I actually think the majority of foreigners weighing in has to the fact that Taranis has not had an active discussion in a long time.. Forum action on Taranis? Who doesn't want to see this!lol taranis has gotten so bad that people from different servers are coming in to support the fact that Aeons and Pride have ruined taranis.
Taranis has never been bad.. we have lots of great raid drops and solid strategies and turnouts (we killed Mordris in 10 minutes today), our endgame players are not riddled with stress, and instead of bickering over lock fights and ffa drama we reach for greater goals. Let the kids play in the mud, and the adults focus on achieving more than petty war.
And if anything, Benevolence (if they decide to get out of Farcrag and step up their KSing campaign) might be the one to "ruin Taranis". Three years of server peace, three years of minimal conflict and amazing growth, lost to ffa? I would bet most servers could not make peace in the way Taranis has, and we have no intention of disintegrating what we have built and gained.
I recomend looking at the clan rankings.. In total Pride and Aeon have around 65 players able to reach Proteus and Gelebron. Meanwhile Benevolence lacks Druids and Rangers.. Funny how generally those who support FFA over peace are those with the dps capabilities.Aeons and Pride will eventually get over thrown by another clan that's had enough of the bs rules...
So far the only rationale Benevolence has provided to change the rules stems from lies (all of which I have disproved). We are in no way forcing Benevolence to run their clan a certain way, and they are welcome to not have clan property rules if they so desire.
Benevolence is not the first clan to try and take down one or more of the endgame clans on Taranis.. Let's see:Better watch out Aeons and Pride. Once people come to their senses... Your fked
1. KingdomOfAlba (Directed at Versus - dominant clan alongside TheILLUMINATI)
2. vvvvVvvvv
3. Synergy
4. Prototypes (for a little bit - directed at Pride)
5. Nexus (for a little bit - directed at Pride)
5. Equilibrium (who actually has the same gens as Benevolence.. They returned from their year-long break)
6. Benevolence
What usually happens is a few underleveled hotheads (some are actually passionate for their cause, but most are not) decide to wreck some havoc, they condemn the endgame clans and ks mobs and for a while think the endgame clans fear them and can't sleep due to nightmares caused by these rebels, but after a while they see that their efforts don't change a thing - their raid boss ks attempts fail, the endgame clans are only getting stronger, and eventually the little band of rebels realize the injustice that despite how easy it looks on paper, it is just as difficult to send a peaceful server into ffa as changing an ffa server into peace. At this point we usually see the leaders of the rebel clan suddenly go inactive or transferring to another server, and a few months after this all began Taranis breathes a sigh of relief. Peace again at last.
How are we bullying them? We don't allow them to join raid boss rotations (which they condemn), we don't allow them to join camp groups (which they condemn), we do not spread lies (which they do to us), we do not threaten them (which they do to us), and we do not ks their elixirs (which they do to us). We are not bullying them, we simply are not changing any of our rules for them.Well done bullying a clan into disbanding because they stood up to you. It seems however that these new and normal players are going to overwhelm you, as any Clan like yours would be on other servers.
It takes approximately 650 elixirs (162.5 hours of constant grinding) to acheive level 220, not to mention getting gold for lux and finding pieces for quest armor/weapons (which for rogues is very pricey). Assuming Benevolence does not disband and they attract the support of every newcomer in Taranis, I predict that Aeon, Pride, ParadogZ, and Nexus will not have a problem with Benevolence becoming the dominant clan until at least 2017.
Well of course, just as we are astounded by the absurdness of FFA servers! Being in the USA, I think the command economy of China is absurd, but if I lived there I may have a different opinion. It is simply a difference of culture. As for us being selfish.. You have already read my counters to that claim, and if you want to discuss those I would happy to.Your clans are now the luaghing stock of CH, people on my server are already astounded at how absurd and selfish your clans are
To be honest, we are far more liberal and inclusive than most other servers. We don't exclude players from camping and bossing because they are not in the dominant clan, and anyone can join a clan and get raid drops. The only people excluded are those who either steal from the clans with property rules (the one person who was blacklisted by disrupting raid bosses has not played in years), and all they have to do to be re-included in camping and killing bosses is to return their stolen raid drops. How is that unreasonable? If they want to be in a clan without no clan property rule, then they can join one without that rule. If they are fine with that rule, then they can join one with it.OTM is also to blame in this, perhaps if they kept a closer eye on servers they could prevent clans like yours from limiting and excluding other players ability to play the game..
You said it yourself - unless everyone agrees. Everyone who joins Aeon agrees to the clan property rule, and those who don't are welcome to join another clan. Trock agreed to the rule (knowing he could leave and we would completely understand), joined the clan, attended bosses, received raid gear, and then left the clan and refused to return the gear. Now he is here spreading misinformation about our systems and rules.How dare any of you think that you should impose your "rules" on anyone. Unless everyone agrees you have no right