Celtic Heroes

to plus3,

YOU DENY THE EVIDENCE!!! YOU TELL ME HOW WHAT I SAID AT AROUND PAGE 52 IS NOT EVIDENCE!!! YOU SHOW ME MORE EVIDENCE!!! I HAVE NO FEAR OF WHAT IS REAL YOU MORON!!! YOU ARE THE ONE WITH THE FEAR!!! EVOLUTION IS A DELUSION!!! HELP ME!?!?! YOU ARE THE ONE THAT NEEDS HELP!!! DONT JUST SAY THAT I HAVE A FEAR, SHOW ME THAT I HAVE A FEAR OF WHAT IS REAL!!! YOU DENY AND MOCK, THEN YOU SAY THAT IT IS A FACT WHILE SHOWING NO REAL EVIDENCE!!! JUST BECAUSE SPECIES HAVE SIMILAR DNA DOES NOT MEAN THAT EVOLUTION IS TRUE!!! LOOK AT MY POSTS CONCERNING THIS NON EVIDENCE!!! THEN YOU MAKE THESE ASSUMPTIONS OF WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG FOR A BEING TO DO WHILE LOOKING AT THE COMMON VIEW!!! YOU ARE THE MOST IGNORANT LOCKED ON MOCKING MORON THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY ENTIRE LIFE!

to OTM, i said this to try to get it through his head that he is not discussing what i am saying and just mocking. i am sorry if it is inappropriate so you can delete this if you want to.

You didn't even post on page 52. How am I supposed to take you seriously when you don't know what you even posted?

And yes DNA being related in the way it is - so perfectly with no anomalies IS evidence. If you can't see that you don't know what evidence is.

Again please face your fears. Not for me for the good of yourself.

oops, its on page 59. the DNA is only evidence if you interpret it as evidence, and IMO things like that should not be used for evidence. i face my fears in things like this more than you know, and, even if science supports evolution which it does not, that would still not change my view, because there is far more than that.

Magixal, again, you are just saying that evolution is fact while showing no facts, and you do not even understand the Bible and its purpose and how it works, and i will admit that there are things that common Christianity cannot explain, and i think that alot of the doctrine is BS, but at least they have a general belief in God. i think i have explanations for "baby murder", the supposed hatred against blacks which i do not, but i will not even attempt to explain, you are just a wall and will not respond, like with my other posts unless you had something to say.

this is my last post that i will post in this topic, so if i do not respond it is not because i do not have answers, but because i have chosen not to. any one that wants to further ask questions or argue with me can PM me, but i do not expect to hear from these people named Magixal and Plus3, because they have a fear that they might be wrong.

I edited to add content while you posted. Oops

The argument was for a world flood but the only non Christian non-bible evidence was related to the Black Sea flood.

Now I would totally be in board with the Doctor saving all the life with his bad ass time travel device. Cause he's cool like that. In fact I bet it was tom baker. Unfortunately all evidence was destroyed in the last time war leaving us all to ponder if it really is sci-fi or history! The world may never know.

Lol, ya. I guess my post is a tad redundant now... :/

oops, its on page 59. the DNA is only evidence if you interpret it as evidence, and IMO things like that should not be used for evidence. i face my fears in things like this more than you know, and, even if science supports evolution which it does not, that would still not change my view, because there is far more than that.

This makes no sense and tbh makes you sound like a complete moron...

I havent read the most recent posts but, CARS have nothing to do with religion. STOP bringing CARS in as evidence!

Also at God murdering Babies. Sure Ok. The population was lower at the time too. There wasnt 3 babies being born every second then. Maybe 1 an hour at the most.

Also stop calling us out for dodging questions when you are the ones doing so.

The Bible, as I said before, is meant to be interpreted. Although its interpreted in the same way, thats its meaning.

You all seem to be in a dilemma!
Quick, call liberty medical!
They'll answer your questions, find solutions to your problems and help you live a better life!

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8GQ2P5-NucM

I'm not saying that u should ignore the Old Testament. I was saying that since Jesus died on the cross for us, we do not have to obey the Law(the law of the Old Testament i mean) anymore. It is more the New Testament that u should be quoting from. The New Testament does not tell us to hate gay people. Am I saying that there r not Christians who may hate gays or blacks? No. But they are sinning if they do. But what i am trying to say is that the laws of the Old Testament are not applicable unless they are quoted in the New Testament. And the New Testament does tell us to love our neighbors( meaning everyone) as ourselves.

I'm not saying that u should ignore the Old Testament. I was saying that since Jesus died on the cross for us, we do not have to obey the Law(the law of the Old Testament i mean) anymore. It is more the New Testament that u should be quoting from. The New Testament does not tell us to hate gay people. Am I saying that there r not Christians who may hate gays or blacks? No. But they are sinning if they do. But what i am trying to say is that the laws of the Old Testament are not applicable unless they are quoted in the New Testament. And the New Testament does tell us to love our neighbors( meaning everyone) as ourselves.

