Celtic Heroes

hello, I'm EXTREMELY confused.
i have a warrior build in rosemerta that is able to 3 shot most ppl!
but i dunno why. all my accounts are legit, if i was hacking i wouldn't be typing this, would i?
for some reason this build seems to destroy every single class exept ice attune mages with big esheild and tanks like 10 lvs above me, but i seem to specialize in killing rouges.

heres my stupid build.
str: 76
dex: 46
foc: 36
vit: 66

my gear: red claw helm, hammered red claw chest plate and greaves, hammered plate gauntlets, dauntless boots, ancient broad axe.

jewelry: bightsong torc, blessing of belenus, declans ring, signet of lir, greater ring of shatter.

my skills i use for pvp:
shatter: 15/15 (18/15)
double attack: 11/15
giant swing: 8/15
pummel: 1/15 (only for those who hang on with a sliver of health >:D)
frenzy: 4/15

this build also kills mobs, like conch stalkers.
i am lv 39 atm.

now plz respond, with logic, HOW AM I 3 SHOTTING LV 50'S?!?!

Well, your shatter lowers armor, and rogues already have lower armor. Double attack is a real damager, and then giant swing will finish em off.

at ur lvl, most of the ppl arent very experienced, i can one melee most of those, i can see them having 400 health or less, including warriors
also, double attack does tons of dmg, same as giant swing, except that its crap (slow casting and cooldown, dmg still not worth it)

double attack with a two handed weapon will destroy them (LOTS of damage) plus theyll have their armor lowered by shatter

also most people at your level dont know how to make a decent build

i noticed how most people responding are talking about my ability to kill ppl that have low lv and low skill, when my main question at the end was about killing lv 50s. my build can be much better, like 105 str, getting rid of extra dex, getting ancient battle axe (99 dmg instead of my current 73.)
basically what I'm saying is that how i can defeat more skilled people with not so amazing strength. i could be doing 50-70 more dmg with giant swing and shatter, and about 100-130 more dmg with double attack, multiplying my dmg by about 1.5x.
oh, and lets not forget that i can replace my giant swing with rupture when i get another 15k, 10k for rupture, 5k for alt book

I heard that warriors aren't great end builds a good rogue could damage a warrior enough to eventually kill him in pvp, mages can weaken them with lures perhaps, so even though warriors have an advantage early on, they kinda get matched up by the end in pvp wise stuff, so enjoy the glory while it lasts :3

I heard that warriors aren't great end builds a good rogue could damage a warrior enough to eventually kill him in pvp, mages can weaken them with lures perhaps, so even though warriors have an advantage early on, they kinda get matched up by the end in pvp wise stuff, so enjoy the glory while it lasts :3

no... just no
i agree warriors suck as an end game, but full good tank is very hard to beat, need very strong rogue or an ice mage with tons of luck to beat them
only one of our fire mages had a fire build for pvp and almost beat our tank

I heard that warriors aren't great end builds a good rogue could damage a warrior enough to eventually kill him in pvp, mages can weaken them with lures perhaps, so even though warriors have an advantage early on, they kinda get matched up by the end in pvp wise stuff, so enjoy the glory while it lasts :3

no... just no
i agree warriors suck as an end game, but full good tank is very hard to beat, need very strong rogue or an ice mage with tons of luck to beat them
only one of our fire mages had a fire build for pvp and almost beat our tank

agreed
warriors are awesome in pvp no matter what level

not saying its not awesome, just not the best damage wise (such as he mentioned 3 hitting most people)