No Griefing Proposal - one Havoc's perspective
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 5:16 am
I'd like to add or help with your proposal so that it may one day actually serve as a rough guideline for the Morrigan frontier. First off, I get it..we are the Hatfields and McCoys. Bad blood, and both sides believe themselves to be the more righteous in this feud that overlays our coexistence. I'm not pointing fingers, and my tone will remain neutral out of respect for the forums and Muldar.
First - the first directive states that there is no such thing as griefing before lock is achieved. I think this should be changed to no griefing period, even during competition for lock. During lock all relevant dps toons should be focused on the target. If the door is left open to allow griefing during lock, it will be exploited. I don't think there should be any room for griefing in the no griefing agreement. If I have misinterpreted the first rule, then I do think that no griefing before or after lock should be emphasized.
Second - The second directive states that if a clan griefs after losing lock, the winning clan should get a free kill with no second lock battle. I do not disagree with this suggestion, but there is no supporting framework to this directive, and thus it is hard to agree to. Who decides if a grief occurs? How do we collect and determine sufficient proof that a grief took place? Would we have pre-appointed sheriffs in each clan approved by the opposing clan? How quickly would the call be made as the sought after spawn sits there? Without a process, it's just going to result in what we've seen in previous locked threads.
Lastly - how would we also then setup checks and balances to verify that what each clan is supposed to be doing, is happening to satisfaction of both sides? If there is a dispute that happens outside a lock and kill, how is that settled?
I honestly think any code of the server is going to require frequent communications between both sides. In absolute honesty, that is the greatest challenge here. We simply can't speak to each other yet without some sort of disapproving tone eminating from our words. Thanks for reading this, hope it sheds some kind of light of what may be on our minds when reading your proposal.
Aeslyn
Havoc
First - the first directive states that there is no such thing as griefing before lock is achieved. I think this should be changed to no griefing period, even during competition for lock. During lock all relevant dps toons should be focused on the target. If the door is left open to allow griefing during lock, it will be exploited. I don't think there should be any room for griefing in the no griefing agreement. If I have misinterpreted the first rule, then I do think that no griefing before or after lock should be emphasized.
Second - The second directive states that if a clan griefs after losing lock, the winning clan should get a free kill with no second lock battle. I do not disagree with this suggestion, but there is no supporting framework to this directive, and thus it is hard to agree to. Who decides if a grief occurs? How do we collect and determine sufficient proof that a grief took place? Would we have pre-appointed sheriffs in each clan approved by the opposing clan? How quickly would the call be made as the sought after spawn sits there? Without a process, it's just going to result in what we've seen in previous locked threads.
Lastly - how would we also then setup checks and balances to verify that what each clan is supposed to be doing, is happening to satisfaction of both sides? If there is a dispute that happens outside a lock and kill, how is that settled?
I honestly think any code of the server is going to require frequent communications between both sides. In absolute honesty, that is the greatest challenge here. We simply can't speak to each other yet without some sort of disapproving tone eminating from our words. Thanks for reading this, hope it sheds some kind of light of what may be on our minds when reading your proposal.
Aeslyn
Havoc