Celtic Heroes

Lol. If you have DL, you should be str build..

Yea?

Lol. If you have DL, you should be str build..

Yea?

Uhh.. Yeah.. the DL provides extra heat damage.

Lol. If you have DL, you should be str build..

Yea?

Uhh.. Yeah.. the DL provides extra heat damage.

Strength doesn't increase heat damage.

Uhh... Str build means literally a damage based build such as having high damage. The heat just helps you hit harder.

Uhh... Str build means literally a damage based build such as having high damage. The heat just helps you hit harder.

So let me see if I understand you correctly.

If you have DL, and since it has heat damage, you should go str build.
If you don't have DL, don't go str build?

Why can't a ranger with DL be dex build?
Why can't a ranger without DL be str build?

I don't play a ranger so I dont have any clue as to why. Please enlighten. Thanks.

Uhh... Str build means literally a damage based build such as having high damage. The heat just helps you hit harder.

So let me see if I understand you correctly.

If you have DL, and since it has heat damage, you should go str build.
If you don't have DL, don't go str build?

Why can't a ranger with DL be dex build?
Why can't a ranger without DL be str build?

I don't play a ranger so I dont have any clue as to why. Please enlighten. Thanks.

I said you "should" not necessarily meaning you "have" to be one.

:3 Hope that clarified things.

Anyone who thinks a ranger can out DPS a rogue is very delusional.

Anyone who thinks a ranger can out DPS a rogue is very delusional.

Lol. Rangers aren't a melee class. Rogues have the best dps..

Anyone who thinks a ranger can out DPS a rogue is very delusional.

Rangers shouldn't be able to out DPS rogues, because rangers are a jack-of-all-trades class while rogues are pretty much DPS. Now mages should be able to out DPS rogues, because they have a lower armor rating than rogues (cloth vs leather). Sadly, OTM nerfed mages because rogues complained. Such a pity.

Anyone who thinks a ranger can out DPS a rogue is very delusional.

Rangers shouldn't be able to out DPS rogues, because rangers are a jack-of-all-trades class while rogues are pretty much DPS. Now mages should be able to out DPS rogues, because they have a lower armor rating than rogues (cloth vs leather). Sadly, OTM nerfed mages because rogues complained. Such a pity.

You're kidding right? What roles can a mage choose? They can be a lure monkey, they can be your energy pool, they can be a full out dps monster AND they can do it all at a distance. What can a rogue do? Dps and uhh dps. That's it not to mention all at a close range ready to be destroyed. So let me ask you what's the point of us being solely a dps class if we aren't even the best?

On topic

No we have plenty of rangers and more than 2x ranger class drops to support them. I personally have 2 urns and an egg and nobody needs them. People will automatically have full dl on my world at level 170 if they fit these 2 conditions: friendly and either a mage/druid/ranger.