Celtic Heroes

I don't remember the last time Alexxxx tanked Agg, it's been a long while...

And because I'm sick and tired of lies being spread around, ask Cerb if this isn't his kik and if he did not in fact say this.

I have a dumb question - who started this aggy rules change and who got the group together?

In the thread Aly requested to be locked, BKs last post said he was not the one pushing for this and did not invite one person to meet on it. That leads me to ask , Who did????

It sure seems like nobody besides cook, aly, and RR have defended this post in which all of epona is standing up in protest.

I can't really comment on the fighting rules seeing how i don't fight Aggy.(Before someone makes a comment i just said I don't fight it).I can however share my opinion.I have only fought him once to which only highest druids were Kasey and my Zenonia 133.Druids were way lower lowest being 99.The 99 rolled a 98 on my 130 trident drop and got it.To me it was unfair being cannot equip for 31 lvls.Drop was given to tank which i understood it wasn't easy and for some of us it was the first time seeing him go up wall. Aggy was even harder then i am told and not many were 150. As far as this new rule what about the ones who can't lvl to 140? As i said i do not fight him.One of my druids just hit 135 and if someone told me i had to lvl it to 140 to be in battle i would purposely stay 135.The reason one shouldn't tell someone your excluded for 5 lvls. I have seen some 130's druids heal better the 140 up.Did lvl 140 druids get u all to 150? So it's ok to use them to get higher but as long as it involves a drop isn't wanted under 140? Only if none are "available" i prob would say kiss my....When did this game become about "must"lvl.Whatever happened to lvling at your own pace and not fighting over drops. I stopped grouping altogether but just now i tanked Rocklanche and thought, "Wow been while since i had fun."I miss old Epona where it didn't matter much what lvl u were it was how u played the game.Now i log do quest and talk to others.No one can even talk on forums without arguement.

PS Tanking became fun again

Everyone has always seemed cool with the tank deciding the rules, so would it be an issue if all the tanks got together and decided on consistent rules? I think including more than just tanks was a good idea. I have seen fights where there is debate about who rolls and how many times after the kill, and that is really unfair. People should know ahead of time so they can decide based on their roll potential whether to participate. The idea to have consistent rules is a great idea, in my opinion, for that reason.

Clearly there is still a need to debate what rules we settle on - if we can do that without personal attacks this can be really productive and be the good thing I'm certain it was intended to be. Otherwise we go back to having the one person (the tank) stuck with (yes stuck with, I don't envy the position) setting the rules at each fight.

We need a ****ing round table, but we'll have to make due discussing it here or organize another kik group if the representatives can be agreed upon.

/two cents

It sure seems like nobody besides cook, aly, and RR have defended this post in which all of epona is standing up in protest.

I don't think anyone minds having a civil discussion about what the rules should be if they're unpopular, but dissing someone about things entirely off topic are not a good way to start a conversation. I do not like the way Stella went about this post because she started off with misconceptions, and it seems was almost looking to start a fight. Of course people who are being unrightfully bashed are going to be defensive. So maybe if everyone can stop poking at each other, this will move somewhere without further drama.

Now I can put my own piece in. . .140+ dps is fair due to the main reason for being there is to do damage, less than 140+ damage is nerfed to the extreme. This has been agreed upon as fair at many aggs past when the tank set the rules. As far a druids go, 120+ druids have a new skill cap which makes them more effective than 120- as well as agg drops having a 120 req. Druid ARE needed for agg, I have never denied this claim, nor did I ever say that the agg post 100% reflected my personal ideas, as I said before, it was a group discussion and I was perfectly fine with 120/130 druids being allowed in.

next time please dont confuse your words with mine and make out i said it. Thank you.