Celtic Heroes

Well each class has there advantages its also how they are set up and what skills they use I can take people higher level than me but Some have better gear and whoop me.

So in the end each class can have a build for pvp that can be incredible but for warriors the difference is our incredible build is our natural build while others would be required to reskill and restat giving the illusion warriors are op.

Except that for other classes to be good at pvp it requires 12-25k each match (reskill to particular opponent then either back or to next different opponent) whereas warriors don't need to do anythin. Even after these reskills to best a specific opponent its not like you are way better maybe just even. So I'm sticking with op in pvp because gold isn't somethin you can ignore.

In general warriors are pretty good and balanced IMO it's just in pvp we need some tweaking. The last round of tweaks opened up as many problems as it solved.

So in the end each class can have a build for pvp that can be incredible but for warriors the difference is our incredible build is our natural build while others would be required to reskill and restat giving the illusion warriors are op.

Except that for other classes to be good at pvp it requires 12-25k each match (reskill to particular opponent then either back or to next different opponent) whereas warriors don't need to do anythin. Even after these reskills to best a specific opponent its not like you are way better maybe just even. So I'm sticking with op in pvp because gold isn't somethin you can ignore.

In general warriors are pretty good and balanced IMO it's just in pvp we need some tweaking. The last round of tweaks opened up as many problems as it solved.

as i said though the only difference is that our natural build happens to be our great pvp build in every game ive played with pvp this wasnt the case but currently in ch it is. I also said other classes have to reskill and restat to make their pvp build. If we had to say anything this really shows how useless a dps warrior is because there isnt enough incentive to have a warrior reskill for pvp thats ends up being bad for their real role.

You guys are all crazy. It isnt based on class, its based on build. You get beat by warriors because they are full tank while you arnt. Anyone could stand a fair chance against a warrior if they were all vitality.

True, as a rogue I have tons of hp and can beat most warriors my level.
I have 3500 health, 950 damage, and 90 defense.

Whats gay is that I can beat people 10 lvls higher, any class but mages and warrior, but i can bearly beat a warriro 10 lvl under me like any warrior no matter their gear. And im a ranger with a great build and good gear. That is what ticks me off

A rogue never came close to killing my warrior. I am 9# warrioror was it pvp in epona. Druids never win I carry a running speed. I do full vit at level 83 I have wardens shirt, met pants, helm and gloves and boots. diamond sword. I tell you what! Golden blade, shatter, giant swing, pro stance (like a second bp which no class can do) double attack. I only get beat by warriors and only one singlemage. He ran though and his attacks were strong and I died by one more hit.

+1

Warriors got dps just as good as rogues (thanks to shatter and rupture) while having insane armor. They are just simply op.

Lol are we playing the same game here? Warriors don't have dps anywhere near a rogues, sure they might wreck you in a couple hits in a duel but other than that the dps isn't great.

+1

Warriors got dps just as good as rogues (thanks to shatter and rupture) while having insane armor. They are just simply op.

Flutter

I might just have a rubbish warrior, but.... I am not sure that warrior dps is in the same bracket as rogues at all. Rogues and mages are boss at dps. Plenty of advantages to a warrior but killing bosses/mobs fastest doesn't seem one of them. Gl
d5

She's referring to pvp, and pvp only.