Do you have any evidence that atheists kill babies? And no the voices in your head are not verifiable sources. Second. We have conclusive proof of evolution, google search "Lucy homo habilis" Lucy is one of the missing links, meaning evolution is obviously happening, you can believe god made evolution happen if you want, but dont doubt the facts.There is zero evidence of us being born with fur all over our bodies, like a primates body either.
There are multiple sources of factual evidence that show beyond any doubt genesis and Adam/eve were a myth. And zero evidence for it.
No matter how much you believe it or wish think it to be true it is false. No need for a god to do anything.
There is zero evidence in the big bang actually happening( probably "logical" explenations on how it could be SLIGHTLY possible, but not that it really happened)
Atheists only make up stuff and act like its fact, because it sounds "logical".
Does this seem logical? Because atheists pretty much says this:
SAVE OUR PLANET BUYING HYBRID CARS! KILL BABIES BECAUSE WE DONT NEED THEM!
Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#292Maybe if you spelt right you would be less ignorent to the Big BangAlso, atheists say that all life was from a small chance that evolved billions of years later....
Was the whole universe crated by a thing that did not exsist? By a little explosion that happened trillions x99999999999999999999999999 years ago?
How did it all start? By a big explosion?
You have to have more faith and ignorance to believe this crap
Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#293You know not every one can afford hybrids?Royal doubting climate change is seriously dangerous for humanity as a whole, we will run out of food in 30 years anyway because of climate change if it goes on at its current rate.
Did you know that they are frikin expensive, just to feed the greedy, already rich people's pockets?
Not every one can afford a hybrid, so the planet is doomed anyways.
Also, saving trees is more important then saving a babies life?
Sounds so logical.
If we want to save our planet, we have to start with every industrial company, the ones who actually makes the air dirty with their factories.
Peoples cars wont save the planet, we would all have to change to really expensive technology, or go back to a more primitive state.
Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#294Trees cannot have their rings changed, the rings are xylem which supply water up the tree, 99% of the tree is dead xylemFirst, share with me where in the Bible it says that we are the only beings created.
Second, have people killed other people for being witches in the name of God? Yes they have. Does that mean it was right or that the Bible endorses the killing of those people? No. You guys insist on believing that we are bigoted fools that believe we need to kill everyone who doesn't agree with us. This was not true on the gay issue, nor is it true now. Are there people who have killed others unjustly in the name of Christ? Yes. But just because a mouse is in a cookie jar does not make him a cookie. In other words, just because you call yourself something does not mean you are. In the Old Testament, did the law for the Israelite nation tell them to kill these people? Yes it did. In that nation, that wa the consequence for being gay. But show me where in the New Testament it tells us to be gay? If you cnt, don't even bother trying to use that as an example of how cruel we are, because if you did that, it would be false. Are there some religions which are very cruel? Certainly! But you cnt group all religion together. You also cnt group all Christians together and say that Christians are hateful. That is being bigoted. If I said all Commie's were terrible people, I would be considered a bigot. When u group all of one type of people together and call them a name, it is being bigoted. There is a difference in what some people have done in the name of God, and what God actually tells us to do.
Plus3 lets just say for a moment that carbon dating is accurate(which it is not). Almost none of the dates on carbon dating agrees with the geological ages. Also, you tell me to look at trees that have more than the amount of rings there would be if the earth was 6000 years old. Whether or not there are(which i believe that conditions can change the rings; this might not be true though, just something i remember hearing somewhere), even 20000 years would work for creationism. But why are there no trees 1000000 years old? Where did those trees go?
No vraelen, i haven't forgotten you. Its just that these questions are easier to answer than yours. I do believe however that ur stretching the meaning of that commandment. I do understand if that is not a good enough explanation, and if not i will try and get you a better one
Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#295human babies often are covered in fine fur also during gestation:There is zero evidence of us being born with fur all over our bodies, like a primates body either.
There are multiple sources of factual evidence that show beyond any doubt genesis and Adam/eve were a myth. And zero evidence for it.
No matter how much you believe it or wish think it to be true it is false. No need for a god to do anything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanugo
Why human babies even have gills like a fish:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharyngeal_arch
Human babies also have a tail and go through many stages that are remmenants of our evolutionary heritage.
There is an overwhelming amount of data that supports the big bang. Including the direct evidence published two weeks ago proving faster than light inflation as part of the process through detection of gravitational waves that polarized the light from the cosmic microwave background (the afterglow of the big bang you can still see directly).There is zero evidence in the big bang actually happening( probably "logical" explenations on how it could be SLIGHTLY possible, but not that it really happened)
You have been lied to by your religious leaders on this. It is incontrovertable.
Religious people think the earth is a gift from god and we can't influence anything. Religion is the reason why we aren't doing more to help make the earth a better place. Religion poisons the mind and makes you make bad decisions you never would if you knew what was real.
Atheists only make up stuff and act like its fact, because it sounds "logical".
Does this seem logical? Because atheists pretty much says this:
SAVE OUR PLANET BUYING HYBRID CARS! KILL BABIES BECAUSE WE DONT NEED THEM!
Member of Aeon - Taranis - 24 boxer
220+ toons
Ravenleaf druid - Silverstring ranger
Stormsong warrior - Nwerb Mage - Eventide Rogue
Toon histogram:
Level_____|200+|150-199|100-149|50-99|20-49|1-19|
# of toons|_5__|___16___|____3___|__11__|__21_|407|
220+ toons
Ravenleaf druid - Silverstring ranger
Stormsong warrior - Nwerb Mage - Eventide Rogue
Toon histogram:
Level_____|200+|150-199|100-149|50-99|20-49|1-19|
# of toons|_5__|___16___|____3___|__11__|__21_|407|
Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#296So you are one of those people who blames "the man" for all your problems?You know not every one can afford hybrids?Royal doubting climate change is seriously dangerous for humanity as a whole, we will run out of food in 30 years anyway because of climate change if it goes on at its current rate.
