Celtic Heroes

Way things are now, rogues are in the same rut as warrs fro

If i may put in my 2 cents on this subject. I am in no way familiar with high level rogues, rangers or mages but i am a level 146 druid with a good grasp on the game. I have a level 70 rogue alt but he has access to my heroics, golden blade, golden helm of ice and warden. So leveling at the moment is in no way a problem. He's a beast. Anyways i think there's a combat aspect missing from Celtic Heroes that really needs to be implemented and has been mentioned in this thread. Critical hits! The chance that your auto attack or skill hit has chance to do 1.5-2x damage and rogues should be the masters of critical hits like they always have in almost all rpg's, even back to dungeons and dragons with their sneak attack ability. Implement critical hits and give rogues gear that has a percent chance that increases the likelihood of a Crit. Maybe even a passive skill that increases the chance. But also give rangers the same, seeing as thats what they do also, but dont make it as powerful as the rogues. That, in my opinion, is what will take rogues back into their rightful place as dps.
Also can work on spell crits for mages and druids.

Fro turning every post against warriors again.

By the way.. Ymirs AoE (something Swing.. Minds blank), hits my rogue for 1.3k+ in full frozen... I checked today and it hits my warrior clanny in full frozen for 700 MAX. That is a huge difference.

Also.. Not sure anyone has posted this in the past but Warrior Frozen gives a load of Physical attack Evasion.. Rogues (who take just as much), gives a load of wounding attack evasion (NOT NEEDED!!!).

Fro turning every post against warriors again.

By the way.. Ymirs AoE (something Swing.. Minds blank), hits my rogue for 1.3k+ in full frozen... I checked today and it hits my warrior clanny in full frozen for 700 MAX. That is a huge difference.

Also.. Not sure anyone has posted this in the past but Warrior Frozen gives a load of Physical attack Evasion.. Rogues (who take just as much), gives a load of wounding attack evasion (NOT NEEDED!!!).

Mmm i just was adding to donko comment about not training his warriors , because is useless and waste on his own words not mine. The original poster doesnt say i want make a warrior ask why ? I just add in to the tread the only talking about 2 classes or 3 classes here is five classes but only 1 functional (rangers) and second the needs alot sigils mages ( real fun class)

Then you have rogues the are abit underpower and 2 alternative support classes ( warriors and druids) you got be crazy to make a warrior main this is not a trend players make a warriors then make a ranger, and rangers are more fun to play i have all classes and dual or triple log so i have play warrior/druid. Mage/druid. Ranger/druid. Rogue/druid .

The weakest combination is mage/druids . Must efficient ( elixiring)are ranger/druid , rogue/druid And the slowest warrior/druid try to elixir as warrior/druid combo and you will see what waste it is.



just explain to me how armor in 2 bosses become relative to the whole game experience
Read papi threads aboout pvp armor and how low is the cap Ask to sirblaze how low the armor cap is when incoming damage from regular mobs.
This game is so small i. Content the a real tank is only need for top 3 bosses with tons of healing .

Same for everyone though.. Rogues and rangers (or maybe just me ), base their stats around 1-2 bosses.. (Aggy/Ymir). Without Aggy or Ymir, all rogues and rangers would only have 200 max vit to cover AoE's and then be all out DPS. I know for a fact, without taking aggy into consideration, I could take 200 points out of Dex.

At least a warrior has a purpose froman. Rogues use to be amazing dps best in game. Warriors tanks

Warriors still tanks with semi good dps

Rogues in update will be same as rangers and get out dpsed by mages and have no other role to play. No need for the class at all.

I think they should implement a thing where the mobs damage also effects level you are. E.g every level under mob you get 1% extra damage dealt. Every level over te mob u get 1% less damage dealt so higher level warriors are benifited from this

Same for everyone though.. Rogues and rangers (or maybe just me ), base their stats around 1-2 bosses.. (Aggy/Ymir). Without Aggy or Ymir, all rogues and rangers would only have 200 max vit to cover AoE's and then be all out DPS. I know for a fact, without taking aggy into consideration, I could take 200 points out of Dex.

Ok how many tank you need for aggy or ymir

2 for ymir 1 for adds to do it efficiently ( how many druids and dps)
1 for aggy 1 for adds 1 for pulling adds ( how many druids and dps)

So how many warriors u need ?

I think they should implement a thing where the mobs damage also effects level you are. E.g every level under mob you get 1% extra damage dealt. Every level over te mob u get 1% less damage dealt so higher level warriors are benifited from this

I agree. A tanks level doesn't have such a great effect apart from the extra little bit of Vit.

The best thing about Tanks, but greater than tanks, support mages/Druids, is that they don't have to be up to or above a mob or bosses level. What I mean by this is -

A 130 Rogue on Aggragoth is completely useless.

A 130 Tank on Aggragoth can have some use, albeit little.

A 130 Support Mage or Druid on Aggragoth is awesome.

At least a warrior has a purpose froman. Rogues use to be amazing dps best in game. Warriors tanks

Warriors still tanks with semi good dps

Rogues in update will be same as rangers and get out dpsed by mages and have no other role to play. No need for the class at all.

I think they should implement a thing where the mobs damage also effects level you are. E.g every level under mob you get 1% extra damage dealt. Every level over te mob u get 1% less damage dealt so higher level warriors are benifited from this

This is the fault of otm to create 2 parallel classes the are the same ( rogues/rangers) and to give better skills to long range class, to make bosses to heavy attack close combat. Classes and not long range classes .


And the role the warriors have been put on tank only is shameful, i mean play a tank woth out heals and tell me how good it is .


To the original poster go for ranger i dont see otm nerftig or breaking this class because of the high amount of players who now choose to play this class as main, but i do belevie the class to be this next extension will be mages so a mage or ranger you will be safe .

Warriors are awesome , they are extremely useful and top clans consider them very important . This crybaby crap about this class being broken and that one being broken is just that crybaby stuff .

Updates come with big changes , I am sure this one will be no different . Who knows what's in store for us .