Celtic Heroes

What is that supposed to mean immortalius?

Well everyone here acting like they can defeat most warriors are obviously not fighting against a warrior that knows how to play. Like the play dead strategy... how are you even going use play dead if your stunned with bash? and after im done raping you while ur stunned, I got another 5 seconds of shield wall to stop a lot of damage (or vice versa). Can you survive 5-10 seconds of getting barraged with skills without landing one hit on the warrior and THEN deal over 10k-15k damage on a highly armored target before your dead? When you can answer that question, then you can beat a warrior. And it doesn't count as winning unless u beat a warrior in a duel. Arena can be manipulated easily.

We never said we fought a warrior, its more like most players around my/our lvl. But like i said i duel all classes in mabon around my lvl and barley ever lose. If i do lose the duel, it would be very close so i just reduel and get the last kill! :-)

What is that supposed to mean immortalius?

Well everyone here acting like they can defeat most warriors are obviously not fighting against a warrior that knows how to play. Like the play dead strategy... how are you even going use play dead if your stunned with bash? and after im done raping you while ur stunned, I got another 5 seconds of shield wall to stop a lot of damage (or vice versa). Can you survive 5-10 seconds of getting barraged with skills without landing one hit on the warrior and THEN deal over 10k-15k damage on a highly armored target before your dead? When you can answer that question, then you can beat a warrior. And it doesn't count as winning unless u beat a warrior in a duel. Arena can be manipulated easily.

We never said we fought a warrior, its more like most players around my/our lvl. But like i said i duel all classes in mabon around my lvl and barley ever lose. If i do lose the duel, it would be very close so i just reduel and get the last kill! :-)

What is that supposed to mean immortalius?

Well everyone here acting like they can defeat most warriors are obviously not fighting against a warrior that knows how to play. Like the play dead strategy... how are you even going use play dead if your stunned with bash? and after im done raping you while ur stunned, I got another 5 seconds of shield wall to stop a lot of damage (or vice versa). Can you survive 5-10 seconds of getting barraged with skills without landing one hit on the warrior and THEN deal over 10k-15k damage on a highly armored target before your dead? When you can answer that question, then you can beat a warrior. And it doesn't count as winning unless u beat a warrior in a duel. Arena can be manipulated easily.

Well, just like warriors have their pvp builds rogues have theirs, its not like anyone mentioned a common dps rogue beating a warrior, if I remember correctly smellyunder made a post where he had 11k health and 2.2k dmg with dl dagger, strong enough to beat a warrior with tactics, while a tank warrior will not only have low dmg, he'll waste two skills on shield bash and shield wall, limits him to 3 dps skill (shatter, double and I guess rupture), and if he wants proc stance and/or def form he'll need to limit himself to even less dmg skills.

Escaping druid with roots + mount skill would prob be the strongest, but a double freeze for mage is also deadly, and I wonder if anyone has a mage with both freezing mounts (skimmer and nightflyer), triple freeze :S

What is that supposed to mean immortalius?

Well everyone here acting like they can defeat most warriors are obviously not fighting against a warrior that knows how to play. Like the play dead strategy... how are you even going use play dead if your stunned with bash? and after im done raping you while ur stunned, I got another 5 seconds of shield wall to stop a lot of damage (or vice versa). Can you survive 5-10 seconds of getting barraged with skills without landing one hit on the warrior and THEN deal over 10k-15k damage on a highly armored target before your dead? When you can answer that question, then you can beat a warrior. And it doesn't count as winning unless u beat a warrior in a duel. Arena can be manipulated easily.

Well, just like warriors have their pvp builds rogues have theirs, its not like anyone mentioned a common dps rogue beating a warrior, if I remember correctly smellyunder made a post where he had 11k health and 2.2k dmg with dl dagger, strong enough to beat a warrior with tactics, while a tank warrior will not only have low dmg, he'll waste two skills on shield bash and shield wall, limits him to 3 dps skill (shatter, double and I guess rupture), and if he wants proc stance and/or def form he'll need to limit himself to even less dmg skills.

Escaping druid with roots + mount skill would prob be the strongest, but a double freeze for mage is also deadly, and I wonder if anyone has a mage with both freezing mounts (skimmer and nightflyer), triple freeze :S

+1

I hate it when mages have freeze, two freezes is deadly, three is just op...

I hate it when mages have freeze, two freezes is deadly, three is just op...

Wait what. How do people get three freezes.

Remeber when you equip a mount wep or armor with a skill those skills take about 1min before you can use so no triple freeze I wish tho, but maybe otm will make a fpcus ammy with freeze

Have bloodthorn set, axe of conquest, ring of haste, riftskull brace for energy and str or a ergy and dex, and 160 dagger, use sneaky, ss, double att, and qs, go full hp... This build smashes warriors

Have bloodthorn set, axe of conquest, ring of haste, riftskull brace for energy and str or a ergy and dex, and 160 dagger, use sneaky, ss, double att, and qs, go full hp... This build smashes warriors

A full vit warrior would beat a full vit rogue

Let's just say that for every build there is another build that can counter it, hence why no player is pvp invincible in the true meaning of the word not the ranking lol