And I remember the post about armor Fro , your claim was because of bark other classes can have high armor , you made no reference to armors depreciating value post 500 , don't try and rewrite history . that post wasn't about how bad armor was it was about how bad warrior dps was .
This whole armor is no good thing isn't from you , you jumped on the coattails .
Your theory about warriors doing lower damage than rogue/ranger with same numbers has NOT been proven at all , stop acting like it has please .
Re: i might start a ranger because.....
#62And I remember the post about armor Fro , your claim was because of bark other classes can have high armor , you made no reference to armors depreciating value post 500 , don't try and rewrite history . that post wasn't about how bad armor was it was about how bad warrior dps was .
This whole armor is no good thing isn't from you , you jumped on the coattails .
Your theory about warriors doing lower damage than rogue/ranger with same numbers has NOT been proven at all , stop acting like it has please .
I said prove me wrong i dont have issue with that 2 players other then me Prove armor plateu been too low. And pvp and pve to be almost the same .
But you choose to attack me and used to it , i mean i have keep my same postures over time i can link 10 or so post where you guys flip flop , i love the one druids. whole forums community saying druids dont need energy reduction .... Now they do ....
Like i said prove me wrong about the low fluctuation with numbers and extense testing i have done it , do you have ?
And again why the OP doesnt ask about making a warrior?
Inactive player .
En este juego , mientras tanto otros juegos se llevan mi plata.
En este juego , mientras tanto otros juegos se llevan mi plata.
Re: i might start a ranger because.....
#63Lol I didn't attack you .
Did you test with same weapon ? Or slash vs pierce on a mob that you seriously have no clue as to it's resistances ?
Did you test with same weapon ? Or slash vs pierce on a mob that you seriously have no clue as to it's resistances ?
Re: i might start a ranger because.....
#64Lol I didn't attack you .
Did you test with same weapon ? Or slash vs pierce on a mob that you seriously have no clue as to it's resistances ?
If you put the equal weapon the will be pierce the egde will be to rogues/rangers , if the resistance is higher on slash still hidden nerfted base on resistance its same just different way only mob bosses the warriors have egde is golems all other pierce have better damage.( and please dont come and said equipped a spear because that will take the last good think about warriors diversity of weapons)
Test was done. With spears and frozen weapons at lvl 60 guards , lvl100 guards, lvl 140, lvl 140 wyerns. 1 player class at time. With same elemental damage offhand .
So if you want said is higher resistance or low end fluctuation still the same Warriros hit less ......
Inactive player .
En este juego , mientras tanto otros juegos se llevan mi plata.
En este juego , mientras tanto otros juegos se llevan mi plata.
Re: i might start a ranger because.....
#65So you tested with same attack and damage numbers with the same weapon and warrior was hitting for less ?
Re: i might start a ranger because.....
#66So you tested with same attack and damage numbers with the same weapon and warrior was hitting for less ?
Yes did with same spear and radiant attack rings to even out attack -/+ 50 attack diference , cruel knife or any multi class weapon (sword/hammer) attack will to low on classes who dont have ability.
Like i said do your own test ...... Flesh mobs should be the same resistance for pierce/slash but is common knowlegde the kelpies,wyerns,and eyes and ghost ,pierce is better so get my point even if you want blame higher resistance i mean most warriors are slash quest weapon is slash .
But still asking why he original poster only take 3 classes in considerstion to play ? I mean why no warriors, did you read fb page why you start playing x class ..... Lol more rogues and rangers then any other class. And few players the said tanks ( no even warriors) and nobody see issue as warriors no been apeallin to be a main class ( yes we know you have lvl 150 tank )
Inactive player .
En este juego , mientras tanto otros juegos se llevan mi plata.
En este juego , mientras tanto otros juegos se llevan mi plata.
Re: i might start a ranger because.....
#67Ffs Fro the op is a 75 rogue , his post makes no sense at all , it's just regurgitated forum banter .