Celtic Heroes

The Official Forum for Celtic Heroes, the 3D MMORPG for iOS and Android Devices

Re: Proposal for future unbanning votes

#12
I have some questions/concerns
A vote is initiated by an independent user; that is, a user not affiliated with the user in question. Affiliation includes, but is not limited to: being within the same clan; being related to the user; being coerced or bribed by the user.
There are some pretty big clans in lugh, and some clans tend not to like certain other clans. If the no same clan rule went into effect i could see instances where there would be few votes(if they were in a big clan), or a big against vote(if clans dont like each other). Consider removing the no same clan rule
people in the same clan can vote, but can't start the vote
[*]The voting must last no less than one week from the time of posting,
I personally think this is too long a time. I think it should be a week at most, because imagion how it would feel to have to wait that long as the banned person. Id say a time of 3-7 days is fair, anyone who is concerned with voting may shout in lugh, and tell their clans.
A shorter voting time lowers the reliability of the vote. 1 week may be too much for some, but not enough for others. For a user to be banned, they must have done something serious. 28 days seems proportional to me. I'm willing to drop to 21!
Votes must be in the format of +1 (denoting a 'for' vote), or -1 (denoting an 'against' vote). No discussion is permitted. Users participating in a discussion within the voting thread will forfeit their vote.
I think discussions could help the vote, it is always good to have view points from both sides when making a decision. Being within the vote will explain why they voted that way
My logic was that arguments within the vote can obscure the main voting stream and make it difficult to follow. I could say that each user may post once only with their vote and a description of their point of view? No discussion beyond that.
Should a majority 'against' vote occur, the user will remain banned from accessing Lugh. No user may initiate another vote for at least 2 calendar months after the closing date and time of the vote.
By accessing lugh, do you mean entering the world? Or just bossing?
whatever they're banned from - I'll make it clearer

If you could respond to these thatd be nice, thanks :)
See bolded parts - I've amended bits already :)

I've also added a clause saying that the user can't vote, ands few things on what the OP should include.
Image


Forum Rules | Avoid Naming and Shaming | The Important Stuff
Want me to read your post? Quote me!

Re: Proposal for future unbanning votes

#13
I have some questions/concerns
A vote is initiated by an independent user; that is, a user not affiliated with the user in question. Affiliation includes, but is not limited to: being within the same clan; being related to the user; being coerced or bribed by the user.
There are some pretty big clans in lugh, and some clans tend not to like certain other clans. If the no same clan rule went into effect i could see instances where there would be few votes(if they were in a big clan), or a big against vote(if clans dont like each other). Consider removing the no same clan rule.
I think he means the post initiating the vote can only be posted by someone outside the player-in-question's clan, and everyone can vote after it's been initiated.
Stop! Stop! Stop! You're going to take someone's eye out! Besides, you're saying it wrong. It's LeviOsa, not LevioSA.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests