Celtic Heroes

The Official Forum for Celtic Heroes, the 3D MMORPG for iOS and Android Devices

Re: fire or ice at high level

#83
Fire is better dps than ice pretty much the entire fight after 10 seconds and no one can prove otherwise.
Fire is only better for bossing(and even then a ice mage can get the kill). Since very few enemies are bosses compared to all enemies, ice is generally better because of the burst damage to kill high lv mobs/small bosses quicker then fire. Also most of the time when you camp a boss its a 4/5*, which is quickly taken down(ice more dps there). Even as ice its still not hard to get kills on 6*(if you do not belive me check my 6* kills(i havent been boss fighting for almost a year also, should be more)). I also like ice because of the extra range ice blast has over firestorm. There's reasons you can be either, but ever since i started(even before ice blast existed) i always was ice, and thats what i prefer.
I'm gonna have to agree with Armo. Fires mages are going to get the kills on a level appropriate 6* boss over ice. As for the 4/5* rogues are gonna kill/lock before you even get a shot off.
Image

Image

Re: fire or ice at high level

#84
Fire is better dps than ice pretty much the entire fight after 10 seconds and no one can prove otherwise.
Fire is only better for bossing(and even then a ice mage can get the kill). Since very few enemies are bosses compared to all enemies, ice is generally better because of the burst damage to kill high lv mobs/small bosses quicker then fire. Also most of the time when you camp a boss its a 4/5*, which is quickly taken down(ice more dps there). Even as ice its still not hard to get kills on 6*(if you do not belive me check my 6* kills(i havent been boss fighting for almost a year also, should be more)). I also like ice because of the extra range ice blast has over firestorm. There's reasons you can be either, but ever since i started(even before ice blast existed) i always was ice, and thats what i prefer.
I'm gonna have to agree with Armo. Fires mages are going to get the kills on a level appropriate 6* boss over ice. As for the 4/5* rogues are gonna kill/lock before you even get a shot off.
Ice can still get the kill on *6, just depends how fast it is killed and gear. But ice is better then fire for locking 4/5*. A rogue combo will do less damage then a lured ice shard/blast combo. So locking *5 is fairly easy. Locking *4 may be a bit tougher but I got locking hits on stonecrusher(*4 snorri) with an unlured ice shard before, you just have to be ready like everyone else to attack it as soon as it appears.

It is a preference thing like I've said before, fire and ice are both good for different things. You can't say ice is underpowered etc cause it really isn't.
Last edited by Furyion on Wed Jul 15, 2015 3:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
World - Lugh
Furyion - 192 Ice Mage
Stonelord - 100 PvP Warrior
Lavalord - 60 PvP Warrior
Keepin' it old school.
Do you like Celtic Heroes? Join the Official Unofficial Discord today!
https://discord.gg/mPHnzmr

Re: fire or ice at high level

#85
Fire is not only good for 6* not to mention I fail to see why cant fire be great to lock 5* and 4*, perhaps ice is better on 5* but fire is definitely great. Not to mention I can show u a great pvp fire mage.
#NerfMages #AvoidBalance #WhyPlayARogue #MeatShieldOnly #HealingSlavesOnly

OP dps warrior on Belenus, hot af melee druid on Nuada. #Elementals #Apex

Re: fire or ice at high level

#86
Fire is not only good for 6* not to mention I fail to see why cant fire be great to lock 5* and 4*, perhaps ice is better on 5* but fire is definitely great. Not to mention I can show u a great pvp fire mage.
Ice is better on short fights due to burst damage(quick heavy damage hits), which is good because of the lock working mid-fight.

Ice is best for pvp though. I've tested and a ice shard and a fire bolt have the same cast time. So a lure and firebolt/ice shard take the same time. A ice shard also does significantly more damage then a firebolt, so if a fire mage and ice mage fought they would attack at pretty much the same time and one attack would deal a lot more damage making it more likely ice wins.

