Celtic Heroes

At this point would be nice if admin read these suggestions and commited either saying players will be very happy with dragon armor or say the ideas they had were some what different but players will be happy or they could just say the truth and say dragon armor will be an upgrades form of frozen .

IMO, radiant should remain the best dos armour for casters and warriors as they are not the dps focused classes

IMO, radiant should remain the best dos armour for casters and warriors as they are not the dps focused classes

I agree warriors don't need to be a complete dps class but should be able to deal decent damage. As a warrior i would like some damage stats on the armor as it is proving armor isnt working much after a point i would like roughly the damage of greater es for dragon armor for warriors while rogues have slightly more then radiant and rangers have the damage of radiant but other stats on the armor to make rangers use it over the actual radiant. Rogues should be top dps rangers slightly lower mages as a built nuke class higher then warriors and warriors second to last but still decent damage. Btw i find the aurguement that warriors were made to be tanks incorrect as when the game came out there wasnt any bosses needing to really tank but as bosses got harder through updates warriors being designed to be the toughest class through the common knowledge of celtic warriors it made warriors the best choice to tank and players adapted to this ( jus my opinion)

IMO, radiant should remain the best dos armour for casters and warriors as they are not the dps focused classes

I agree warriors don't need to be a complete dps class but should be able to deal decent damage. As a warrior i would like some damage stats on the armor as it is proving armor isnt working much after a point i would like roughly the damage of greater es for dragon armor for warriors while rogues have slightly more then radiant and rangers have the damage of radiant but other stats on the armor to make rangers use it over the actual radiant. Rogues should be top dps rangers slightly lower mages as a built nuke class higher then warriors and warriors second to last but still decent damage. Btw i find the aurguement that warriors were made to be tanks incorrect as when the game came out there wasnt any bosses needing to really tank but as bosses got harder through updates warriors being designed to be the toughest class through the common knowledge of celtic warriors it made warriors the best choice to tank and players adapted to this ( jus my opinion)

So close to Es damage to all armor

300 damage to rogues
250 ice/fire damage to mages add to the spell.
250 magic damage add to druid spells
250 damage to rangers
250 damage to warriors

The speed of the weapon will make the dps diference.

Every *** post about warriors turns into Fromen against the world.

Fromen, no one else thinks like you.. Not even other warriors! Everyone has seen your point and no one agrees with it. Warriors should not be a DPS class, leave it to Rangers and Rogues. Warriors armour should be as effective to them as damage is to rogues? I believe it is. Wyverns hit my rogue for 300-400 per hit in frozen. They hit my warrior clanny for 150-200 per hit on average, how the hell is that not a big difference? 100-200 per hit.. that's 1-2k damage extra, dealt on my rogue over 10 hits.

You're too single-minded Fromen and IMO, you are a selfish player, in it for yourself. Make a rogue, level it, and then you can be DPS. Turn your warrior into hybrid or tank because a DPS warrior ain't worth unfathomable. Just stop ruining everyone else's topics with your stupid and ridiculous posts.

By the way, a full vit Warrior with my Radiant and damage rings, can out dps my DPS build rogue in Frozen. Theirs not THAT much difference apart from gear, just most Rogues and Rangers are equipped with Earthstone as they hit faster than warriors.

Well my views is all melee classes should have some boost of damage added to warriors and warriors are also continuously hitting non stop on the boss so they should deal some ok damage. Do i want to be competing with rangers or rogues, no but i dont want to see very low damage numbers on mobs my lvl. Obviosly rangers should have higher dps then warriors because of rapid shot but other then that warriors and rangers are even. Reasoning is both weapons (sword and bow) are same roughly same speed while warriors has more damage on the sword so compared side to side should be close to even. Obviously rogues should be higher.

Then those roughs will keep them for their druids. <.<

Rangers rapidshot needs fixing IMO.

It is much more beneficial, energy consumption wise and timing wise, for a ranger to have their RapidShot at level 1, rather than maxed.

This is because, when adding points to Rapidshot, it lasts longer, but the recast timer is longer. Therefore if you have a maxed rapidshot using up all your energy and soloing a boss or PH, you end up having to stop Rapidshot half way to cast another bolas.

IMO, either Bolas should last longer, or when adding points to rapidshot, the recast timer shouldn't increase with it.

Warriors should deal okay damage (I think they already do), but they shouldn't rival a DPS build ranger that can't tank, nor a DPS build Rogue.

Rangers rapidshot needs fixing IMO.

It is much more beneficial, energy consumption wise and timing wise, for a ranger to have their RapidShot at level 1, rather than maxed.

This is because, when adding points to Rapidshot, it lasts longer, but the recast timer is longer. Therefore if you have a maxed rapidshot using up all your energy and soloing a boss or PH, you end up having to stop Rapidshot half way to cast another bolas.

IMO, either Bolas should last longer, or when adding points to rapidshot, the recast timer shouldn't increase with it.

Warriors should deal okay damage (I think they already do), but they shouldn't rival a DPS build ranger that can't tank, nor a DPS build Rogue.

Yea i already know rapid shot is more effective at lvl 1 then a higher lvl. As for the damage for warriors i agree the damage atm is ok and should keep up with the rest. As for if rangers as warriors should compete in a dps fight i would have to say without rapid shot they should be even since str caps and damage skills for both classes are even if not the edge would go to warrior imo as giant swing at lvl 15 was for me listed damage is 1.5k+ and pummel at 27 is 800+. Stats wise, skill wise should be even if ur leaving out rapid shot.

IMO, radiant should remain the best dos armour for casters and warriors as they are not the dps focused classes

Sorry pigman but I 100% disagree with you. I would like my dragonscale armor to benefit me even I dont choose to be full healer. What's the point in having endgame armor that just sits in your bank because I happen to choose to go a different path than what my class does best. Look every class has an option to be dps whether they will be the best at it or not they still have an option. Clearly rogues are best at dps and I would expect them to get the best of dps gear. But would u not agree that most people like to have options available to them and to be able to choose? Honestly having a rogue I wish that they would make more options for rogues as well as they do currently than only having the option to be dps.

On a side note I do 100% agree with you about fromen and his idea about how warriors should be best dps.