Your entire argument is a fail because women weren't (and still aren't in many ways) paid the same for the same work done. So by production (not hourly) which shouldn't matter to the business owner - yet they were still paid a lot less or denied employment. It's mostly about discrimination and keeping them subservient rather than some actual argument about strength.If a women was raped a 100 years ago that was at least a big of a deal as it is now. They couldn't vote that is true. Of course that changed by 50 years ago. I believe it was at about WWII that things began improving as people realized that women could do many things just as well as men. Very long ago the reason that you pretty much had to marry was the fact that many things took very great physical strength and stamina. Of course some women had the necessary qualities to plow, etc. but we might as well face it: in the physical department, the average man trumps the average women. This in no way makes the man better; its just a fact of life. And back then, strength was needed. As brains started to matter more and more until they were about equal, women were able to depend on themselves more and more. Show me the law that said that women could not own property. Most men, even rough men that would shoot a man for snoring, wouldnt even think of swearing around a woman or a child. It was commen practice to hold the door open for a women or help them in any way possible. It is not like that now. Insults on my historical knowledge will get you no where.U think women were treated with more respect 100 Years ago than now? Let me put it this way, if a women were raped 100 years ago the women would be blamed, they couldn't own property, they couldn't vote so they couldn't change, it was either marry, or die. Your knowledge of history is pathetic.
Women were not allowed to own property in the USA. http://nationalparalegal.edu/public_doc ... sWomen.asp
In fact women did not get the same rights to own property as men until about 60 years ago.
It varied by state. Usually they got the right to manage thier spouses property in the intrem if he was incapacitated first. That is not ownership rights. The Bible Belt states were the worst offenders of women's rights often using the bible as justification. I suggest you look it up yourself. No real need to insult you on your history knowledge you have done a fine job yourself.