In non mage pvp fights a ice mage can take advantage of the freeze skill more, freezing their opponent then luring and hitting them with 2 ice attacks that almost always instantly kills anyone their level.
World - Lugh
Furyion - 192 Ice Mage
Stonelord - 100 PvP Warrior
Lavalord - 60 PvP Warrior
Keepin' it old school.
Do you like Celtic Heroes? Join the Official Unofficial Discord today!
https://discord.gg/mPHnzmr

Re: fire or ice at high level

#87
It surprises me how ignorant some people can be. Clearly you're way too attached to ice to see the truth:

Any fight beyond 10 seconds, fire mages deal more DPS and ice mages get further and further behind.
Well Furyion, clearly you didn't want to do the math so I instead did it for you.

Using Swan's skill damage formulas:

Level 50 Fire Bolt Damage = 72.853*sqrt(Focus) + 21.611*sqrt(Fire Magic) + 264.84 + Fire Attunement Damage Boost
Level 50 Firestorm Damage = 90.164*sqrt(Focus) + 25.515*sqrt(Fire Magic) + 365.43 + Fire Attunement Damage Boost


Level 50 Ice Blast Damage = 117.97*sqrt(Focus) + 32.835*sqrt(Ice Magic) + 487.25 + Ice Attunement Damage Boost
Level 50 Ice Shards Damage = 96.322*sqrt(Focus) + 30.47*sqrt(Ice Magic) + 702.43 + Ice Attunement Damage Boost


Will be ignoring attunement and any direct damage boosting items for fair comparison. Will be assuming a mage has 2000 focus and 3000 fire/ice magic.

Inserting these numbers into the formulas, you get:
Image
Recast times for each skill without cool down reductions are also shown.


I then proceeded to spam skills at a target and record how many times I could use each skill within certain time frames, these are the results I got.
Image
The figures are accumulated and are up to the time period. (e.g. for time 20, fire mages could cast 3 fire bolts and 1 fire storm up to 20 seconds into the fight)

Applying these figures to the damage numbers from the skill formulas, I got:
Image
Finally, summing all these figures in the respective time periods, I got:
Image
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

These results are actually more impressive than I had initially thought since I thought Ice Mages actually had a chance until 30 seconds. But nope, after fire mages cast their second fire bolt (7 seconds into the fight) they have officially dealt more damage and will continue to do so for the rest of the fight. The one single exception is during the 15-20 second mark where ice mages can recast both their skills.
Image
A mage at heart... Fire mage that is.
Currently actively playing the game.

Re: fire or ice at high level

#88
^ I see the problem. You said it too. You ignored attune and damage boosting gear. Ice attune is more powerful then fire attune. And ice damage boosts are generally better then fire.(example hrung helm godly is 1k ice shard, godly fire is less and it's for firestorm. Also spider rings give much more then fire, and occult gloves 900 to shard. Probably missing a few more too, but that's what I remember atm)
World - Lugh
Furyion - 192 Ice Mage
Stonelord - 100 PvP Warrior
Lavalord - 60 PvP Warrior
Keepin' it old school.
Do you like Celtic Heroes? Join the Official Unofficial Discord today!
https://discord.gg/mPHnzmr

Re: fire or ice at high level

#89
I was waiting for you to say that, since I knew you would ignore my previous posts:
Assuming both mages have:

- Two godly silverweb rings: Fire bolt gets damage buff of 2x450 (900), Ice shards gets damage buff of 2x900 (1800)
- Godly trollblood hrung helms: Fire storm gets damage buff of 800, Ice shards gets damage buff of 1000
- Godly mordris bracelets: Fire bolt gets damage buff of 510, Ice blast gets damage buff of 1000

Inputting these we end up with:
Image
You end up with pretty much the same results with the highest tier gear... Fire mage is always superior in DPS except for the 15-20 second mark. I cannot test cooldown yet since I don't have a shards skull, but if you guys still decide to ignore the obvious then I might borrow a clanny's.
Even with attune, you can see any damage bonuses increase proportionally. Doesn't matter if ice boosts add more, fire casts quicker to make up for this.

Edit: Keep arguing "oh but you didn't add occult helm!" or whatever you want, but the facts are right in front of you. Ignore them if you want, but don't post thinking you're right as all it does is make yourself look less and less knowledgeable about the class.
Image
A mage at heart... Fire mage that is.
Currently actively playing the game.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests