Celtic Heroes

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CbqNIbjcv_w


Watch this and then come back and tell me that evolution is perfectly reasonable.

you mean the convicted felon criminal who is in jail right now for scamming people and taxes? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind

lmao! That guy is a self serving jerk, and spews more bullshi+ than all the farm runoff in the world. A toddler could see through his crap.

Try using references like PlosOne or Nature for your 'scientific' evidence. Those are actually peer reviewed journals.

Ed there is no right or wrong. There is merely what society says we should do or what our brain says we shouldn't do. Why so you think vlad the impaler existed? Because he was free of that societal bond that instilled such a sense of right and wrong on him. However the boundaries of right or wrong are intensified with the fact that if I were to bash someones head in I have a pretty large chance of spending a while in jail.

We all lead the evidence to the conclusion that we want to accept.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CbqNIbjcv_w


Watch this and then come back and tell me that evolution is perfectly reasonable.

you mean the convicted felon criminal who is in jail right now for scamming people and taxes? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind

lmao! That guy is a self serving jerk, and spews more bullshi+ than all the farm runoff in the world. A toddler could see through his crap.

Try using references like PlosOne or Nature for your 'scientific' evidence. Those are actually peer reviewed journals.

Just because hes in jail doesn't mean what he said is not true.

Oh yea? Elaborate how the scientist quotes were "taken out of context". That's a lie. I didn't paraphrase anything, it was their words, not mine, look it up yourself, they have started to realize evolution isn't completely based on facts. Look it up yourself.

I can just as easily say you quote mined Albert Einstine. It was taken out of context

Stop quote mining

To take something out of context includes more than just paraphrasing or not showing surrounding words. It is also about the nature of the writing and the source.

When I quoted Albert Einstein, it was not to prove something correct or incorrect. His opinion of God just happens to be just about the same as mine. Quite frankly, I really only quoted him to show how an opinion from one person (or even many people) can only provide insight that is imperfect and worthless in the face of data and investigation.

The people you quoted are on the outskirts of the scientific community with some even being regarded as not even scientists anymore. They have their own radical belief and opinion on these concepts. I could do the same thing by finding religious people on the outskirts of their religion who believe in evolution and say good things about it, but that would be taking their quote out of context. It would neither be a majority or representative of the overall position that others like them have.

Now, before you start complaining about the other quotes I used or gathering up more quotes to reply, I will tell you right now that what I used was to make a point that your answers in quotes were unreliable and a tad annoying. Answer with your own words and your own mind. If another source is needed, seek out well known sources for data and information. If you do in fact make a point, it is your burden to provide it with hard evidence and sound reasoning.

Oh yea? Elaborate how the scientist quotes were "taken out of context". That's a lie. I didn't paraphrase anything, it was their words, not mine, look it up yourself, they have started to realize evolution isn't completely based on facts. Look it up yourself.

I can just as easily say you quote mined Albert Einstine. It was taken out of context

Stop quote mining

To take something out of context includes more than just paraphrasing or not showing surrounding words. It is also about the nature of the writing and the source.

When I quoted Albert Einstein, it was not to prove something correct or incorrect. His opinion of God just happens to be just about the same as mine. Quite frankly, I really only quoted him to show how an opinion from one person (or even many people) can only provide insight that is imperfect and worthless in the face of data and investigation.

The people you quoted are on the outskirts of the scientific community with some even being regarded as not even scientists anymore. They have their own radical belief and opinion on these concepts. I could do the same thing by finding religious people on the outskirts of their religion who believe in evolution and say good things about it, but that would be taking their quote out of context. It would neither be a majority or representative of the overall position that others like them have.

Now, before you start complaining about the other quotes I used or gathering up more quotes to reply, I will tell you right now that what I used was to make a point that your answers in quotes were unreliable and a tad annoying. Answer with your own words and your own mind. If another source is needed, seek out well known sources for data and information. If you do in fact make a point, it is your burden to provide it with hard evidence and sound reasoning.

I knew you were annoying in game at times but not mentally challenged. I find it funny how i disprove your theory's and its 'taking things out of context' but when you do it, in your mind, it's using facts. Sit down Doc, you aren't making any sense.

We all lead the evidence to the conclusion that we want to accept.

As far as religion and evolution, absolutely. Also in many other areas.
The reason I claim no religion and also do not believe evolution is because of the way evidence is used by all sides to reach their own conclusions, but I am unconvinced and unsatisfied with any of the explanations.
As far as I have ever seen:
Evolution is not proven and I don't believe it is necessarily true, but I believe it is a possible explanation with insufficient evidence that may be proven some day.
The Bible is not proven and I don't believe it is necessarily true, but I believe it is a possible explanation with insufficient evidence that may be proven some day.
To the objective listener, both sides have arguments that make sense and arguments that are biased.

I still think the most likely explanation for the origin of the universe is that a god created it and no one has given anything like an intelligent argument to convince me otherwise. It makes sense that a god would be intelligent, so I am leaned towards intelligent design. This does not mean I believe that the god of the Bible is the answer, but I think it is one possibility.

Oh yea? Elaborate how the scientist quotes were "taken out of context". That's a lie. I didn't paraphrase anything, it was their words, not mine, look it up yourself, they have started to realize evolution isn't completely based on facts. Look it up yourself.

I can just as easily say you quote mined Albert Einstine. It was taken out of context

Stop quote mining

To take something out of context includes more than just paraphrasing or not showing surrounding words. It is also about the nature of the writing and the source.

When I quoted Albert Einstein, it was not to prove something correct or incorrect. His opinion of God just happens to be just about the same as mine. Quite frankly, I really only quoted him to show how an opinion from one person (or even many people) can only provide insight that is imperfect and worthless in the face of data and investigation.

The people you quoted are on the outskirts of the scientific community with some even being regarded as not even scientists anymore. They have their own radical belief and opinion on these concepts. I could do the same thing by finding religious people on the outskirts of their religion who believe in evolution and say good things about it, but that would be taking their quote out of context. It would neither be a majority or representative of the overall position that others like them have.

Now, before you start complaining about the other quotes I used or gathering up more quotes to reply, I will tell you right now that what I used was to make a point that your answers in quotes were unreliable and a tad annoying. Answer with your own words and your own mind. If another source is needed, seek out well known sources for data and information. If you do in fact make a point, it is your burden to provide it with hard evidence and sound reasoning.

I knew you were annoying in game at times but not mentally challenged. I find it funny how i disprove your theory's and its 'taking things out of context' but when you do it, in your mind, it's using facts. Sit down Doc, you aren't making any sense.