I think he makes sense, and you putting him down like that is rude and i feel like you are trying to get attention for that. Warriors have heavy armor now don't they? Heavy armor generally comes with consequences. I watch a lot of movies and shows based around this time and they often claim that armor makes them slow. And what does that leave? Leaves the other classes like ranger and rogue with light armor to have quicker attacks. Hence the idea where warriors are slow and rogues/rangers are fast. As for druids and mages very light armour but very powerful spells. They need the light armor because along with speed movement, heavy armor also brings your energy down. I know speed movement nerfs would not be very fair in game, but if this were taken into a real life perspective, you can understand why this belief is not ''silly'' and why other people believe the same thing.Nah warriors are not suppose to be slow, does not make sense lore wise or balance wise to simply make a statement with no reasoning behind it means nothing. Rogues are not suppose to be fast they are suppose to be sneaky and warriors are suppose to be fast and in your face. How many times do you see a slow mo warrior on a frenzy you don't bc it makes no sense. To simply say that warriors are suppose to be slow bc you are just repeating what you see other people post is silly.+1, but -1 for " warrior are op ". Rogues and ranger do damn good lixes, we do much more lesser, remember warriors are slow-1, as warriors are now, we already get too much complaints about being "OP", and i havent seen many ppl who know the true issues of a warrior, adding that to frenzy, adding highest attack bonus, highest dmg bonus, and now will add speed bonus, that would be insane, haste would also be much more suitable.
As or rogues not being fast, but being sneaky. Look for some rogue movies online or something and tell me if you find a slow rogue id like to know.