So I never really understood why people believe this. Did Christ mislead his followers for the first 1600 years? How could he die on the cross - then have people believe one set of scripture for 1600 years (killing gays the whole time) - then suddenly switch? Why the change 1.6 millennia in? What possible reasons would be given for a human king in Europe to make such sweeping changes to the direct word of god?

As it stands Christianity as whole has been advocating killing gays for 80% of their history and only recently has come around to thinking there may be a moral problem with this.

Oh and since Jesus was obviously Arabic it makes me laugh every time I see a hardcore racist Christian (non-Arab) who hates Arabs. Gives me a good laugh.

I havent read the most recent posts but, CARS have nothing to do with religion. STOP bringing CARS in as evidence!

Also at God murdering Babies. Sure Ok. The population was lower at the time too. There wasnt 3 babies being born every second then. Maybe 1 an hour at the most.

Also stop calling us out for dodging questions when you are the ones doing so.

The Bible, as I said before, is meant to be interpreted. Although its interpreted in the same way, thats its meaning.

How its interpreted? So you are saying that in Leviticus, you can take the quote "if a man lays down with another man it is a sin. And they shall be conndemned to death" (not actual quote btw. Just a brief summery) that literally cannot be interpreted in any other way, besides the idea. Kill gay people.

I havent read the most recent posts but, CARS have nothing to do with religion. STOP bringing CARS in as evidence!

Also at God murdering Babies. Sure Ok. The population was lower at the time too. There wasnt 3 babies being born every second then. Maybe 1 an hour at the most.

Also stop calling us out for dodging questions when you are the ones doing so.

The Bible, as I said before, is meant to be interpreted. Although its interpreted in the same way, thats its meaning.

How its interpreted? So you are saying that in Leviticus, you can take the quote "if a man lays down with another man it is a sin. And they shall be conndemned to death" (not actual quote btw. Just a brief summery) that literally cannot be interpreted in any other way, besides the idea. Kill gay people.

All the baby murder, genocide, homophobia, intolerance, slavery, etc in the bible is cherry picked out by people that realize its bs. It's just sad they won't go that one step further and let that whole rotten tree go back to the earth. Apparently the sedimental value is too much.

I'm not saying that u should ignore the Old Testament. I was saying that since Jesus died on the cross for us, we do not have to obey the Law(the law of the Old Testament i mean) anymore. It is more the New Testament that u should be quoting from. The New Testament does not tell us to hate gay people. Am I saying that there r not Christians who may hate gays or blacks? No. But they are sinning if they do. But what i am trying to say is that the laws of the Old Testament are not applicable unless they are quoted in the New Testament. And the New Testament does tell us to love our neighbors( meaning everyone) as ourselves.

So I never really understood why people believe this. Did Christ mislead his followers for the first 1600 years? How could he die on the cross - then have people believe one set of scripture for 1600 years (killing gays the whole time) - then suddenly switch? Why the change 1.6 millennia in? What possible reasons would be given for a human king in Europe to make such sweeping changes to the direct word of god?

As it stands Christianity as whole has been advocating killing gays for 80% of their history and only recently has come around to thinking there may be a moral problem with this.

Oh and since Jesus was obviously Arabic it makes me laugh every time I see a hardcore racist Christian (non-Arab) who hates Arabs. Gives me a good laugh.

It seems to me that u have never read the bible. The first law was in place for the Jews and those Gentiles who decided to become Jews(this means that the gentile agreed to follow the Jewish traditions). Also the reason that the first law was in place was because of sin. That is why the Jews sacrificed animals; to hide their sins. When Jesus died on the cross, because He was perfect and His dying wiped away our sins, it took away the need for the law. The new law was for Christians to follow. I will admit that many atrocities were committed in the name of Christ. These were wrong. The Bible teaches love not hate. Show me where, in the New Testament, it says to hate gays, blacks, Arabs, and adulterers. It tells is to show them love. They should not be allowed to be a member of the church, however. Another thing u aske was why God would tell His people to kill of other countries. This was because He was punishing the people who lived in those countries. You ask what kind of God would do this and you say that it is not fair. Actually it is more than fair. All of us ( all of us, even Christians and any true Christian should tell you this) deserve to go to hell. I mean think about it. Assuming He is real, He is all-powerful and always right and He created us. If we disobey Him that is rebellion. He would be perfectly right in killing all of us and yet He did not.

Another thing evolutionists should think about: If you guys are right and i am wrong then when i die i just stop existing. Not really a punishment, right? Well, just think. If somehow, someway i am right, then you go to hell for eternity. For me its a win/win situation. What is it for u?