Most of otm explanation for why account sharing is bannable seemed to be based off of possible scamming issues that can arrise. It makes absolutely no sense that clan banks are allowed to be shared and accounts are not. The risk of loosing important items is way higher with a clan bank than with a lvl 50 toon with some lux lol.
I'd love an explenation on that lil brain buster.
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#22Most of otm explanation for why account sharing is bannable seemed to be based off of possible scamming issues that can arrise. It makes absolutely no sense that clan banks are allowed to be shared and accounts are not. The risk of loosing important items is way higher with a clan bank than with a lvl 50 toon with some lux lol.
I'd love an explenation on that lil brain buster.
Which has already happend on Arawn once but let's not get off topic
The true point of the thread is to try and understand why these people werent banned when one of them openly admitted on forums another of his clanmates backed up account sharing in a youtube video. ( which he now made private to try and hide his manipulation)
The other point in this thread is to get an explanation on why otm employees are talking to ch players about details of warnings and bans and having conversations. This imo is way over the line .
Nueee lvl 222 Ranger
Arawn
Selfie lvl 125+ rogue ( Retired)
Lugh
Best rapper in the ch community
http://www.soundcloud.com
Search Nue Sizemore
Arawn
Selfie lvl 125+ rogue ( Retired)
Lugh
Best rapper in the ch community
http://www.soundcloud.com
Search Nue Sizemore
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#23The real reason is OTM probably dosent mind account sharing. But to publicly post it in their TOS makes it a open and shut case for apple to ban OTM from iTunes, even so far as to remote wipe ch from all apple devices and sue OTM. Into non-existence.Most of otm explanation for why account sharing is bannable seemed to be based off of possible scamming issues that can arrise. It makes absolutely no sense that clan banks are allowed to be shared and accounts are not. The risk of loosing important items is way higher with a clan bank than with a lvl 50 toon with some lux lol.
I'd love an explenation on that lil brain buster.
OTM cannot even confirm or deny this without opening themselves to lawsuit. Thus all shared accounts will be banned is in the TOS but OTM says secretly clan banks are ok and dosent crack down on most sharing. They dare not ban clan banks - which by the way HAS HAPPENED more than once. It causes massive backlash and rage quitting which hurts OTMs bottom line.
Really they could avoid this double stNdard by fixing the clan item storage system and then enforcing the TOS as written.
Member of Aeon - Taranis - 24 boxer
220+ toons
Ravenleaf druid - Silverstring ranger
Stormsong warrior - Nwerb Mage - Eventide Rogue
Toon histogram:
Level_____|200+|150-199|100-149|50-99|20-49|1-19|
# of toons|_5__|___16___|____3___|__11__|__21_|407|
220+ toons
Ravenleaf druid - Silverstring ranger
Stormsong warrior - Nwerb Mage - Eventide Rogue
Toon histogram:
Level_____|200+|150-199|100-149|50-99|20-49|1-19|
# of toons|_5__|___16___|____3___|__11__|__21_|407|
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#24The real reason is OTM probably dosent mind account sharing. But to publicly post it in their TOS makes it a open and shut case for apple to ban OTM from iTunes, even so far as to remote wipe ch from all apple devices and sue OTM. Into non-existence.Most of otm explanation for why account sharing is bannable seemed to be based off of possible scamming issues that can arrise. It makes absolutely no sense that clan banks are allowed to be shared and accounts are not. The risk of loosing important items is way higher with a clan bank than with a lvl 50 toon with some lux lol.
I'd love an explenation on that lil brain buster.
OTM cannot even confirm or deny this without opening themselves to lawsuit. Thus all shared accounts will be banned is in the TOS but OTM says secretly clan banks are ok and dosent crack down on most sharing. They dare not ban clan banks - which by the way HAS HAPPENED more than once. It causes massive backlash and rage quitting which hurts OTMs bottom line.
Really they could avoid this double stNdard by fixing the clan item storage system and then enforcing the TOS as written.
So if i pay a lot of money and beef up their bottom line i can break the rules ? No the same rules should apply ... Again this is not about the banks in any way shape or form this is two players who have broken the rules and only got a warning when they should have been banned just like everyone else . It's about otm not following thier own rules.
