Celtic Heroes

You are right in saying If I wanted more resist, I can invest in wards or get a shield but that's not my point.

Yes its a paper cloth but its a fantasy game where items are infused with supposedly magic properties. Not to mention these are warden, meteor frozen items which are infused with secret mojos. Same degree as why would a heroic glove make your attack speed increase by 30%? Its just a glove?
If a glove can infuse with such benefits, why is it so hard to believe a paper cloth from legendary quest items can be infused to with stand higher resistance?

U cant have one way or the other.

I am not complaing about it giving resistances but let me ask you this.

Why should druids and mages get more of a bonus then they already have... Between them they are the best support classes a druid has killed an aggy twice and mages are the best dps and now you asking for more resistances let me tell you where that will lead... Tanking!! No dont give them anything. You have range abaility if you are annoyed about dieing so much put some friggin points in vit!

This will only go bad each armour is enchanted by the same quests and same people thats why all resist are the same! The reason armour is not cause 1 is a paper cloth other is a suit of full blown armour... If mages and druid had more fire resist they would be tanking its not a good idea it will overpower a class.

Let me stress this. I don't die heaps from bossing, I have sufficient vit, I dont pvp mages or druids.I am not asking for more damage, more recast speed, this for me is all about making casters more realistic to the roles itself.

In terms of tanking, druids and mages will never outshine Warriors.
Say a druid has 200 more elemental resistance than a warrior. Is he able to tank any of the OW bosses or meteor bosses any better than a tank warrior? I would say no due to:

Frozen Armour - Druid 200 Armour vs Warrior 575 Armour
Armour health bonus - Druid 210 health vs Warrior 409 health
Skill difference - lv 30 bark 379 Armour vs lv 30 PS 509 Armour

Difference of 500 Armour and 200 health which is a ton. Point is casters will never outshine warriors tank position. They may try to do tanking but its a silly attempt.

And i don't consider this a bonus as its hows casters are meant to be. We are weak against melee attacks but we are stronger against spells. This to me is as much realistic / common sense as to your believe of cloth / Armour. Note I am not saying yr wrong but I wouldn't consider mine wrong as well.

I think class differences should be big
Warrior loads of armour poor damage output
Rogue ok armour ok damage close attacks
Ranger ok armour ok damage range attacks
Druid poor armour great healer damage should be higher than what it is as it dont get used in boss fights anyway
Mage poor armour great dps
I play mage and am happy with damage output from mine
I have tried other classes worst one ive tried was def rogue but i didnt have gloves of speed so that may have scewed the result
And poor old druids there fine if there in group healing but there damage output is so poor they literally can't level on there own

I think class differences should be big
Warrior loads of armour poor damage output
Rogue ok armour ok damage close attacks
Ranger ok armour ok damage range attacks
Druid poor armour great healer damage should be higher than what it is as it dont get used in boss fights anyway
Mage poor armour great dps
I play mage and am happy with damage output from mine
I have tried other classes worst one ive tried was def rogue but i didnt have gloves of speed so that may have scewed the result
And poor old druids there fine if there in group healing but there damage output is so poor they literally can't level on there own

Well I hate your mage statement. Completely insane. Mages top dps? My ass. Rogues are meant to be to be top dps. And hence, they are. Not mages, yall are mix of support and dps. Hence your lures. Rogues, we are dps. All of our skills are dps or dodging. Soooo yea. Learn to mechanics of an MMO before making statements. Idk if this was an innocent post. Im sorry if it was. But that pissed me off quite a bit. I honestly hate people who think that. Mages get a little taste of dps and think they should be top dps. No. Just because Yall whined so hard to get a huge boost doesnt mean anything. Still pissed mages whined THAT hard 6 months ago or so. Definitely made the classes unbalanced. Sorry about this post. But geeze.

Try to keep the argument (if it is one) as cooled as possible please.

I think class differences should be big
Warrior loads of armour poor damage output
Rogue ok armour ok damage close attacks
Ranger ok armour ok damage range attacks
Druid poor armour great healer damage should be higher than what it is as it dont get used in boss fights anyway
Mage poor armour great dps
I play mage and am happy with damage output from mine
I have tried other classes worst one ive tried was def rogue but i didnt have gloves of speed so that may have scewed the result
And poor old druids there fine if there in group healing but there damage output is so poor they literally can't level on there own

Dude, i have the name WARRIOR for a reason! We need to do DPS, just not as much as Rogue. I warrior is a fierce fighter and should be resiliant, but also should be able to do great DPS. Just not like Rogues becausr Rogues hit so much faster. Thats like having me tickle you with a sword. If you want warriors to do no damage then give me a mainhand that makes me invincible and no need for druids , thats basically the comparison here.

Try to keep the argument (if it is one) as cooled as possible please.

No just heated. Hate comments like that.

Rogues should get a dmg boost with their armour, besides dmg were kinda useless

Rogues should get a dmg boost with their armour, besides dmg were kinda useless

Damn straight. New armour should add that.