Celtic Heroes

If u have anything further to say @Pavi, I at least expect u to answer a single question of those I brought up.

Can you ask those questions again? I couldn't find them but I would like to answer them.

Yes having countless alts parked at hrung who locked in instantly when hrung spawned, triple devicing n sharing accounts and then exploiting the logic defying lock system to outlock a full group of much higher level players. That is preparedness. I say it is bullsh*it.

Smellyunder. Triple devicing is a skill set. Sharing accounts is against the rules. Surely your clan must understand that just as we do (or do you?). Camping a boss is an effort that can be embraced by all. You can't blame another's preparedness for the fault of your own. You must ask your clan to camp bosses with effort just as we have.

If u have anything further to say @Pavi, I at least expect u to answer a single question of those I brought up.

Can you ask those questions again? I couldn't find them but I would like to answer them.

Yes having countless alts parked at hrung who locked in instantly when hrung spawned, triple devicing n sharing accounts and then exploiting the logic defying lock system to outlock a full group of much higher level players. That is preparedness. I say it is bullsh*it.

Smellyunder. Triple devicing is a skill set. Sharing accounts is against the rules. Surely your clan must understand that just as we do (or do you?). Camping a boss is an effort that can be embraced by all. You can't blame another's preparedness for the fault of your own. You must ask your clan to camp bosses with effort just as we have.

Pav let's say u were doing aggy and a rival clan logged all their 150 alts and were not prepared at all and recklessly attacked and got lock over you guys, who were prepared but 180's. Would u still consider that fair?

Pavi is busy killing aggy atm that they locked due to lock flaw again, give him a few minutes.

Pav let's say u were doing aggy and a rival clan logged all their 150 alts and were not prepared at all and recklessly attacked and got lock over you guys, who were prepared but 180's. Would u still consider that fair?

What if I were to mention again the fact that we are a clan of 7 and we must reside to alts of different classes to resort to survival at any bossfights? Also not to mention that we've lost 5 Hrungs prior to this because we were admittedly unprepared? Resurgence was well prepared with 3 DPS groups camped at Hrung at a time. It is only when we've managed to catch them offguard that we were able to take this boss down.
What if I were to also remind you that those are the only bosses we're limited to at the moment due to both our levels and our size? Meanwhile the more higher leveled clan is taking on much more higher leveled bosses which ranges from 7-8 different varieties.

It was just an explanation of how this thread has progressed with you comparing Bada's members to Seed's members.

What? Did u even read any post? The hell I have to do with Seed? I dont know a single member of their clan.
Stop going off the main issue, ur always giving points that arent related even by a little to the issue presented by this thread, only in order to justify the lvl lock that used to not exist, yet ppl did just fine.
@Pavi, ur trying to picture me some perfect ideal clan that is only friendly and does everything for others, so far Ive seen ur side and it seemed cool, a good clan, while another side saying ur lying, Im rather torn.

I'll go back to my original comment, but instead of rewritting it I'll just quote it :

Speaking as an unbiased (clanwise) outside individual, it is wrong that if two clans are at a boss who need the drops (i.e. Dl bosses) or at a loot boss with gear useful to the higher levels (i.e. Hru) the higher leveled group should not be at a disadvantage in gaining items they need simply because they are a higher level. It is punishing people for playing the game to the "end"


Just as an example, a new player joins the game, plaus clanleas untill they are 200, looks to join anclan and when they do they need to be geared. Their clan now has to go up against lower levels who are going to outlock them when they need the drops too

This comment was just a perfect example to show that this lvl based lock is pointless and rather harmful.

@Pav, I think u dont get the most basic idea of this topic, yes, both dominant clan and their rival clans should enjoy all aspects of the game, but only if they put the same amount of effort.
The dominant clan is dominant because it worked hard to be that way, the rival clans these days barely work half as hard and simply get everything handed to them due easier lvl lock for example. Back at the day we had dominant and rival clans without this lock system, and they didnt complain about it, each clan knew that the more effort he'll put into it the stronger it'll become, while the lvl based lock system encourages putting less effort and still get even more rewarded.

Explain me the logic in less effort = bigger rewards, explain me the logic of lvl 220 not standing a chance vs a lvl 180, 40 lvls of difference, when the lvl 220 put a lot more effort in his character, worked harder and did much more, and the 180 just stopped lvling at 180 because he knew it'll give him the advantage.
If there is some common sense in it, maybe the argument in favor of target lock would be valid, but just like u expect the dominant clan to imagine being in ur shoes, trying doing the same, work harder than ur rivals and have less chances to win, then we'll see if ur still happy about 'fair' chance for everyone.


Its not Free-For-All if a certain group gets favored.

If u have anything further to say @Pavi, I at least expect u to answer a single question of those I brought up.