There as annoying as spell checker on iOS as I was writing this post


I wouldnt start with the assumption that we dont help lvling our druids, that will be a wrong basis to ur claim in the first place. I personally lvled my way to 220 with 2 druids almost always grouped with me. No one is angry, there is no tone in our comments.Woah, I see I pulled some aggro against me from my last comment.
Lemme see. I think you guys OVERREACTED a bit. Let's begin thinking. I typed 9 skills, which obviously no one may ever max at the same time. It is also obvious that no one will max all 6 wards against a raid boss that attacks with fire and pierce (this is an example).
As for the 'hardships' of levelling a druid, IF we all start caring less about efficiency per lix and accept a druid as a lvling partner, we may help our clan and server in the long term. Waste of plat helping level a druid? It is a waste of plat going to raids without druids too! Small investment earlier for a BIG profit later
Oh and CHILL!
Awesome bud! You are a great role model for the CH communityI wouldnt start with the assumption that we dont help lvling our druids, that will be a wrong basis to ur claim in the first place. I personally lvled my way to 220 with 2 druids almost always grouped with me. No one is angry, there is no tone in our comments.Woah, I see I pulled some aggro against me from my last comment.
Lemme see. I think you guys OVERREACTED a bit. Let's begin thinking. I typed 9 skills, which obviously no one may ever max at the same time. It is also obvious that no one will max all 6 wards against a raid boss that attacks with fire and pierce (this is an example).
As for the 'hardships' of levelling a druid, IF we all start caring less about efficiency per lix and accept a druid as a lvling partner, we may help our clan and server in the long term. Waste of plat helping level a druid? It is a waste of plat going to raids without druids too! Small investment earlier for a BIG profit later
Oh and CHILL!
The root of the problems ofcourse lies in a much deeper place than AoEs being strong, but as we all know, to make OTM fix a problem from it's root is nearly to impossible task.
Haha touché my friend...maybe it should be, their? They are?I hope your use of "there" was meant to be sarcastic while using a spell checker... Then again, it's not misspelled just misused.
AoEs in a game are fine,mahe issue I think lies with how often they're hitting and how hard. An AoE shouldn't be doing more damage than a singular spell due to the force of the spell being disbursed amongst a variety of people. Maybe an AoE should have the damage scaled down based off of how many people are absorbing the hit.
Example: AoE does 10k damage on one person targeted.
Damage scales down to 8500 damage when 5 people being hit.
Damage has a minimum hit of say 2k on a group of say 14 people or more.
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests