Celtic Heroes

Have you also forgotten that our debt is now like almost twice what it was when he was first elected? Didnt he promise to lower it?
Also he backed down from the red line he drew for iran(i think it was Iran; maybe Syria, sorry its been awhile). You should never back down unless the other country complies. Otherwise you show that you are week and that your threats don't mean much.

Have you also forgotten that our debt is now like almost twice what it was when he was first elected? Didnt he promise to lower it?
Also he backed down from the red line he drew for iran(i think it was Iran; maybe Syria, sorry its been awhile). You should never back down unless the other country complies. Otherwise you show that you are week and that your threats don't mean much.

There is only so much you can do after the Bush era (especially after the republican dominated congress), increasing population, and other developing countries.

I don't remember about the red line stuff... However, if backing down can accomplish goals and prevent increased tensions, then why not?

Edit: Also going to repeat: lesser of two evils. There are some third parties I would consider over R and D but there will only ever be R and D.

Have you also forgotten that our debt is now like almost twice what it was when he was first elected? Didnt he promise to lower it?
Also he backed down from the red line he drew for iran(i think it was Iran; maybe Syria, sorry its been awhile). You should never back down unless the other country complies. Otherwise you show that you are week and that your threats don't mean much.

There is only so much you can do after the Bush era (especially after the republican dominated congress), increasing population, and other developing countries.

I don't remember about the red line stuff... However, if backing down can accomplish goals and prevent increased tensions, then why not?

Edit: Also going to repeat: lesser of two evils. There are some third parties I would consider over R and D but there will only ever be R and D.

It's called trickle down economics. Reagen used it and it worked great. Backing down never solves anything(unless the other person/country complies). If u back down once you will keep backing down.

Redogy: pm me and i will tell you why gay marriage should not be an option(no plus3 the argument im using here has pretty much nothing to do with the Biblr but with a dictionary.

Dont be racist jesse Jackson, its not that he is black its because he is trying to make america how he wants it and not how the people want it , for example his health care plan

Have you forgotten Obama has the lowest approval rating in history? He was getting this before 2012. For some reason people reelected him though.

A lot of people didnt want him in office solely because of th fact that hes black. And he got reflected because no president can actually do things in one single term. It takes the president at least 5-6 years to complete their plan and make them active and efficient. Cant expect that to happen in 4 years, especially when people mess around. So by the end of his first term some people were okay with giving him more time, others didnt. It happens.

Lol the only reason people elected him because he was the first African American...
Have you realized how much debt he caused for the US? He goes to the golf course costing us hundred thousands of dollars just for a week for going to a golf course and giving a speech... And that obamacare? Thats crap, poor people who never even work get paid money. Heck maybe all of us should quit our jobs and get money for doing nothing

Ok, for those of you talking about the debt, here is my standpoint:
http://www.policymic.com/articles/7565/ ... it-problem

Regarding "Obamacare"... Well, I guess it is hard to get people to care for their entire country and not just themselves. Before you start to judge Obamacare, based on what I assume people hear from Fox News, take a look at some other countries like the UK, Sweden, Europe in general, etc. Their healthcare plans are obviously working well. America should follow suit... In fact, America should have done it first

I thought Obama reduced the DEFICIT..

Dude woa

Have you also forgotten that our debt is now like almost twice what it was when he was first elected? Didnt he promise to lower it?
Also he backed down from the red line he drew for iran(i think it was Iran; maybe Syria, sorry its been awhile). You should never back down unless the other country complies. Otherwise you show that you are week and that your threats don't mean much.

Hehe remember how bill Clinton had an affair in office? And would you care to remind us of the republican known as George W bush? Him and his son ruined ur country. (Im fairly sure all of those are republicans)

Have you also forgotten that our debt is now like almost twice what it was when he was first elected? Didnt he promise to lower it?
Also he backed down from the red line he drew for iran(i think it was Iran; maybe Syria, sorry its been awhile). You should never back down unless the other country complies. Otherwise you show that you are week and that your threats don't mean much.

There is only so much you can do after the Bush era (especially after the republican dominated congress), increasing population, and other developing countries.

I don't remember about the red line stuff... However, if backing down can accomplish goals and prevent increased tensions, then why not?

Edit: Also going to repeat: lesser of two evils. There are some third parties I would consider over R and D but there will only ever be R and D.

It's called trickle down economics. Reagen used it and it worked great. Backing down never solves anything(unless the other person/country complies). If u back down once you will keep backing down.

Redogy: pm me and i will tell you why gay marriage should not be an option(no plus3 the argument im using here has pretty much nothing to do with the Biblr but with a dictionary.

Gay marriage shouldnt actually be legal in the church, despite my atheist viewpoint that it should be legal in the law, because of the rights that come with marriage, it shouldn't be legal in church because only a man and a women, from the bibles viewpoint, can be joined in "holy matrimony"