Page 1 of 1

Wyrm vs adament

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 1:11 am
by Kendrill
Is it really worth me spending 122k on a bow that is slightly slower and has ten points over adament. Also an additional 100 to bow ability??

Re: Wyrm vs adament

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 1:18 am
by Kendrill
Forgot to mention i am dex build.

Re: Wyrm vs adament

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:45 am
by Napol
No, actually its not a bad idea to not even bother going to adamant and 140 wyrmbone bow. Just do warden-mete-froz-160 bone bow-dl bow

Re: Wyrm vs adament

Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 8:08 pm
by Criminal
as a warrior, i saved on wyrmbone axe, the wyrmbone doesnt seem to worth it imo, not many ppl have bought it so hard to buy from ppl, the dmg difference and same as attack isnt high, and pretty expensive

get frozen bow as fast as u can, and get anc wyrmbone, frozen btw has great speed

Re: Wyrm vs adament

Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:41 pm
by Savaged1982
Frozen sucks its horrible. Use adamant till 160. Unless you can afford the 140 bow... Which is ever so slightly better i think but not a lot

I haaaated frozen but i still used it from 135 to 160... I only had a borrowed adamant bow and had to give it back once i got frozen

Keep the adamant bro use the 120k to buy 30 xp lix :)

Re: Wyrm vs adament

Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:58 am
by Napol
Sorry but I differ with you on the frozen bow, but everyone is allowed their own opinions ofc.