Celtic Heroes

Btw god is also sexist, seems god only likes the white male, just as society did at that time (more proof christianity is a hoax) and yes, it is in the new testament, Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a women to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet"

Um, were does the Bible discriminate against blacks? Also that verse was referring to the church. God made women as a companion for man. The man was to be the head of the family. As God was the one who created women, it was His responsibility to determine what the purpose of women was.

I just love the misogyny in the bible.

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bib ... the-Woman/

Take a look it's awesome. Do you let women speak in your church? If you do you are going to hell lol. The bible really puts them in thier subservient place. Good job christianity.

Btw god is also sexist, seems god only likes the white male, just as society did at that time (more proof christianity is a hoax) and yes, it is in the new testament, Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a women to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet"

Um, were does the Bible discriminate against blacks? Also that verse was referring to the church. God made women as a companion for man. The man was to be the head of the family. As God was the one who created women, it was His responsibility to determine what the purpose of women was.

I just love the misogyny in the bible.

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bib ... the-Woman/

Take a look it's awesome. Do you let women speak in your church? If you do you are going to hell lol. The bible really puts them in thier subservient place. Good job christianity.

Actually I worded my response wrong. Women are not to be pastors in the church(or deacons; or elders). It's funny, because it seems like you didn't read all those verses. Women are not "beneath" men; their purpose is just different. We are all human.

Btw god is also sexist, seems god only likes the white male, just as society did at that time (more proof christianity is a hoax) and yes, it is in the new testament, Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a women to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet"

Um, were does the Bible discriminate against blacks? Also that verse was referring to the church. God made women as a companion for man. The man was to be the head of the family. As God was the one who created women, it was His responsibility to determine what the purpose of women was.

Just as the dog is made to be the companion for man? I think if you were female you would think differently, you should rot in jail for such scrutiny of your own race. Also, I never said the bible was against blacks, jesus himself was black ( although if you were to show a picture of jesus to a christian quite a few would throw racial slurs) I merely pointed out that males were the dominant at the time, so it had to be jesus as a male, and another thing, if god has no gender, why is jesus male? Shouldnt jesus be a transexual?

If you believe we all have a purpose, and god made us to serve that purpose, then god made me atheist, and god made Muslims Muslim, etc. ergo, god condemns billions to hell just cos he is bored, what a nice fella.

Um, were does the Bible discriminate against blacks? Also that verse was referring to the church. God made women as a companion for man. The man was to be the head of the family. As God was the one who created women, it was His responsibility to determine what the purpose of women was.

I just love the misogyny in the bible.

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bib ... the-Woman/

Take a look it's awesome. Do you let women speak in your church? If you do you are going to hell lol. The bible really puts them in thier subservient place. Good job christianity.

Actually I worded my response wrong. Women are not to be pastors in the church(or deacons; or elders). It's funny, because it seems like you didn't read all those verses. Women are not "beneath" men; their purpose is just different. We are all human.

Women are not beneath men?? Lmao are you fkn me here for real???!?!?!?

Do you even read the bible lololol!!! They are to shut up and not speak. They are to obey thier husbands no matter what while the man has nothing to answer to. They are prohibited from teaching. It says they are contentious. They are the cause of all sin and the fall of mankind. They are to learn in silence. They are to bear children and know thier place.

Yes outside of the textbook definition of being sexist/misogynistic then yes it's not sexist or misogynistic. Lmao.

Keep going!!

Btw god is also sexist, seems god only likes the white male, just as society did at that time (more proof christianity is a hoax) and yes, it is in the new testament, Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a women to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet"

Um, were does the Bible discriminate against blacks? Also that verse was referring to the church. God made women as a companion for man. The man was to be the head of the family. As God was the one who created women, it was His responsibility to determine what the purpose of women was.

Just as the dog is made to be the companion for man? I think if you were female you would think differently, you should rot in jail for such scrutiny of your own race. Also, I never said the bible was against blacks, jesus himself was black ( although if you were to show a picture of jesus to a christian quite a few would throw racial slurs) I merely pointed out that males were the dominant at the time, so it had to be jesus as a male, and another thing, if god has no gender, why is jesus male? Shouldnt jesus be a transexual?

I literally facepalmed at this. How can you even begin to compare the relationship between dog and man, and man and woman? God created woman to be man's companion. He created dogs for the human-kinds enjoyment yes. But women He created to be so much more. This has to be one of the dumbest things I've seen in a few minutes(lol). Also, God said that women was to be man's companion while He did not say that dogs were to be mans companion(that adage or maxim came later, and it wasn't even in the Bible).

What do you not understand about the fact that Jesus came down to earth as a human? There were not very many natural transsexual people in the world back then if you hadn't noticed.

Shouldnt jesus be a transexual?

Priceless.


If we are made in gods image then god obviously has both manly and lady parts.

Um, were does the Bible discriminate against blacks? Also that verse was referring to the church. God made women as a companion for man. The man was to be the head of the family. As God was the one who created women, it was His responsibility to determine what the purpose of women was.

Just as the dog is made to be the companion for man? I think if you were female you would think differently, you should rot in jail for such scrutiny of your own race. Also, I never said the bible was against blacks, jesus himself was black ( although if you were to show a picture of jesus to a christian quite a few would throw racial slurs) I merely pointed out that males were the dominant at the time, so it had to be jesus as a male, and another thing, if god has no gender, why is jesus male? Shouldnt jesus be a transexual?

I literally facepalmed at this. How can you even begin to compare the relationship between dog and man, and man and woman? God created woman to be man's companion. He created dogs for the human-kinds enjoyment yes. But women He created to be so much more. This has to be one of the dumbest things I've seen in a few minutes(lol). Also, God said that women was to be man's companion while He did not say that dogs were to be mans companion(that adage or maxim came later, and it wasn't even in the Bible).

What do you not understand about the fact that Jesus came down to earth as a human? There were not very many natural transsexual people in the world back then if you hadn't noticed.

Yes of course there weren't many transgender people. They were an abomination of god and murdered on the spot.

Just like there are no gay people in iran. I think they just murdered the last one to open up.

Plus3 said

Um, were does the Bible discriminate against blacks? Also that verse was referring to the church. God made women as a companion for man. The man was to be the head of the family. As God was the one who created women, it was His responsibility to determine what the purpose of women was.

I just love the misogyny in the bible.

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bib ... the-Woman/

Take a look it's awesome. Do you let women speak in your church? If you do you are going to hell lol. The bible really puts them in thier subservient place. Good job christianity.

Actually I worded my response wrong. Women are not to be pastors in the church(or deacons; or elders). It's funny, because it seems like you didn't read all those verses. Women are not "beneath" men; their purpose is just different. We are all human.

Women are not beneath men?? Lmao are you fkn me here for real???!?!?!?

Do you even read the bible lololol!!! They are to shut up and not speak. They are to obey thier husbands no matter what while the man has nothing to answer to. They are prohibited from teaching. It says they are contentious. They are the cause of all sin and the fall of mankind. They are to learn in silence. They are to bear children and know thier place.

Yes outside of the textbook definition of being sexist/misogynistic then yes it's not sexist or misogynistic. Lmao.

Keep going!![/quote]

I might have read the Bible more than you have seen one. They are to obey their husbands(as long as the husbands do not tell them to do something that is against the word of God). They are not to teach in church; that is also true, for reasons you would not understand. They are prohibited from being the pastor/elders/deacons of a church. The man has nothing to answer to? How about God? Duh. Eve was deceived by Satan, Adam knowingly partook of the fruit. Which is the worse sin there? Are they to bear children? Uh, yeah. They are the female kind, are they not? If you haven't noticed, men kinda can't bear children. Some women are contentious; some are not.

Do both men and women have different jobs/responsibilities/purposes? Yes.

Plus3 said:

Um, were does the Bible discriminate against blacks? Also that verse was referring to the church. God made women as a companion for man. The man was to be the head of the family. As God was the one who created women, it was His responsibility to determine what the purpose of women was.

Just as the dog is made to be the companion for man? I think if you were female you would think differently, you should rot in jail for such scrutiny of your own race. Also, I never said the bible was against blacks, jesus himself was black ( although if you were to show a picture of jesus to a christian quite a few would throw racial slurs) I merely pointed out that males were the dominant at the time, so it had to be jesus as a male, and another thing, if god has no gender, why is jesus male? Shouldnt jesus be a transexual?

I literally facepalmed at this. How can you even begin to compare the relationship between dog and man, and man and woman? God created woman to be man's companion. He created dogs for the human-kinds enjoyment yes. But women He created to be so much more. This has to be one of the dumbest things I've seen in a few minutes(lol). Also, God said that women was to be man's companion while He did not say that dogs were to be mans companion(that adage or maxim came later, and it wasn't even in the Bible).

What do you not understand about the fact that Jesus came down to earth as a human? There were not very many natural transsexual people in the world back then if you hadn't noticed.

Yes of course there weren't many transgender people. They were an abomination of god and murdered on the spot.

Just like there are no gay people in iran. I think they just murdered the last one to open up.[/quote]

There still aren't many transgender people compared to everyone else. Do you know what they used for mirrors back then? It wasn't exactly polished glass. So though we are in His image, it doesn't mean we are exactly like Him. Plus, we were corrupted by sin.