I have no idea where the idea that God is real because of lack of disproving evidence sprouted. Wherever it did, that is obviously bad logic. You can define something, but does that mean it exists? Of course not. Take points, lines, and planes for example. They are believed to exist and defined, but that does not mean that they absolutely exist. You can define an element that you imagine, but does that prove it to be a part of reality? Lack of disapproving evidence is not even a hypothesis. It is a subtle observation. I will say this once again for hopefully the last time - we cannot prove God with our finite human mind. It is impossible, as he is omnipotent, omniscient, and infinite.Love how Christians choose to not respond when I say " they say god is real due to lack of dis-proving evidence, if so, can the same be said for a murderer?" Just shows that Christians are stumbling head over heels about it.
Re: A discussion about religion
#871x*Warrior Tank*x
x*Arawn*x
x*BadaBing*x
Critical thinking greatly intrigues me.
x*Arawn*x
x*BadaBing*x
Critical thinking greatly intrigues me.