Celtic Heroes

How about you start warning people that have inappropriate signature such as gif sigs example follows

Animations of a person throwing and punching snakes in a room.
A person jumping on a bean bag that has a cat on it which is then flung across the room?

Huh? :|

If the new rule concerning picture size is only "Do not have an image in your signature which is larger than 500 x 150 pixels", then I think you should be more specific. Otherwise this is becoming a loophole where people can put more than 1 picture of that size.

Point taken, I'll ammend the rule so as to close that loophole.

Thanks for bringing it up!

I've changed the rule regarding image sizes to the following:

Do not have an images in your signature where the total size of the images is greater than 500 x 150 pixels.

Do you think that works better?

I've changed the rule regarding image sizes to the following:

Do not have an images in your signature where the total size of the images is greater than 500 x 150 pixels.

Do you think that works better?

At this moment in time, I personally can't think of a better way than that to say it, except to put it bluntly:

Do not use a large or multiple photos that create unnecessary scrolling for other forum users. Specifically, a single 500 x 150 sized picture would be an acceptable picture size to use in one's signature.

Or something along those lines.

Scammers , account sellers and account traders will love the new forum rules!

gotta agree with Elim. OTM just gave scammers and account sellers, full immunity. What gives OTM?

When he said that thought he was being sarcastic, yeah, what gives? :s

Scammers , account sellers and account traders will love the new forum rules!

gotta agree with Elim. OTM just gave scammers and account sellers, full immunity. What gives OTM?

I do think that its kind of giving scammers and the lot the ability to hide away, but if you think about it the point of the rule(s) is to prevent hate on the forums, no matter who it is directed at. You could also look at it as trying to get the most out of the forums - the most constructive feedback you can get.

I'm not siding with the shady type, I do think the rules may need some slight change, but I'm just pointing that out.

gotta agree with Elim. OTM just gave scammers and account sellers, full immunity. What gives OTM?

We haven't given scammers any immunity. We would rather that players use the in-game support tool to report scammers and account sellers rather than posting their names on the forum.

Scamming and account trading is an issue that is present in the game, not the forums, and as such we feel it should be reported and dealt with in-game. Accusing people here on the forums simply presents the opportunity for insults and abuse, and I for one do not want our forums to become such a place.

I've changed the rule regarding image sizes to the following:

Do not have an images in your signature where the total size of the images is greater than 500 x 150 pixels.

Do you think that works better?

Now this is one of the new rules that works for me.

Scammers , account sellers and account traders will love the new forum rules!

gotta agree with Elim. OTM just gave scammers and account sellers, full immunity. What gives OTM?

+1

Scamming, selling accounts, etc. is an issue for Support to handle. These rules are to prevent constant griping on the forum. How many topics have been locked or removed in the past month alone because people have gotten out of hand bashing one another in a he said she said battle? These rules are to keep everyone civil in discussions, nothing more and nothing less. Anyone who is found without a reasonable doubt to be scamming, selling accounts, etc. will ultimately in the end get their just reward from Support. Let's face it, has bashing each other on here honestly done a single productive thing to eliminate scamming, selling accounts, etc.? The simple answer is no, it hasn't.