Celtic Heroes

It most certainly does disprove it. Despite your so called 'scholarly interpretation' that attempts to reconcile it with facts we all know.

Let's indeed look at 1:1. "In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth". Wrong since it implies simultaneously and the earth is 1/3 the age of the universe or 10 billion years younger. The earth was never 'formless and empty, darkness over the surface of the deep" as the earth most certainly had near its current form, albeit with much more volcanism, tidal forces, and much different weather and atmospheric gas content than today. God then went on to create the sky - which in reality formed at the same time as the earth - bible fail. The water was not gathered to 'one place' Seed bearing and fruit bearing plants were not even close to being first - it was highly simple single cells that we see fossils of first with a likely even simpler precursor that has yet to be discovered. Plants first is 100% wrong. now this BS about creating light? Light had been around before the first nanosecond of time had elapsed. Next the BS about two lights one for the day and one the night - the moon which anyone in the 20th century knows is simply reflected sunlight and that the moon came about as part of the earths formation in a giant impact. Now god made wild land animals - wrong! First eyurokrotic animals evolved in the oceans and existed long before on land.
We haven't gotten to even 1:24 and every single thing god said is provably false - obviously false to anyone with intellectual honesty and an iq over 75.

No, they actually weren't, I don't even know where you're getting this from, if you compare the teenagers from this generation, to any other ones from the past, you can see how true these words are.

I agree, teenagers have changed (for better or for worse) but since when did we live in a society of solely teenagers?

It most certainly does disprove it. Despite your so called 'scholarly interpretation' that attempts to reconcile it with facts we all know.

Let's indeed look at 1:1. "In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth". Wrong since it implies simultaneously and the earth is 1/3 the age of the universe or 10 billion years younger. The earth was never 'formless and empty, darkness over the surface of the deep" as the earth most certainly had near its current form, albeit with much more volcanism, tidal forces, and much different weather and atmospheric gas content than today. God then went on to create the sky - which in reality formed at the same time as the earth - bible fail. The water was not gathered to 'one place' Seed bearing and fruit bearing plants were not even close to being first - it was highly simple single cells that we see fossils of first with a likely even simpler precursor that has yet to be discovered. Plants first is 100% wrong. now this BS about creating light? Light had been around before the first nanosecond of time had elapsed. Next the BS about two lights one for the day and one the night - the moon which anyone in the 20th century knows is simply reflected sunlight and that the moon came about as part of the earths formation in a giant impact. Now god made wild land animals - wrong! First eyurokrotic animals evolved in the oceans and existed long before on land.
We haven't gotten to even 1:24 and every single thing god said is provably false - obviously false to anyone with intellectual honesty and an iq over 75.

won't even bother replying to this, couldn't stop laughing after I read the argument, "it implies simultaneously and the earth is one third the age of the universe or 10 billion years younger"

No, they actually weren't, I don't even know where you're getting this from, if you compare the teenagers from this generation, to any other ones from the past, you can see how true these words are.

I agree, teenagers have changed (for better or for worse) but since when did we live in a society of solely teenagers?

It most certainly does disprove it. Despite your so called 'scholarly interpretation' that attempts to reconcile it with facts we all know.

Let's indeed look at 1:1. "In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth". Wrong since it implies simultaneously and the earth is 1/3 the age of the universe or 10 billion years younger. The earth was never 'formless and empty, darkness over the surface of the deep" as the earth most certainly had near its current form, albeit with much more volcanism, tidal forces, and much different weather and atmospheric gas content than today. God then went on to create the sky - which in reality formed at the same time as the earth - bible fail. The water was not gathered to 'one place' Seed bearing and fruit bearing plants were not even close to being first - it was highly simple single cells that we see fossils of first with a likely even simpler precursor that has yet to be discovered. Plants first is 100% wrong. now this BS about creating light? Light had been around before the first nanosecond of time had elapsed. Next the BS about two lights one for the day and one the night - the moon which anyone in the 20th century knows is simply reflected sunlight and that the moon came about as part of the earths formation in a giant impact. Now god made wild land animals - wrong! First eyurokrotic animals evolved in the oceans and existed long before on land.
We haven't gotten to even 1:24 and every single thing god said is provably false - obviously false to anyone with intellectual honesty and an iq over 75.

won't even bother replying to this, couldn't stop laughing after I read the argument, "it implies simultaneously and the earth is one third the age of the universe or 10 billion years younger"

That is a fact. Look it up don't take my word for it. Also you ignore the rest because you can't bring yourself to truth. You should accept reality instead of denying it. You could seriously injure yourself by not knowing what is real.

That is a fact. Look it up don't take my word for it. Also you ignore the rest because you can't bring yourself to truth. You should accept reality instead of denying it. You could seriously injure yourself by not knowing what is real.

Based on what? Lol. Human 'knowledge'? I'm sure that monkeys who evolved would totally be capable of identifying such a fact.

Monkeys have higher average iq than humans

I personally brag an I.Q. Of 146 and was asked to join Mensa. An institute for the highest top 2% I.Q. In the country. Naturally. I denied because paying money to have someone say you are smart is ironic in my opinion. That's another thing all by itself tho.