Celtic Heroes

I don't wanna see straight elemental damage on Dragonscale. I think it's got to be some elemental and some melee (pierce/crush/slash).

Pierce/crush/slash is variable depending on your stats, elemental damage isn't.

Where are you getting that from Fro?

ROGUES AND RANGERS ARMOUR SHOULD BE BETTER THAN RADIANT FOR DPS. Warriors Dragonscale should offer some damage, but shouldn't out-do Radiant.

Warriors should be able to do some damage but not compare. You expect and want too much Fromen. You want warriors to rival the dps of rogues and rangers which is insane.. It's same old thing every post, you trying to defend your opinions that no one else agrees with.

I was just adding pierce my mistake can be poison damage or elemental for rogues and rangers damage .

Make all warrior full tanks add only 1/2 of the damage to armor the rogue and ranger in the that will traslate.
If rogue have 300 add damage and warriors have 150 . The rogue will hit. 150+ per hit and the warrior will hit 75 per hit thats sound awesome . At current delays 2 warrior hits are in the same time frame then 3 rogue hits

The armor of rogue will add in 3 hits 450 in the same amount time the warriors only add 2 hits 150 and you got be lvl 180 . Upgrade the armor 4 times . To add less damage then a current offhand blade.

Even in the same damage a warrior will never out dps a rogue if you believe so well ...


Yes im been a close mind idiot and Im sorry ....
.

I think a big problem here is some are taking some suggestion for warriors and think they mean to make warriors compare with dps of rogues or rangers when in fact they just want to keep the heavy hitting damage they have. What i mean is warriors should have the highest melee damage this is clear as their weapons are all stronger then rangers or rogues but rangers and rogues should have more dps because of the weapon speed. Also saying warrior are only tanks is incorrect they are the best class with armor and skills to do it this is fact cant argue it but if OTM truely intended warriors only role was to be tank 2handed weapons would have never been placed in the game. As these weapons solo purpose is to make warriors the heavy hitters ( not saying dps just highest melee) at the cost of being a better tank. Players are the ones who decided warriors are only tanks but the game wasnt completely designed for this. All i want for my warrior is to keep its decent damage not to compete with dps of rogues or ranger. If warriors arent given some damage onto their armor while rogues and rangers are warriors cant compete with the damage which shouldnt be the case.

I think a big problem here is some are taking some suggestion for warriors and think they mean to make warriors compare with dps of rogues or rangers when in fact they just want to keep the heavy hitting damage they have. What i mean is warriors should have the highest melee damage this is clear as their weapons are all stronger then rangers or rogues but rangers and rogues should have more dps because of the weapon speed. Also saying warrior are only tanks is incorrect they are the best class with armor and skills to do it this is fact cant argue it but if OTM truely intended warriors only role was to be tank 2handed weapons would have never been placed in the game. As these weapons solo purpose is to make warriors the heavy hitters ( not saying dps just highest melee) at the cost of being a better tank. Players are the ones who decided warriors are only tanks but the game wasnt completely designed for this. All i want for my warrior is to keep its decent damage not to compete with dps of rogues or ranger. If warriors arent given some damage onto their armor while rogues and rangers are warriors cant compete with the damage which shouldnt be the case.

I kind agree with you , but the original poster want it dragon armor to have close stats to ES radiant so if we by equal will be 200 elemental damage but only for rangers and rogues but been better should be 300 rogues and 250 rangers. Thats the op idea and all and maybe 200 elemental to the spell for mages , but druids their only got be healers and warriors only armor/ tanking boost . And they call me egoist.

Not close to radiant.. Better and not elemental damage. We want some pierce dmg and different types of damage, not an upgraded radiant.

Does nobody realize that earthstone is gunna suck if the new mobs are made properly with better resistances?

Does nobody realize that earthstone is gunna suck if the new mobs are made properly with better resistances?

Problably high heat defense but then again are underground and undead creatures prop weak to heat and magic. ....

Not close to radiant.. Better and not elemental damage. We want some pierce dmg and different types of damage, not an upgraded radiant.

I dont get you i put pierce damage and close to 300 for rogues and 250 for rangers and 225 for warriors and you flip , but dps will never be affected because the ratio of weapon speed is even to 1.5:1 lol and that will never change . Will always be 33% more dps from a rogue and 10% from a ranger......