Celtic Heroes

Frid comes from a server where all warriors are expected to be tanks. He has never seen what a full dps warrior can do so you will have to excuse his ignorance on the matter.

Most druids on my server tend to pass on dg. They see that it is much more beneficial on rangers and rogues. I am curious on everyones thoughts if given out only in pieces. On arawn we dont give sets and share the drops between a much larger group. Does this change anything because all that i have read so far is based off of dg sets. What if it was only giving legs or helm or body alone. Would this change things?

Idk why ppl says that dg on mage and druid is bad..
Its very good. On both mage and druid according to me and the clannies that has them. They dont have issues with survivability nor issues with dps/heals/support.. only ones that im aware of getting crippled is the rogues, like alooot more than other classes.
The mix of dps/support rings and gear from endgame bosses are much better fot the casters IMO, its easier to keep maxxed skills on casters with DG than it is with rogues and substain high gear standards..

Frid comes from a server where all warriors are expected to be tanks. He has never seen what a full dps warrior can do so you will have to excuse his ignorance on the matter.

I know how to lock bosses, using 15 pures on a toon that wont ever be in lock group without that gear isn't worth it in my world.

Idk why ppl says that dg on mage and druid is bad..

I didn't say it's bad. Nobody has said it's bad. DG is quite clearly the best armour for every toon (except tanks).

As for Druid and Mages, I think they're both important to gear...aura will cut down on amount of Druids needed and as someone said earlier, the dmg boosts helps a lot on Gele crystals, but nothing will rival a ranger at end game so if you're gearing to win locks then definitely gear rangers and rogues for locking the bosses like Proteus, Necro and Mordris. Otherwise, all classes are benefiting from the aura at raids if you focus on improving dps as a whole and not just an 8 person lock group.

I'm happy for you that your server has little to no competition, sadly not everyone has such a dominant position in their respective worlds.

Frid comes from a server where all warriors are expected to be tanks. He has never seen what a full dps warrior can do so you will have to excuse his ignorance on the matter.

I know how to lock bosses, using 15 pures on a toon that wont ever be in lock group without that gear isn't worth it in my world.

Idk why ppl says that dg on mage and druid is bad..

I didn't say it's bad. Nobody has said it's bad. DG is quite clearly the best armour for every toon (except tanks).

Well I assumed it from the first post of this topic that Perl thought so. But maybe im wrong..

Dg in druid its very good
I heal any edl 6 solo and 215 6 in rage if you have
good tank(us concordiia have very good tanks) and prote base or prime.
In gele if you have 2 druids full dg you heal ez tank and you have more ppl for crystals and gele.
I no use any lix only energy if solo.

Touch 4415 (50)
Breath 2122 (50)
Bark 1337 (50)
Howling 4160 (50)

Seems very irrevelant, all dg armour is good in some aspect. Now on server to server it varies what you can do, and the play style is usually different so you adjust to that. On my server same as fridds it's very comp high and btw our closest thing to a set is a Druid, next closest is a mage hahaha. It's just prioritizing on what your given. Also depending on your main gear for mate and Druid if you jewelry alone plus hot bar can supply the points you need dg is viable.

Idk why ppl says that dg on mage and druid is bad..
Its very good. On both mage and druid according to me and the clannies that has them. They dont have issues with survivability nor issues with dps/heals/support.. only ones that im aware of getting crippled is the rogues, like alooot more than other classes.
The mix of dps/support rings and gear from endgame bosses are much better fot the casters IMO, its easier to keep maxxed skills on casters with DG than it is with rogues and substain high gear standards..

I totally agree with this.

While we use our dkp system to guide us who should get our DG sets, my own personal opinion according to the most benefit is:

Rangers, Mages, Druids, Rogues/DPS warriors.

TBH, the real boost to the Mage DG armor is not the added bonus to shards and bolt (which I love of course for daily play), but rather to the immense high focus, +ice and + fire, and what it does to your lures. You can notice a difference when a LoA or LoS that is around 1,400 is swapped out for one that is over 1,800. It's just grows exponentially when you have lots of melee types stabbing, shooting, and slashing. Just my two cents though.

Frid comes from a server where all warriors are expected to be tanks. He has never seen what a full dps warrior can do so you will have to excuse his ignorance on the matter.

Frid comes from a server where every pure is thought about in a strategic way and not gambled on to make a set, there is no sets on gwydion but there are at least 14-16 bps and gloves, we arnt privileged to have no comp so our classes and dps are split into 2 clans so that means any warrior we get has a high responsibility of needing to be a tank and know when to bash Gele and xtals if needed.

Maybe if there was no comp a dps warrior wouldn't be bad since it is one of the higher improvements to a single class like a mage is.

Dg sets do nothing in comp servers especially if that set goes inactive then the other group has 8 bp and gloves.