Did you know that they are frikin expensive, just to feed the greedy, already rich people's pockets?
Not every one can afford a hybrid, so the planet is doomed anyways.
Also, saving trees is more important then saving a babies life?
Sounds so logical.
If we want to save our planet, we have to start with every industrial company, the ones who actually makes the air dirty with their factories.
Peoples cars wont save the planet, we would all have to change to really expensive technology, or go back to a more primitive state.
Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#297I think he means the tree rings were put there by Satan to decieve us from the true path of god. Or maybe demons possessed the tree and created the rings magically.Trees cannot have their rings changed, the rings are xylem which supply water up the tree, 99% of the tree is dead xylemFirst, share with me where in the Bible it says that we are the only beings created.
Second, have people killed other people for being witches in the name of God? Yes they have. Does that mean it was right or that the Bible endorses the killing of those people? No. You guys insist on believing that we are bigoted fools that believe we need to kill everyone who doesn't agree with us. This was not true on the gay issue, nor is it true now. Are there people who have killed others unjustly in the name of Christ? Yes. But just because a mouse is in a cookie jar does not make him a cookie. In other words, just because you call yourself something does not mean you are. In the Old Testament, did the law for the Israelite nation tell them to kill these people? Yes it did. In that nation, that wa the consequence for being gay. But show me where in the New Testament it tells us to be gay? If you cnt, don't even bother trying to use that as an example of how cruel we are, because if you did that, it would be false. Are there some religions which are very cruel? Certainly! But you cnt group all religion together. You also cnt group all Christians together and say that Christians are hateful. That is being bigoted. If I said all Commie's were terrible people, I would be considered a bigot. When u group all of one type of people together and call them a name, it is being bigoted. There is a difference in what some people have done in the name of God, and what God actually tells us to do.
Plus3 lets just say for a moment that carbon dating is accurate(which it is not). Almost none of the dates on carbon dating agrees with the geological ages. Also, you tell me to look at trees that have more than the amount of rings there would be if the earth was 6000 years old. Whether or not there are(which i believe that conditions can change the rings; this might not be true though, just something i remember hearing somewhere), even 20000 years would work for creationism. But why are there no trees 1000000 years old? Where did those trees go?
No vraelen, i haven't forgotten you. Its just that these questions are easier to answer than yours. I do believe however that ur stretching the meaning of that commandment. I do understand if that is not a good enough explanation, and if not i will try and get you a better one
Cause it was pretty funny when he said its not like you can count the tree rings to know the age of the earth and in fact you can because tree rings disprove christian creation myths
Member of Aeon - Taranis - 24 boxer
220+ toons
Ravenleaf druid - Silverstring ranger
Stormsong warrior - Nwerb Mage - Eventide Rogue
Toon histogram:
Level_____|200+|150-199|100-149|50-99|20-49|1-19|
# of toons|_5__|___16___|____3___|__11__|__21_|407|
220+ toons
Ravenleaf druid - Silverstring ranger
Stormsong warrior - Nwerb Mage - Eventide Rogue
Toon histogram:
Level_____|200+|150-199|100-149|50-99|20-49|1-19|
# of toons|_5__|___16___|____3___|__11__|__21_|407|
Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#298Carbon dating isnt the only technique, Christians just focus on it because it is the only technique they can find any problems with and even then it is fairly accurateFirst, share with me where in the Bible it says that we are the only beings created.
Second, have people killed other people for being witches in the name of God? Yes they have. Does that mean it was right or that the Bible endorses the killing of those people? No. You guys insist on believing that we are bigoted fools that believe we need to kill everyone who doesn't agree with us. This was not true on the gay issue, nor is it true now. Are there people who have killed others unjustly in the name of Christ? Yes. But just because a mouse is in a cookie jar does not make him a cookie. In other words, just because you call yourself something does not mean you are. In the Old Testament, did the law for the Israelite nation tell them to kill these people? Yes it did. In that nation, that wa the consequence for being gay. But show me where in the New Testament it tells us to be gay? If you cnt, don't even bother trying to use that as an example of how cruel we are, because if you did that, it would be false. Are there some religions which are very cruel? Certainly! But you cnt group all religion together. You also cnt group all Christians together and say that Christians are hateful. That is being bigoted. If I said all Commie's were terrible people, I would be considered a bigot. When u group all of one type of people together and call them a name, it is being bigoted. There is a difference in what some people have done in the name of God, and what God actually tells us to do.
Plus3 lets just say for a moment that carbon dating is accurate(which it is not). Almost none of the dates on carbon dating agrees with the geological ages. Also, you tell me to look at trees that have more than the amount of rings there would be if the earth was 6000 years old. Whether or not there are(which i believe that conditions can change the rings; this might not be true though, just something i remember hearing somewhere), even 20000 years would work for creationism. But why are there no trees 1000000 years old? Where did those trees go?
No vraelen, i haven't forgotten you. Its just that these questions are easier to answer than yours. I do believe however that ur stretching the meaning of that commandment. I do understand if that is not a good enough explanation, and if not i will try and get you a better one
Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#299This is not a collage test, and I found a few grammar and spelling errors in your posts tooMaybe if you spelt right you would be less ignorent to the Big BangAlso, atheists say that all life was from a small chance that evolved billions of years later....
Was the whole universe crated by a thing that did not exsist? By a little explosion that happened trillions x99999999999999999999999999 years ago?
How did it all start? By a big explosion?
You have to have more faith and ignorance to believe this crap

Re: A Discussion About Religion: The [Threequel]
#300Plus3 I like to think sometimes that when he means demons he is really referring to Wall Street