Let's say a random person came to your house and stole your television. This guy went to the pawn shop and sold it for quite cheap. Does this make the pawn shop suspicious? Maybe a bit, but as an owner of a pawn shop you would know that sometimes people come in and sell their because they either don't know what they are worth, or they are desperate for cash. Naturally the pawn shop purchases the television. So when a friend heard your television was stolen and happened to see the pawn shop selling it, he purchased it and returned it to you. The pawn shop is under no obligation whatsoever to refund your friend his entire cost to buy it, or anyone for that matter. Nor is the pawn shop required to refund the profit they made.This is exactly the point, Cas. The purchaser either knew (if you accept Viru's information as true) or should have known that the camo was stolen. Thus, making him culpable as a purchaser of stolen property.You can only be punished for buying and selling stolen property if you knew or should have known that it was stolen.
Why should he have known? Because 1) NO ONE sells a camo charm! and 2) ABSOLUTELY NO FREAKING WAY anyone sells a camo charm for 1 million gold!! Indeed, there were people approached by the purchaser who attempted to sell the stolen camo charm for various amounts of money who refused to buy it precisely because the transaction smelled.
By people asking for the friend who bought to get a complete refund, you're asking a pawn shop to give a person that television for free simply because it happened to be stolen.
Seeing such a cheap item being sold would make most people anxious to buy it and they would not pass judgement as to why that item is so cheap. This person we've been discussing is a human being. We are all prone to mistakes. He did what he could to correct it and refunded the profits he made when he had no reason to. Did it to be more fair. He did not have the same cause as Azz to give the item back to Gin: Neek had no idea who Gin is, Azz has known him for well over a year. So he acted the same as nearly every person would have, since few would have purchased the expensive television in the above analogy just to give it to a random stranger that had their television stolen.
Once this person was over the euphoria of finding such a cheap buy, he did sell it to make money, yes. And when he learned it was scammed, there wasn't a whole ton he could do anyways, is there? He couldn't refund it to the scammer and make it all go away, and had no cause to give it away for free, given he had no idea who the original owner even was. So instead he sold it rather cheap, instead of the 3-5mil he could have easily gotten for it. Not only did the person he sold it to have cause enough to return it free of charge, but also the person got the profits that had been made off of him, and so he ended up paying exactly what the scammer sold it for, despite the unintended middleman.
As does every leader of anything ever haha.Being chief is not easy and Heli is trying to do his best. Sometime he succeeds, sometimes he fails.