Nueee lvl 222 Ranger
Arawn
Selfie lvl 125+ rogue ( Retired)
Lugh
Best rapper in the ch community
http://www.soundcloud.com
Search Nue Sizemore
Arawn
Selfie lvl 125+ rogue ( Retired)
Lugh
Best rapper in the ch community
http://www.soundcloud.com
Search Nue Sizemore
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#25Try harder to get many members of my clan members including me banned. Looks like that is the only way your favourite clan can get dl and event bosses.
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#26Try harder to get many members of my clan members including me banned. Looks like that is the only way your favourite clan can get dl and event bosses.
This has nothing to do with event bossea or DL only otms rules . In which the people i speak of have broken.and weren't punished accordingly like the rest of us . Instead only get a warning.
Last edited by nueee on Sun Oct 12, 2014 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nueee lvl 222 Ranger
Arawn
Selfie lvl 125+ rogue ( Retired)
Lugh
Best rapper in the ch community
http://www.soundcloud.com
Search Nue Sizemore
Arawn
Selfie lvl 125+ rogue ( Retired)
Lugh
Best rapper in the ch community
http://www.soundcloud.com
Search Nue Sizemore
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#27The real reason is OTM probably dosent mind account sharing. But to publicly post it in their TOS makes it a open and shut case for apple to ban OTM from iTunes, even so far as to remote wipe ch from all apple devices and sue OTM. Into non-existence.Most of otm explanation for why account sharing is bannable seemed to be based off of possible scamming issues that can arrise. It makes absolutely no sense that clan banks are allowed to be shared and accounts are not. The risk of loosing important items is way higher with a clan bank than with a lvl 50 toon with some lux lol.
I'd love an explenation on that lil brain buster.
OTM cannot even confirm or deny this without opening themselves to lawsuit. Thus all shared accounts will be banned is in the TOS but OTM says secretly clan banks are ok and dosent crack down on most sharing. They dare not ban clan banks - which by the way HAS HAPPENED more than once. It causes massive backlash and rage quitting which hurts OTMs bottom line.
Really they could avoid this double stNdard by fixing the clan item storage system and then enforcing the TOS as written.
So if i pay a lot of money and beef up their bottom line i can break the rules ? No the same rules should apply ... Again this is not about the banks in any way shape or form this is two players who have broken the rules and only got a warning when they should have been banned just like everyone else . It's about otm not following thier own rules.
This post is potentially defamatory of the business ethics of OTM and totally without basis. This person should be permanently banned from the forum for starting trouble again and again.
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#28Try harder to get many members of my clan members including me banned. Looks like that is the only way your favourite clan can get dl and event bosses.
This has nothing to do with event bossea or DL only otms rules . In which the people i speak of have broken.
My only question is, who are you to act as the "police" and why does it matter to you so dearly
pigman, with the fury of the pigs and the mind of a man
level 210+ rogue
Morrigan
Avalon
put your pants on, we're going out
level 210+ rogue
Morrigan
Avalon
put your pants on, we're going out
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#29Otm please check back all the posts this person has started to cause trouble. You will see he is a pathological trouble maker and must be banned permanently to foster harmony in the forum.
Re: Yes or no( rulebreakers / bombshells)
#30Otm please check back all the posts this person has started to cause trouble. You will see he is a pathological trouble maker and must be banned permanently to foster harmony in the forum.
Check back everyone feel free too . It's not im a troublemaker its that i bring the truth right up front and im blanantly open about it and you guys hate it do these tactics in order to try and get threads locked . Your stretching seriously lol
@ pig man im not the police but this is complete bs . If there's rules they should apply to everyone. And otm shouldn't be giving information to ch players on detials of bans and warnings.
Nueee lvl 222 Ranger
Arawn
Selfie lvl 125+ rogue ( Retired)
Lugh
Best rapper in the ch community
http://www.soundcloud.com
Search Nue Sizemore
Arawn
Selfie lvl 125+ rogue ( Retired)
Lugh
Best rapper in the ch community
http://www.soundcloud.com
Search Nue Sizemore