Celtic Heroes

Just because the Hawks beat the Broncos last year doesn't mean they will beat the pats. Patriots are way better than the Broncos and Tom Brady is arguably better than manning. Patriots are pretty well rounded and the Seahawks defense is incredible. It'll be a good game but don't underestimate the underdog.

Pats > Broncos? I couldn't say that lol. Peyton statistically is better than Tom. Pats are everything but the underdogs lol they make the playoffs just about every year for a while now. statistically I couldn't say pats have better defense than the broncos. Nor offense. But, patriots do play well vs the broncos. It's a team going to the Superbowl back to back times vs the last team Who's actually done that.
Defense is what patriots will need. Alot of it. Their D-line must be strong or Lynch will have a 150+ yard game with 2-3 rushing td's. Along with Russell having roughly 50 rushing yards and 230+ yard passes maybe an int with a td or 2. Mark my words lol. If pats win it will be the Seahawks' offense fault. Maybe a bit of defensive slip ups too.

Pats no question. Im a die heart patriot fan and nobody will convice me otherwise

Just because the Hawks beat the Broncos last year doesn't mean they will beat the pats. Patriots are way better than the Broncos and Tom Brady is arguably better than manning. Patriots are pretty well rounded and the Seahawks defense is incredible. It'll be a good game but don't underestimate the underdog.

Pats > Broncos? I couldn't say that lol. Peyton statistically is better than Tom. Pats are everything but the underdogs lol they make the playoffs just about every year for a while now. statistically I couldn't say pats have better defense than the broncos. Nor offense. But, patriots do play well vs the broncos. It's a team going to the Superbowl back to back times vs the last team Who's actually done that.
Defense is what patriots will need. Alot of it. Their D-line must be strong or Lynch will have a 150+ yard game with 2-3 rushing td's. Along with Russell having roughly 50 rushing yards and 230+ yard passes maybe an int with a td or 2. Mark my words lol. If pats win it will be the Seahawks' offense fault. Maybe a bit of defensive slip ups too.

Funny stuff, im just curious, how many super bowls has Peyton been in? How many has brady been in? Enough said..... The best quarterbacks and those that stand out are the ones who want to win the most. If brady had the weapons manning has now, pats will score 40+ a game. Brady doesnt get equiped with superior weapons, he makes them. Who has manning made? I suppose reggie wayne, who else? Brady made Gronk a strong player, edelman, welker, moss, Aaron hernandez (lol), he even throws a td pass to nate soldier in the AFC championship who is an offensive tackle lol (tight end first year). He will do anything to win. Thats how you consider all time greats. Stats throwing the ball and if they win. Simple. Pats RULE #PATRIOTSFORTHEWIN #SUPERBOWL2015CHAMPS

Seahawks. Pats only chance is Gronk who will be covered on every play by Kami Chanceler or Earl Thomas. Seahawks corners vs. Patriot receivers... Seahawks can also stop the run with bobby Wagner and can force bad passes with Michael Bennit and Cliff Avril pass rushing. Patriots also cant stop the Beast. Revis can stop Keats's but Willson will dominate. Result- Seahawks.

Thats funny...just Gronk...what about Edelman and Lafell? And just Revis? Brandon Browner and Kyle Arrington will shut down any receiver opposite of Revis and the Pats can stop the run between Vince Wilfork and Jamie Collins not to mention Dont'a Hightower and Jerod Mayo...

Come on man, forgetting wilfork and devin mccurty. Superior defense right there, arguable better secondary than Seattle

Only people saying the Seahawks will win came up with a good argument

3rd post in a row maybe? or 4? Anyways ill give reasons why the pats will win First off when you have two solid defenses then of course wouldnt the better offensive win? I hate how everybody says Seattle is best defense (although they might be) but why are the pats defense out of the equation? Seattle wont be able to pass against the pats. What if they are in a hole and start off losing? then they need to pass. Wilson has douq baldwin as his best option which doesnt say much. Revis will be 1-1 with him. After you eliminate the best option not a whole lot he could do. Of course the pats will expect the rush, but having revis staying 1 on 1 with baldwin takes away him. BrandonBrowner (former seahawk) is another strong corner, why forget about him? Marshawn Lynch is a power back. He plows through people UP THE MIDDLE. With big Wilfork in the middle, no way hes getting through him. Also, Wilson had 5 turnovers alone last week against a not so good defense. (4 pics and fum). Now a young qb like himself, wouldnt you think he throw at least 1 probably 2 against the pats defense? If this happens, the defense cannot help it if the pats start the ball past the 50. Thats great field position. Even the best defense cannot stop teams who get the ball past the 50 on a everyday consistent basis. Also with these turnovers the seattle defense will be on the field for the majority of the game causing them to be tired by the end. All the pats have to do is force a couple turnovers, jump a td early, and stay on the field. With great field position, the defense being tired and having a lead, the defense is limited and the seattle offense therefore has to throw the ball. What happens when he throws the ball? Another not as experienced qb in a lifetime game, nervous as hell, making mistakes. Its life it happens. Keeping seattles defense on the field will tire them out and will cause them to not be as good. Try to refute me on that because its common knowledge, when you are tired, you dont perform the best you can

