Celtic Heroes

Over the progress of time this game got ridiculous , The warrior has been nerfted too much to be fun anymore Is broken this is the kind of situation when ppl gets aggravated , ppl who got a main as warrior choose to be a warrior because was the class to be. And you invested and raised but now easily gets ks and never wins againts a rogue or ranger . A damage warrior againts a pure dps rogue or archer 10 or 20 lvls below him will get ks.

Tell me how is possible that 2 warriors in the same party lvl 143 and 131 gets ks easy by lonely ranger or rogue lvl 146 how weak and broken are the warriors and the funny parts we hold the aggro. I am Not upset about been ks. Been both damage warriors but how bad our class is now.

I own a fair amount of offhand and main hand weapons ( scavenger and diamond) and any combinations of weapons and ioffhand had try every build possible to be able to win a battle ( charms,rings,amulets,bracelets) nothing seens to be good we do cause a lot damage per hit but way to slow to win a battle. I know the was a class disparaty before. But we choose the best class why now we are being sacrifice making slow , the warrior is a broken good now you can only be a tank.

Warriors are supposed to hit less than rangers and rogues...

Over the progress of time the warrior has been nerfted too much to be able to be fun we get ks easy by rogues and rangers the are pure dps some times 20 lvls below us , why we are destinde to be only tanks we spend time and money to build warriors to get this bad.

How is possible the our weps are slow making our skills so slow to use, is agrravating any combination of stats , main weapons ,offhand,charms , bracelet will no win a kill again rogue or ranger, Make. It. A balance game no this ridiculous .
I know people complaint about the unbalance the was before but now the warrior is just a tank, who needs a lot healing to be able to kill anything .

This made little sense to me, sorry.

The developers have done an excellent job of better distinguishing class roles. A warrior should not be able to out dps a rogue of similar level. You cannot have it all. As a druid it would be absurd for me to ask to be able to do damage on par with a mage right? Warriors are super valuable. Really every class is amazing. You do get some wiggle room to chose more defensive or offensive orientations, but not to the extent that you can be on par with an offensive class. Warriors and Druids will (rightfully so) not be able to out damage a similar level Mage, Rogue, Ranger. But, those classes will never be able to tank as well as a warrior, or Heal and buff like a Druid.

If I am really reading into your message correctly, it is that you made your warrior during a time when you had the best of both worlds. Warriors could out damage rogues and also respec to be tremendous tanks. Now things have changed and rather than making a rogue if you want to be all out dps, you are upset because you have lost your offensive edge.

The developers have done an excellent job of better distinguishing class roles. A warrior should not be able to out dps a rogue of similar level. You cannot have it all. As a druid it would be absurd for me to ask to be able to do damage on par with a mage right? Warriors are super valuable. Really every class is amazing. You do get some wiggle room to chose more defensive or offensive orientations, but not to the extent that you can be on par with an offensive class. Warriors and Druids will (rightfully so) not be able to out damage a similar level Mage, Rogue, Ranger. But, those classes will never be able to tank as well as a warrior, or Heal and buff like a Druid.

If I am really reading into your message correctly, it is that you made your warrior during a time when you had the best of both worlds. Warriors could out damage rogues and also respec to be tremendous tanks. Now things have changed and rather than making a rogue if you want to be all out dps, you are upset because you have lost your offensive edge.

I got a druid and believe me if u get the rigth gear and abilities you can cause a lot damage The druid is perfect as is your choice if you be a healer or damage druid. You can choose how to play as druid .

we warriors cannot Choose you are tank or a tank and yes im upset as warrior because i Got nerfted when you start playing a year go you choose a class you pick it a class you choose to be a druid and complanit of disvantage your class have and the devs make u better , ok I choose to raise my warrior and druid over my rogue, ranger , mage. Because that was class to be. And inverted time and money on it , why a year later I got get fked just asking
Wait what so devs will refund me all the platinum and change all my gear and weapons to rogue. That way i can make a new rogue , in the bussines world i could sued for that when you change something the bad , better then what about the devs, Change my chart to a rogue with the same lvl and all warrior weps get fully refunded and all armor change to rogues or ranger i can live with that , the way i can enjoy it been fully dps , and dot feel like i waisted my time .

Warriors are supposed to hit less than rangers and rogues...

Not really , A warrior should stand a long battle and hit hard thats why is warrior so why we get aggro then let the heavy hitters get the aggro . Rangers got the choice to figth from a long distance and never get hit, Just beacuse all you pick the weak class at begginig doesnt mean we got get sacrifice .

The developers have done an excellent job of better distinguishing class roles. A warrior should not be able to out dps a rogue of similar level. You cannot have it all. As a druid it would be absurd for me to ask to be able to do damage on par with a mage right? Warriors are super valuable. Really every class is amazing. You do get some wiggle room to chose more defensive or offensive orientations, but not to the extent that you can be on par with an offensive class. Warriors and Druids will (rightfully so) not be able to out damage a similar level Mage, Rogue, Ranger. But, those classes will never be able to tank as well as a warrior, or Heal and buff like a Druid.

If I am really reading into your message correctly, it is that you made your warrior during a time when you had the best of both worlds. Warriors could out damage rogues and also respec to be tremendous tanks. Now things have changed and rather than making a rogue if you want to be all out dps, you are upset because you have lost your offensive edge.

More of a problem with mages than warriors. I get out DPS'd by TANK warriors 10 levels below me, and I am almost all out DPS mage.

Warriors are supposed to hit less than rangers and rogues...

Not really , A warrior should stand a long battle and hit hard thats why is warrior so why we get aggro then let the heavy hitters get the aggro . Rangers got the choice to figth from a long distance and never get hit, Just beacuse all you pick the weak class at begginig doesnt mean we got get sacrifice .

warriors aren't supposed to get the aggro from highest skill damage, they are supposed to get aggro from taunt.

Warriors are supposed to hit less than rangers and rogues...

Not really , A warrior should stand a long battle and hit hard thats why is warrior so why we get aggro then let the heavy hitters get the aggro . Rangers got the choice to figth from a long distance and never get hit, Just beacuse all you pick the weak class at begginig doesnt mean we got get sacrifice .

warriors aren't supposed to get the aggro from highest skill damage, they are supposed to get aggro from taunt.

Well i was not talking about bosses , but yes warriors hold aggro over. Taunt doenst work that well anymore is fixed must of the bosses ignore taunt so.

Fromen did you delete your previous post or someone else? I was responding to it and is said it didnt exist.