While many have tried and failed, i myself decided to create a tank ranger
Note: I am a secondary tank with high support (Not a main tank)
I have a shield and spear, rather than a bow. I have all healing skills and bolas.
The heals and bolas are cruecial to the build. Dps is low, but if the main tank dies, staying alive is not a problem. Bolas is ready, along with heals for the tank and me. My stats are full defensive, but the ratio is a secret.
I tested this build by taking on 4-5 level 40's in shale while i was level 34. I am able to solo 3* red wisps at 34, and using stategic tactics, boss soloing is possible.
Why did i do this you may ask... Well i did it just because. I can heal during fights and can be counted on to keep the boss up if others die.
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#2Very interesting I was not aware people bossed at such low levels.
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#3Of coarse people do bosses at low levels... Its called dustwither catacombs lol. What i mean is it can be done, but will take forever.Very interesting I was not aware people bossed at such low levels.
If you look at my signiture, you will notice that im not new lol
SirBlaze333 - 220+ Warrior
(Returning Player)
(Returning Player)
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#4When did I ever said you where new? I never implied any of that. Of course I saw your signature. When I think of bossing I think of actual high level monsters like Rockbelly. I'm sorry you misunderstood my post.
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#5Dont worry about it. You're right though, bossing mobs like rockbelly is not something i'd do with my ranger at the moment. I plan on leveling my ranger on the side, as a last priority or when im bored.When did I ever said you where new? I never implied any of that. Of course I saw your signature. When I think of bossing I think of actual high level monsters like Rockbelly. I'm sorry you misunderstood my post.
SirBlaze333 - 220+ Warrior
(Returning Player)
(Returning Player)
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#6A ranger with health is like a mage with strength. Waste of attribute points.
A ranger is meant to have strength, currently. With all my points in strength i can solo just about any mobs in stonevale with bolas (except fireflight witch uses cloak, quite difficult).
A ranger tanking would make me nervious and confused i think.
A ranger is meant to have strength, currently. With all my points in strength i can solo just about any mobs in stonevale with bolas (except fireflight witch uses cloak, quite difficult).
A ranger tanking would make me nervious and confused i think.
World - Sulis
Clan - Toxic
H3ROsRogue - lvl 220 rogue
H3ROsRanger - lvl 200 ranger
H3ROsMage - lvl 220 mage
H3ROsDruid - lvl 220 druid
H3ROsWarrior - lvl 200 warrior
H3ROsLocker - lvl 190 rogue
Can't imagine losing kills to a ranger in 2019.
Clan - Toxic
H3ROsRogue - lvl 220 rogue
H3ROsRanger - lvl 200 ranger
H3ROsMage - lvl 220 mage
H3ROsDruid - lvl 220 druid
H3ROsWarrior - lvl 200 warrior
H3ROsLocker - lvl 190 rogue
Can't imagine losing kills to a ranger in 2019.
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#7- There is no real credible reason to have a ranger tanking. Any class can tank to a certain degree but why do that when you can have a warrior tank? Assuming of course you actually have one of the warriors that actually built a tank and not some watered down dps version...
Zumuclyst
110
Ranger
Arawn
Serenity
110
Ranger
Arawn
Serenity
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#8I dont want you posting on my threads. You continualy comment without actualy reading what I have typed. Please don't be so ignorant if you are going to continue posting. I dont care about DPS rangers. Im not new to the game, and I am obviously aware of their abilities and role. READ WHAT I TYPED.A ranger with health is like a mage with strength. Waste of attribute points.
A ranger is meant to have strength, currently. With all my points in strength i can solo just about any mobs in stonevale with bolas (except fireflight witch uses cloak, quite difficult).
A ranger tanking would make me nervious and confused i think.
I know...I have a tank-built warrior already. I was going for "First successful ranger support-tank in Rhiannon"- There is no real credible reason to have a ranger tanking. Any class can tank to a certain degree but why do that when you can have a warrior tank? Assuming of course you actually have one of the warriors that actually built a tank and not some watered down dps version...
I have already stated that I am a secondary tank and what I am capable of doing.
SirBlaze333 - 220+ Warrior
(Returning Player)
(Returning Player)
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#9know...I have a tank-built warrior already. I was going for "First successful ranger support-tank in Rhiannon" Good job on that (if you succeeded)
I have already stated that I am a secondary tank and what I am capable of doing.
World: Rhiannon
Clan: RESPECT
My Top Characters:
SirBlaze333 Lvl.86 Warrior -DPS atm
InfernoWizard Lvl.84 Mage -Mage
EmberBlade Lvl.82 Rogue -DPS
what does atm mean just curious
I have already stated that I am a secondary tank and what I am capable of doing.
World: Rhiannon
Clan: RESPECT
My Top Characters:
SirBlaze333 Lvl.86 Warrior -DPS atm
InfernoWizard Lvl.84 Mage -Mage
EmberBlade Lvl.82 Rogue -DPS
what does atm mean just curious
Re: A Twist to Rangers: Tanking
#10"atm" stands for "at the moment".what does atm mean just curious
Another word would be "currently".
SirBlaze333 - 220+ Warrior
(Returning Player)
(Returning Player)