Actually, I studied information from at least nine sources including both my college and high school chemistry professors, who hold opposite views on the matter, and drew my own conclusions from what I knew. I understand I did not cover all the information about the subject, I did not have the time or the motivation to go through the trouble of typing everything out so I gave a basic description followed by the problems I saw with it. If you wish to know more about the subject, by all means, research it on your own.There was a poster above who went through supposed problems with carbon dating. Though he had obviously done a lot of thinking and reading, I suspect he was using only one collection of sources... Nothing against the poster, and I am not saying that he willfully left out the information, but I suspect that the sources he used slanted his view of the topic, as a fair amount of very important information was non-existent in the post.
Look carbon/radiometric dating up and it is not hard to find information from both people who rely on it and people who condemn it entirely as well as people in between. It is a very controversial subject and is continually under debate, just because you may not have heard of this conflict before does not mean I pulled it from an obscure source.
Did you take the Apoligia curriculum when in your high school years? If so, I would not trust that particular curriculum as there are many flaws and outdated theorems within. I know I was forced to switch to a more accurate curriculum in those years. I do believe it contained many valuable points, and it was not onesided, as it mentioned many evolutionist views and counterexamples to every one of them. Those are mostly relevent. I haven't posted on this topic in a long while, but am glad that it is still going strong.
