But then if you want agro but taunt warcry and shield bash take away you will never get kill even though u want agro this idea has not been thought through at all I mean as a rogue I go up start get hit few times but I have Druid an bam warrior comes keeps agro with maxed warcry taunt and shield bash I do most damage but ur saying he should get kill??! No I don't think I because I could want that agro but I would never beable to pull it off him this would make warriors miles over powered and there is only room for problems in this idea keep it simple it's not hard who ever has most agro at end gets 20% more points for group is more then enough give Druids buff which in increase att and bam a group with 3 dps 1 tank 1 Mage 3 Druids could easily get kill over 6 rogues maybe 7/8 even!
Are you fighting a mob you can kill by yourself? If you are doing the damage, but not getting attacked, there is no risk for you. It is easy to imagine that dps is the only measure, since we can see the boss die as a result. It is not the only measure or their would be no classes other than rogues.
We are suggesting an aggro/dps balanced calculation. It is important to understand that this balanced between the two and not one or the other. It is not just aggro. It is not just dps. If you agree their should be measures other than dps, how do you feel those might be included, if not this way? If you think dps is the only measure then you are saying that it should stay the way it is. The way it is devalues the efforts of all non-dps classes.