lol @ Brady having no weapons. Did you really just use superbowls as a best qb comparison? It's not just a quarterback who takes a team to a Superbowl. It's every asset of the team that helps them climb their way to the Superbowl. Brady and Peyton are both great qbs. Peyton hasn't always had a great team either. He just went to the broncos a few years back, not saying He was bad with the colts but definitely not as good of a team that He has now. Brady has always been with New England and has always had a good team.
If Brady can come out with a W. I have mad props for him. But it would have to be off of the way the Seahawks are playing and if they are making mistakes or not.

Deflatriots.

Brady hasnt always had a great recieving core either...

Only people saying the Seahawks will win came up with a good argument

3rd post in a row maybe? or 4? Anyways ill give reasons why the pats will win First off when you have two solid defenses then of course wouldnt the better offensive win? I hate how everybody says Seattle is best defense (although they might be) but why are the pats defense out of the equation? Seattle wont be able to pass against the pats. What if they are in a hole and start off losing? then they need to pass. Wilson has douq baldwin as his best option which doesnt say much. Revis will be 1-1 with him. After you eliminate the best option not a whole lot he could do. Of course the pats will expect the rush, but having revis staying 1 on 1 with baldwin takes away him. BrandonBrowner (former seahawk) is another strong corner, why forget about him? Marshawn Lynch is a power back. He plows through people UP THE MIDDLE. With big Wilfork in the middle, no way hes getting through him. Also, Wilson had 5 turnovers alone last week against a not so good defense. (4 pics and fum). Now a young qb like himself, wouldnt you think he throw at least 1 probably 2 against the pats defense? If this happens, the defense cannot help it if the pats start the ball past the 50. Thats great field position. Even the best defense cannot stop teams who get the ball past the 50 on a everyday consistent basis. Also with these turnovers the seattle defense will be on the field for the majority of the game causing them to be tired by the end. All the pats have to do is force a couple turnovers, jump a td early, and stay on the field. With great field position, the defense being tired and having a lead, the defense is limited and the seattle offense therefore has to throw the ball. What happens when he throws the ball? Another not as experienced qb in a lifetime game, nervous as hell, making mistakes. Its life it happens. Keeping seattles defense on the field will tire them out and will cause them to not be as good. Try to refute me on that because its common knowledge, when you are tired, you dont perform the best you can

The Seahawks have a secondary that can intercept any of the patriots passes. No matter how good tom Brady is you can't compare endleman to Sherman... or Earl Thomas... or Kam... or Maxwell... also even if Revis takes Baldwin Kearse will be open and if Browner covering him then willson will be open. And Lynch can just run a power sweep and outrun any of the Patriots D-Line and Linebacker unit.

lol @ Brady having no weapons. Did you really just use superbowls as a best qb comparison? It's not just a quarterback who takes a team to a Superbowl. It's every asset of the team that helps them climb their way to the Superbowl. Brady and Peyton are both great qbs. Peyton hasn't always had a great team either. He just went to the broncos a few years back, not saying He was bad with the colts but definitely not as good of a team that He has now. Brady has always been with New England and has always had a good team.
If Brady can come out with a W. I have mad props for him. But it would have to be off of the way the Seahawks are playing and if they are making mistakes or not.

First off i said best qb is determined by stats and wins not just wins. Also, Brady has always had a good team? Past 8 years their defense has been the worst in the league (except this year), and they still managed to make the super bowl 2 out of those 7 and the playoffs 7 out of 7. Also, if you could name me 2 players that were very good before coming to the patriots i would love to hear who because Brady wasnt supplied with a good team, he simply made a good team. Manning wasnt supplied with a good team, he still didn't even make a dominating empire or anything close to an empire.