Celtic Heroes

This vote doesnt cover those who owe. Once someone has completed offhand they are now at a disadvantage to attain the crowns and payback. This hampers the 'Honor System' we had and I'll be sure to point those whom I owe into your direction. I dont think this rule solves anything and will make the DMs job harder trying to sort out the rolls and who rolled twice or once. I believe theres a sufficient amount of DL weapons already out there with the exception of Rogues. The main DL issue is Rogue weapons not every other class.

Kinda feel anymore it's not whats the greater good for lugh. But what's the greater good for people.

C

I am totally against, if someone has already both mainhand weapon and offand, to get to roll twice!!!
I will only vote after this post can possibly be edited, to get the full weapon dl people, to roll just once. then my vote would be A.
but atm, i refrain from voting.
If a warrior 190+ and he already has a dl weapon and a dl shield, is there a way to clarify in the original post, that he can't roll twice?
maybe that's what you meant, but it wasn't clear and this part could easily be abused.
sorry to repeat twice : )

Sorry elle, I meant that double dicing would not apply to those that already have offhand. I think I said it'd apply to those that need weps or something like that. I dont think anybody would like allowing people who already have offhand to dice twice.

Will update now

tyvm Ade and sorry to bother.
I vote A

C

C

Well it's thursday so the vote is over and it looks like option c wins!

This vote seems way to close to change our current system. I think if i changed my vote and created an account for somebody then A would win.

Most of the time in the u.s. and other countries, it takes a 2/3 majority to change a law. That seems pretty fair for our system too.

Idk we can go w it if you guys want, but it doesn't seem like a decision like this should be decided by fiona and zombie voting c at the end.

Maybe meet in the middle at 187 or 188?

And this messes up the owing system, which hasn't been discussed.

So please pick one of the options and we will plan on enforcing this system at noon EST on Thursday, March 20th, based on the majority vote.

C was leading before their votes, and what you're basically saying is that their votes don't matter.

If people wanted 188 they'd have voted B but notice how there are 0 votes for that option?

Majority rules as you stated in the OP quoted above. Don't try and propose a rule next time if you'll want to discard it simply because the outcome is not what you had truly hoped for.

Well, technically, noon isn't here yet, so voting shouldn't be closed just yet.

BUT, I agree with Vulture (gasp!) that you can't change the plan just because you don't like the outcome. That isn't how democracy works.