Celtic Heroes

You absolutely have no idea what you are talking about. First of all, it was in the old testament that they were stoned to death. We say that it is wrong, and that it should not be condoned. We also do not think that you should ignore it. Also Moses married an Ethiopian women. I wonder what color she could be. Second of all, no where in the Bible does it say that we should hate gay people or black people. It says that homosexuality is wrong, but that we should treat them with love, but we don't condone sin. Not condoning sin is not the same as hating those who do it. It doesn't even say anything about black people. Also if Christians are supposed to hate black people then why are there black Christians. What you posted is nonsense Magixal.

Oh yeah forgot to mention: I think this is my last post for today. See you tomorrow.

@ Plus3-
It is not baby murder. Baby murder is what those people were doing. They would literally chop open the stomachs of pregnant women in the cities they attacked. Also, as I said, God gave everyone there second chances, third chances, fourth chances, fifth chances, etc. It was the people's choices that killed them. Also, to that quote, the evidence we have given you you have turned down as "not being evidence" because for some reason it is too hard for you to comprehend, too scary, or you don't want to believe it. I am inclined to believe the third. If you don't want to believe me that's fine. If you are going to argue with me like "You haven't given evidence" or "Your wrong", then so be it. You don't need to believe in God. I am just trying to get my viewpoint across.
@Maxigal-
About the "Jesus existed but was only smart, not God." Jesus himself said he was the Son of God. He also said not to lie. So was Jesus a hypocrital genius who made up all these lies? Then how would he become a religion? I could spend my whole life saying I'm God and spouting parables and no one would believe me. So the option of mere genious is out of the picture. Plato and all them made parables and spoke. But they're not religions. So a genius philosopher can't work.
Option #2- Jesus was insane. Obviously not. He would not have gathered his followers through insanity.
Option #3- Jesus was the son of God. He was extraordinarily wise. He taught people how to live right. He was and is hailed as the Son of God. He has a huge religion after him.
I don't know about you, but option three sounds like the only logical one to me.
Also, we don't hate gays or blacks. We think being gay is wrong, but that doesn't mean we hate you. We also believe lying is wrong and rebelling against your parents is wrong, and being gay is just the same as those-a sin. By saying we hate gays you're saying we hate all humanity, including ourselves. By hating blacks, I'm assuming that you mean because of slavery in the bible. We've been over this. Slavery wasnt just blacks in the bible it was whites, Hispanics, Arab, male, female, EVERYBODY. Those two claims are both illegitimate.

I asked you to show me some proof of evolution. Not the other way around. You haven't shown me much proof yourself. Look, people thought Columbus was crazy in thinking that the world was round. My point is that just because many people believe it does not mean it is right. And to explain the other thing, I was just pointing out that it was someone who did know what they are talking about. In other words that it was not me. As for my age, that is classified. You don't need my age to disprove the points that I have made.

@ Plus3-
It is not baby murder. Baby murder is what those people were doing. They would literally chop open the stomachs of pregnant women in the cities they attacked. Also, as I said, God gave everyone there second chances, third chances, fourth chances, fifth chances, etc. It was the people's choices that killed them. Also, to that quote, the evidence we have given you you have turned down as "not being evidence" because for some reason it is too hard for you to comprehend, too scary, or you don't want to believe it. I am inclined to believe the third. If you don't want to believe me that's fine. If you are going to argue with me like "You haven't given evidence" or "Your wrong", then so be it. You don't need to believe in God. I am just trying to get my point across.

You absolutely have no idea what you are talking about. First of all, it was in the old testament that they were stoned to death. We say that it is wrong, and that it should not be condoned. We also do not think that you should ignore it. Also Moses married an Ethiopian women. I wonder what color she could be. Second of all, no where in the Bible does it say that we should hate gay people or black people. It says that homosexuality is wrong, but that we should treat them with love, but we don't condone sin. Not condoning sin is not the same as hating those who do it. It doesn't even say anything about black people. Also if Christians are supposed to hate black people then why are there black Christians. What you posted is nonsense Magixal.

Oh yeah forgot to mention: I think this is my last post for today. See you tomorrow.

Okay here-
http://creationscience4kids.com/2012/06 ... nderwater/

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/12/ ... cal-flood/

http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/06/does-scie ... ahs-flood/

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nature ... -flood.htm

http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-ans ... d-evidence

You don't have to read all of it lol.
I realize some is Christian sources. If you would like to run your own search just google "proof of the flood" or "was the flood real". I hope this can answer some questions.

Okay here-
http://creationscience4kids.com/2012/06 ... nderwater/

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/12/ ... cal-flood/

http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/06/does-scie ... ahs-flood/

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nature ... -flood.htm

http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-ans ... d-evidence

You don't have to read all of it lol.
I realize some is Christian sources. If you would like to run your own search just google "proof of the flood" or "was the flood real". I hope this can answer some questions.

It is funny how fast this page (with the quoted post) seemed to fall behind. The links have some interesting logic but again, it is circumstantial. It also admited that a majority of the locations are where shallow seas once were but resolved the argument by saying there are other possibilities, keep faith, etc. It is not the logic that is flawed but the lack of solid physical evidence.

Okay here-
http://creationscience4kids.com/2012/06 ... nderwater/

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/12/ ... cal-flood/

http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/06/does-scie ... ahs-flood/

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nature ... -flood.htm

http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-ans ... d-evidence

You don't have to read all of it lol.
I realize some is Christian sources. If you would like to run your own search just google "proof of the flood" or "was the flood real". I hope this can answer some questions.

It is funny how fast this page (with the quoted post) seemed to fall behind. The links have some interesting logic but again, it is circumstantial. It also admited that a majority of the locations are where shallow seas once were but resolved the argument by saying there are other possibilities, keep faith, etc. It is not the logic that is flawed but the lack of solid physical evidence.

Actually there is evidence of a Black Sea flood. I posted links in the follow up comment. It's not certain what the details were but it certainly is plausible. A small land area was stopping oceans from flooding area beneath sea level.

This only affected .025% of the earths surface.

Imagine fresh water did flood the world. It would have killed all sea life. Did Noah build water tight tanks and carry two of every whale also? Or if the flood was salt water all the fresh water fish would have died.

Somehow that point gets left out.