few people on and I for one would rather roam the free for all or group arena then the clan arena.

@Wizard: btw, WoM has been pushed back to June/July 2012.

@Nadnarb or whatever,



If anyone's statement in this post is dumb, it yours. Potions,Idols, and elixirs should be banned from PvP it's not fair and the clan with the richest people always wins. If someone has let's say a level 80 warrior with full warden vs a level 110 warrior with full meteoric (or whatever upgraded warden is called) and the level 80 has tons of pots and elixirs and idols well no doubt he will win, it would then be about money and not skill.

Now let's say someone used a super combination potion to level, then someone invites them to a PvP, the combination potions time should be set on hold and therefor nullified from the match. Simple as that.



As to the admin, thanks for your response, but I seem to still be confused, so this "Arena" is not an AREA where everyone is hostile? Like a map lets say lirs reach, everyone could be attacked? (obviously not lirs because of starters it was simply an example)

Let's be honest...

We have no idea what yer talking about, because how do we even know what an arena is???

Is it a room, is it a zone? Does it have different rocks and environmental ramps, is it the size of Castle Farcrag?
Is it the size of catacombs...

We have NOOOOO idea what your version of an ARENA is. We all have seen arenas in other game's and they have all been different. So how do we know what and how many we need?

I think if you want to ask a real question from the community, you need to give us real content to compare our responses with.

For example:

FFA ARENA QUESTIONS (Free for All)
In FFA it would make sense to make that no groups.
But if just solo v solo, does that mean a crash would set you out of arena, or would you log back in to the arena
Could people exploit that? Log out when about to die, log back in and heal up as the opponent has moved on??
If it's an arena match, wouldn't it make sense to set a time limit and if yer involved in the begining of the match the arena system saves yer name and let's you log back on and reenter the arena but if the match is started and you weren't there to start...you can't join?? My point is... What's to stop people from just manually disconnecting to save their K/D ratios??

Just solo v solo?
And if so how exactly does that work?
I mean it seems kinda bizarre and taking no skill, just like bumper cars where the only skill is the luck of staying alive or not being targeted..

GRP v GRP questions
Group v group is the prefer'd ideal, but will a group of 7 be fighting a group of 5, I.E will the gro size be 7 or will it be like 4 or 5 in an arena??? I think a smaller number would be easier to field in a clan or server and more fun to play with
I mean is it gonna be a zone where anyone in a group is in a FFA against all other groups?
Or is it 1 group vs 1 group??

Connectivity questions!! (these matter in terms of people voting for group arenas)
Does a crash or disconnect log you out of a bout?
If you disconnect in an arena can you not log back in??
Do you get kicked from arena? And kicked from match??

Clan v Clan?

What's to stop a clan of 500 people from just filling the arena and claiming victory?
Is there a clan max like 10 or 15 or 20 ppl to play against, making clan v clan be more a matter of tactics and skill than just I have more people so I am king??

You can't just drop this question in a shark tank of hungry people looking for answers and not back it up with some rational background info. To me that's just irresponsible.

Admin I don't know what to choose, bc I have no idea what yer talking about.