Celtic Heroes

The Official Forum for Celtic Heroes, the 3D MMORPG for iOS and Android Devices

Re: mage dont need to move up the list guys

#11
Look on the highest hits list...Just look at it.
I dont care if The rogues are all strength because most rogues are basically all strength whether they try to max hit or not.

I have started the thread that lead two other like this to start. But I did not, i repeat not, say rogues are overpowered.

In a group of all classes, things may go well, but that does not mean the mage did anything. The group would also do fine without the mage. Notice how these groups work (WITH NO MAGE)...

1) 1 warrior, 3 druids
2) 1 warrior, 1 druid, 4 rogues
3) 2 warriors, 3 rangers

Now look at this group: 4 mages, 1 druid

IT DOESNT WORK THAT WAY

People always say, "Mages are good because they have cloak of fire" or "You have energy shield"
I want to tear apart their mobile device! that is so ignorant.
Cloak of fire brings mages up to par in terms of dps, if even that high. Its not even damage from the mage if its on a diff character.
I wont even start with energy shield...
A group could do fine without any class. All you need is 1 person to take the hits the rest is optional. I solod lord icefist once, no group. Sure it took alot of pots, but was a group required? nope. 8-)
World - Sulis
Clan - Toxic

H3ROsRogue - lvl 220 rogue
H3ROsRanger - lvl 200 ranger
H3ROsMage - lvl 220 mage
H3ROsDruid - lvl 220 druid
H3ROsWarrior - lvl 200 warrior
H3ROsLocker - lvl 190 rogue

Can't imagine losing kills to a ranger in 2019.

Re: mage dont need to move up the list guys

#13
Look on the highest hits list...Just look at it.
I dont care if The rogues are all strength because most rogues are basically all strength whether they try to max hit or not.

I have started the thread that lead two other like this to start. But I did not, i repeat not, say rogues are overpowered.

In a group of all classes, things may go well, but that does not mean the mage did anything. The group would also do fine without the mage. Notice how these groups work (WITH NO MAGE)...

1) 1 warrior, 3 druids
2) 1 warrior, 1 druid, 4 rogues
3) 2 warriors, 3 rangers

Now look at this group: 4 mages, 1 druid

IT DOESNT WORK THAT WAY

People always say, "Mages are good because they have cloak of fire" or "You have energy shield"
I want to tear apart their mobile device! that is so ignorant.
Cloak of fire brings mages up to par in terms of dps, if even that high. Its not even damage from the mage if its on a diff character.
I wont even start with energy shield...
A group could do fine without any class. All you need is 1 person to take the hits the rest is optional. I solod lord icefist once, no group. Sure it took alot of pots, but was a group required? nope. 8-)
Wow your an idiot, Soloing means you alone, as in, Your Character, Your Armor, Your Weapons, Your Skills, PERIOD. Using pots is not soloing, i laugh when people think they are cool by using loads of pots on a boss, i have nothing against it, but that said, it is not something to be proud of its ignorant to act proud by using pots to solo bosses.

Re: mage dont need to move up the list guys

#14
I disagree, mages do need to move up rankes because I hate whn all the rogues come and ks you or even warriors. I'm lvl 92 and I still get ks in a heart beat. My server is full of rogues and yes it sucks getting ks every second. If mages were evenly matched with rogues that would make this the best game ever

Re: mage dont need to move up the list guys

#15
:)
I just had to post here.



How the heck is a Mage balanced? Or even close.


Druids:Heal

Warriors: Tank

Rogues: DPS

Ranger: All round and Can bolas

Mages: out powered by rouges DPS and it's skills included, out powered by warrior, and put powered by ranger. So how is this balanced? Even with cloak, it's no where near as useful as a rogue is. sneaky and giant swing can't WAY overpower a ice shard lured both maxed. Do your research before posting please.
The only part i see in this is agreeing with spirit :) rouges are an extremely powerful DPS class and can overpower any direct damage spell from a mage.
-Morrigan-
Cronic, 143 Mage
Ninjastar, 127 Rouge
TheDarkSide, 67 Druid

Tada gan iarracht.

Re: mage dont need to move up the list guys

#16
you guys dont understand my point.

You say a group would be fine without mage.
a goup would be fine without a druid also
would be fine without rogue or ranger also

so... ? :?


And to comment spirithealer...

Soloing something means killing without anyone else. You use pots? Thats a solo as long as you got nobody helping you. :|

And yes I use lots of pots exp pots elixers super haste elixers scrolls sigls backpack expansions energy pots super combo elixers super travel pots and idols 8-)

and im damn proud :twisted:
World - Sulis
Clan - Toxic

H3ROsRogue - lvl 220 rogue
H3ROsRanger - lvl 200 ranger
H3ROsMage - lvl 220 mage
H3ROsDruid - lvl 220 druid
H3ROsWarrior - lvl 200 warrior
H3ROsLocker - lvl 190 rogue

Can't imagine losing kills to a ranger in 2019.

Re: mage dont need to move up the list guys

#17
Well, my mage is going into retirement if they do not get better dps. The only reason I would bring him back is to claok my rogue so he can lvl faster. At the moment my mage has maxed hit 900 and is the highest in my world for mages and my rogue has hit almost twice that high. My mage is also 6 lvls higher than my rogue btw. How is that balanced? If you don't think a mage should at minimum be the second highest dps in the game then i challenge you to play one as your main. You will either give up or change your mind about where mages should be on the dps scale. I just don't think rogues should have that much power when it is so easy to play and lvl.

World: Danu
Remyo lvl 96 Mage
REM lvl 90 Rogue

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests