Celtic Heroes

I do it for fun, personally no warrior should fight with a bow, but we are given a bow. With full novelty the war bow does no damage at all.
Just like a anger shouldn't use knuckles and spears, they are rangers after all.

So you feel rangers shouldn't have spear/knucks , ok fine but because of that you want warriors to have ranged attack ?

Mushing up the classes , exactly what you ranted against yesterday , you seem confused

Thinking logically about it, a warrior knowing how to use a bow isn't that far off. Not having access to the best bows is reasonable because his skills in ranged attacks may not be effective enough to use a more advanced bow.


Either way my suggestion was that every class should be able to use every weapon, but if they are not using a weapon for their class it only does a max of half damage.


If a rogue wanted to learn how to use a bow, he could, but he would never be as effective at using one as a ranger, thus the half damage.

Thinking logically about it, a warrior knowing how to use a bow isn't that far off. Not having access to the best bows is reasonable because his skills in ranged attacks may not be effective enough to use a more advanced bow.


Either way my suggestion was that every class should be able to use every weapon, but if they are not using a weapon for their class it only does a max of half damage.


If a rogue wanted to learn how to use a bow, he could, but he would never be as effective at using one as a ranger, thus the half damage.

Great idea, though some radiant gear might mess it up

Thinking logically about it, a warrior knowing how to use a bow isn't that far off. Not having access to the best bows is reasonable because his skills in ranged attacks may not be effective enough to use a more advanced bow.


Either way my suggestion was that every class should be able to use every weapon, but if they are not using a weapon for their class it only does a max of half damage.


If a rogue wanted to learn how to use a bow, he could, but he would never be as effective at using one as a ranger, thus the half damage.

-1 to this idea, weapons like armor set each class apart , this is another instance of mushing the classes together.

I do it for fun, personally no warrior should fight with a bow, but we are given a bow. With full novelty the war bow does no damage at all.
Just like a anger shouldn't use knuckles and spears, they are rangers after all.

So you feel rangers shouldn't have spear/knucks , ok fine but because of that you want warriors to have ranged attack ?

Mushing up the classes , exactly what you ranted against yesterday , you seem confused

You seem to be either twisting what I'm saying or not understanding properly.

You are right, rangers should only be allowed to use bows, as that is their main weapon.

Any weapon that is all classes but not for your particular class should be novelty use only.

Warriors: swords, hammers and spears
Rogues: daggers and knuckles
Rangers: bows
Druids: totems and staffs
Mages: whatever they use!

ALL THE REST SHOULD BE AS A NOVALTY, which equals next to no damage

Thinking logically about it, a warrior knowing how to use a bow isn't that far off. Not having access to the best bows is reasonable because his skills in ranged attacks may not be effective enough to use a more advanced bow.


Either way my suggestion was that every class should be able to use every weapon, but if they are not using a weapon for their class it only does a max of half damage.


If a rogue wanted to learn how to use a bow, he could, but he would never be as effective at using one as a ranger, thus the half damage.

-1 to this idea, weapons like armor set each class apart , this is another instance of mushing the classes together.

Basically my point, rangers using spears and knuckles

Holy crap. How can you say novelty is no damage that's just nonsense. It's all about the gear and the str multiplier, your novelty does bad damage cause your gear sucks I am guessing .

Holy crap. How can you say novelty is no damage that's just nonsense. It's all about the gear and the str multiplier, your novelty does bad damage cause your gear sucks I am guessing .

Omg you can be no more wrong , lol donko owns every armor in the game , every single accesories and lux items pre updae after update , wow. I mean i think danu is the must competive server in game. Ppl from other server are just ......

Holy crap. How can you say novelty is no damage that's just nonsense. It's all about the gear and the str multiplier, your novelty does bad damage cause your gear sucks I am guessing .

Well blow Me away, you get what I'm saying now, war bow is crap, hence, crap damage!

Holy crap. How can you say novelty is no damage that's just nonsense. It's all about the gear and the str multiplier, your novelty does bad damage cause your gear sucks I am guessing .

Well blow Me away, you get what I'm saying now, war bow is crap, hence, crap damage!

You misunderstand. And maybe you have great dps gear I don't know . Equip it with your carpet or sled then tell me novelty damage is crap.