Celtic Heroes

In not saying nerf it massive but it is overpowered. So the cooldown needs to be more and to Leo entangled should be halfed this would make more tactics in a ramger

In not saying nerf it massive but it is overpowered. So the cooldown needs to be more and to Leo entangled should be halfed this would make more tactics in a ramger

We have heard and understand your opinion , enough already with the cryin about rangers , go make one if you think it's so unfair .

Stop *** about posts you don't like. Grow up and put some feedback...

Stop *** about posts you don't like. Grow up and put some feedback...

Actually, he is quite right, before any of you decide rangers are over powered how about you go and make one yourself say, up to level 100 and see how you like them apples.

I could easily do it but rangers arnt my thing I have a lvl 60 one. Never really enjoyed it. But the skill bolas is overpowered every ranger agrees about this. Ask yourself to solo level how much hp you need... 700?-900? Maybe 1k. While every other class needs about 3k bar Druids and mages who need about 2k at a decent lvl like 120. If the skill was nerfed slightly your build would have to incorporate more hp into your build. As you arc have a have of being hit. Let me ask all bow range why you don't use entangled?

Is the skill sucky... No not at all it decreases the damage take by half!! That's amazing but all ranger think its sucky cause they have a overpowered bolas so they don't need to be hit. Which I believe is wrong.

If Bolas was made I a 25 second cooldown it would be enough to recast before time runs out but if bolas is evaded instead of know you can bolas again so I dont need to worry. U would have to use entangled to make sure you take little damage as possible and you would have to change your build to more hp. Wait didn't rogues hVe to do that !!!! Didn't we hVe to use fast reflexes more cause we started taking damage which we never use too. Don't quake wreck is on bosses so we had to get 2k+ hp while rangers can solo and boss without taking any damage

I love the skill but I believe it is overpowered and because of these reasons you should have it nerfed but also have another buff increased. I like the fact ranger can solo but I do believe that they should have to rely on other skills not just bolas to do so...

So if I make another post that goes like this ...

Brookie stfu already we heard you , we disagree but we heard you.


Does that mean you will retype the same nonsense again ? I enjoying reading the same unfathomable over and over.

Because you disagree doesn't mean u have to type a critisize people views. You simply post a counter argument. This is why I say grow up and post useful info. Instead of saying I dot like it. Why don't you like it. Do you think it's an overpowered skill?? Why shouldn't it be nerfed? Do you agree that entangled is only Unused cause bolas is overpowered or do you think it's a bad skill? Make a list post it and there you go instead of saying stfu cause you think your right prove me wrong...

Because you disagree doesn't mean u have to type a critisize people views. You simply post a counter argument. This is why I say grow up and post useful info. Instead of saying I dot like it. Why don't you like it. Do you think it's an overpowered skill?? Why shouldn't it be nerfed? Do you agree that entangled is only Unused cause bolas is overpowered or do you think it's a bad skill? Make a list post it and there you go instead of saying stfu cause you think your right prove me wrong...

Like I said, make a ranger up to level 100 and then you can share your opinion because a ranger's life changes as a warrior and all the other classes life changes. Roughs are fine on their ow, if they get bolases the few seconds they have to sneaky, quick strike us will do the job. Warriors get more health so they can live a long time being bolases. I'm the 11th best ranger healer on Epona and I can't barely win. Mages are druids aren't effected by bolas because their all long ranged. And their wards are annoying. See, I'm telling you to fully develop a ranger because then other classes will fully develop and you will feel the pain. (doing bolas over and over again eventfully drains your mana and then eventually the warriors get you.)

btw Elm, all your doing in a couple posts is making immature insults which is "crappy information" so stop getting free posts towards your new rank and make them count.

I understand your poit and you make a valid one. But the fact is you are probably not a pvp for this an a somewhat low level no offence intended. I you get to a higher level and go pvp build then rangers tend to rock at pvp. They can beat warriors quite nicely an rogues aswell with the proper use of entangled and bolas. My friend who went pvp left me with 500 out of my 4k hp in pvp. He went 3k hp and has much worse equips then me. So with the same equips I believe he would of won easy. Ranger vs Mage. A Mage always win IMO which is the way. Rangers can tend to beat Druids,rogues,warriors with right equips and build in pvp though.

With the use of radient armour full damage rings and a lot of health a ranger could quite easily get 1k+ damage with 3k+ hp. You will say but u have no armour. With proper use of entangled and bolas then it's not as important for a ranger. You would hit a warrior 2k+ with rapid also before they even reach you. But I will take your suggestion and make a 100+ ranger.

I understand your poit and you make a valid one. But the fact is you are probably not a pvp for this an a somewhat low level no offence intended. I you get to a higher level and go pvp build then rangers tend to rock at pvp. They can beat warriors quite nicely an rogues aswell with the proper use of entangled and bolas. My friend who went pvp left me with 500 out of my 4k hp in pvp. He went 3k hp and has much worse equips then me. So with the same equips I believe he would of won easy. Ranger vs Mage. A Mage always win IMO which is the way. Rangers can tend to beat Druids,rogues,warriors with right equips and build in pvp though.

With the use of radient armour full damage rings and a lot of health a ranger could quite easily get 1k+ damage with 3k+ hp. You will say but u have no armour. With proper use of entangled and bolas then it's not as important for a ranger. You would hit a warrior 2k+ with rapid also before they even reach you. But I will take your suggestion and make a 100+ ranger.

Played a level 130 ranger (brothers, thus not on my world and doesn't show me his because ha hates siblings playing the same game.) But thus cooldown for bolas doesn't let rapid go that far so it's a waste of time, but still used, radiant, is that from agrra? Before I continue I always wanted to know is radiant seperete from solo?