Celtic Heroes

Ok. Let's bring up the seals. In a quick description, were at the 5th one, with the fall of Babylon the Great. Babylon was New York, and 9/11. I don't have the description for Babylon right now.

I know that Babylon was riding on The Beast, which is America, again no description from the Bible atm. There's an Ocean surrounding them, and in the Bible they are described as many people from many places (or something similar). Is it not true that America is consider the melting pot because of all the ethnicities immigrating to America.

Finally, on to the rest of the seals. Over time more disease and more war has broken out. In the Bible, the seals breaking unleashes more war, and more famine, and more disease.

It takes a feverishly religious zealot to see each new intermediate fossil as doubling the gaps in knowledge.

Sorry i don't understand what you're trying to get at here.

It takes highly specialized circumstances to actually fossilize a dead animal. It's extremely rare and on top of that they can be worn away with time. It's amazing we have the detailed records we have. But people who are religious and can't face facts see every single new fossil as now having more gaps in the record. So if you had one particular dinosaur and a related species there is a gap there. Finding a common ancestor to both doubles that gap to two gaps since now you need to find the fossils that transition into those original two. It's just insanely stupid.

No only religious people who practice reality denial think that. There is zero scientific debate. We have genetic DNA evidence, fossils (not faked lol you can see them yourself if you go to the right museums), archaeological and geological evidence.

If there is no scientific debate, why did Bill Nye and Ken Ham have a creation/evolution debate not 3 months ago? Evidently someone thought there was enough reason to have a debate. What transitional species are there? Please tell me

Like varlen said it was not a scientific debate. Bill nye said evidence would change his mind. Hammy said nothing would. Nye presented evidence that bored the crowd. Hammy only presented anectdotal stories from people to support his crackpot theories that even creationists don't believe. I mean there are trees older than hammy claims the world is you can count the rings. There was no scientific debate at all.

FFS you can swab your cheek and see what % your DNA is shared with Neanderthals since they interbred with humans. There were many genetic advantages passed on such as processing fats better.

We share 50% percent DNA with bananas, but we don't act 50% like bananas.

having a % of the genes match when you start matching from anywhere does not make for any evidence of behaving similarly. Also cite your source since it seems to come from a scifi writer who made up the claim I was able to find 25% as a source. Additionally if you look at the details of the genes, what they do for cellular functions and such, you can see that humans and bananas are related. It is just further back on the evolutionary tree.

All life - dogs, cats, trees (even bananas), fungus, bacteria, viruses, fish, birds - everything has a common ancestor.

Ok. Let's bring up the seals. In a quick description, were at the 5th one, with the fall of Babylon the Great. Babylon was New York, and 9/11. I don't have the description for Babylon right now.

I know that Babylon was riding on The Beast, which is America, again no description from the Bible atm. There's an Ocean surrounding them, and in the Bible they are described as many people from many places (or something similar). Is it not true that America is consider the melting pot because of all the ethnicities immigrating to America.

Finally, on to the rest of the seals. Over time more disease and more war has broken out. In the Bible, the seals breaking unleashes more war, and more famine, and more disease.

Yes totally. Though I think Sam and dean were able to finally close the gate and banish satan back to hell. At least im pretty sure i missed most of season 3.

I've no idea what your referencing, but anyone with eyes can see I'm talking about Revelations.

Ok. Let's bring up the seals. In a quick description, were at the 5th one, with the fall of Babylon the Great. Babylon was New York, and 9/11. I don't have the description for Babylon right now.

I know that Babylon was riding on The Beast, which is America, again no description from the Bible atm. There's an Ocean surrounding them, and in the Bible they are described as many people from many places (or something similar). Is it not true that America is consider the melting pot because of all the ethnicities immigrating to America.

Finally, on to the rest of the seals. Over time more disease and more war has broken out. In the Bible, the seals breaking unleashes more war, and more famine, and more disease.

What justification do you have to match all of these names and events with the modern world?

Ok. Let's bring up the seals. In a quick description, were at the 5th one, with the fall of Babylon the Great. Babylon was New York, and 9/11. I don't have the description for Babylon right now.

I know that Babylon was riding on The Beast, which is America, again no description from the Bible atm. There's an Ocean surrounding them, and in the Bible they are described as many people from many places (or something similar). Is it not true that America is consider the melting pot because of all the ethnicities immigrating to America.

Finally, on to the rest of the seals. Over time more disease and more war has broken out. In the Bible, the seals breaking unleashes more war, and more famine, and more disease.

We are at a low for war atm, and this does not prove creationism.

Ok just to clarify, just because one small part of the bible is right doesnt mean the whole thing is. There was once a man named Walter white who dealt drugs, does that make the entirety of breaking bad a 100% true story? No it doesn't, the bible can have every fact it wants right, but if it doesn't have creationism evidence, then it is wrong p

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2014/01/2 ... noahs-ark/

Informative story about how a 4000 year old tablet has the flood myth in it with many of the same details. Also how the bible is not consistent with its own flood story.

Genesis is obviously a mix and recompilation of earlier myths. What today we would call plagiarism.

Common people bring on the denial! It's fun to read!

Ok just to clarify, just because one small part of the bible is right doesnt mean the whole thing is. There was once a man named Walter white who dealt drugs, does that make the entirety of breaking bad a 100% true story? No it doesn't, the bible can have every fact it wants right, but if it doesn't have creationism evidence, then it is wrong p

You might add that just about every claim that can be shown false has been shown false.

Why in genesis alone 99% Of the verifiable information is easily shown false.

Ok just to clarify, just because one small part of the bible is right doesnt mean the whole thing is. There was once a man named Walter white who dealt drugs, does that make the entirety of breaking bad a 100% true story? No it doesn't, the bible can have every fact it wants right, but if it doesn't have creationism evidence, then it is wrong p

You might add that just about every claim that can be shown false has been shown false.

Why in genesis alone 99% Of the verifiable information is easily shown false.

Without using evolution? No? Thats what I thought.

The point with the flood tablet is that almost every major religion has some record of a worldwide flood. So maybe its true?