Celtic Heroes

The Official Forum for Celtic Heroes, the 3D MMORPG for iOS and Android Devices

Re: ''Rule''

#21
The rules that we currently follow don't have to remain the same, they can evolve based on what we think is fair. In any case, there have been no "new" rules.
Lock on start is New. Mordris has been the ONLY exception due to the strategy involved. Your dead wrong on this as we JUST had Ade run in and declare that the 5* doesnt require lock on start. That was New to almost everyone except the 2 alliance players who were late. Late based on a rule I saw you declare. Lugh will decide on what is fair and your clan needs to figure out why it thinks it can show up at bosses with the authority to make declarations.

Re: ''Rule''

#22
The rules that we currently follow don't have to remain the same, they can evolve based on what we think is fair. In any case, there have been no "new" rules.
Lock on start is New. Mordris has been the ONLY exception due to the strategy involved. Your dead wrong on this as we JUST had Ade run in and declare that the 5* doesnt require lock on start. That was New to almost everyone except the 2 alliance players who were late. Late based on a rule I saw you declare. Lugh will decide on what is fair and your clan needs to figure out why it thinks it can show up at bosses with the authority to make declarations.
+1 8-)

Re: ''Rule''

#23
The rules that we currently follow don't have to remain the same, they can evolve based on what we think is fair. In any case, there have been no "new" rules.
Lock on start is New. Mordris has been the ONLY exception due to the strategy involved. Your dead wrong on this as we JUST had Ade run in and declare that the 5* doesnt require lock on start. That was New to almost everyone except the 2 alliance players who were late. Late based on a rule I saw you declare. Lugh will decide on what is fair and your clan needs to figure out why it thinks it can show up at bosses with the authority to make declarations.
+1 8-)
+1

better together

gingerkhan
OTM: 6s+ running iOS 10.3

gingerkhan (warrior) 200+ .. agent99 (rogue) 200+
ancient member of craven .. current member of ancients

Re: ''Rule''

#24
Boss can take 20+ minutes to lock. 5* takes seconds. No need to enforce lock at start of 5*. It just creates confusion.

And quit singling out my clan for this. Everybody agreed to a lock at start for 200 boss after one of the first fights. It was unanimous..

Try to be logical here people. Lock at start for boss makes complete sense.

Re: ''Rule''

#26
Ginger, you personally said out loud in area chat at the 200 6* that it should lock at start. Calla, you have "locked" every 200 6* besides one. Vir, you weren't there so couldn't know. This is rediculous..

Re: ''Rule''

#28
+1 Angus.. Should have been more discussion after the first fight and, if that had included discussion here in forums, we would have had more ideas weighed. Most seemed to like lock at start initially, because it would be better than lock at lock -- maybe 20 minutes into the fight... As we have discussed more options together I have heard some good ideas. Thor is recent post suggested 10-15%. I tried to make that objectively measurable with a possible 3 minute rule. A subsequent player modified this further by suggesting that a designated dm call when the 3 minute mark had occurred. This process or perfecting a new rule should have occurred earlier, and I am glad it is happening now.

To be clear, there remain multiple new rule concepts worthy of discussion and perfection. One may become used for this event and others may become quite useful in future events or in the update.

I hope that we are all we interested as Angus to be deliberating and perfecting together. Better late than never

As always, better together +1 angus and +1 to this discussion

gingie
OTM: 6s+ running iOS 10.3

gingerkhan (warrior) 200+ .. agent99 (rogue) 200+
ancient member of craven .. current member of ancients

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests