Celtic Heroes

The Official Forum for Celtic Heroes, the 3D MMORPG for iOS and Android Devices

Why does the horse mount seem so popular?

#1
For dps i definately like the wolf a lot more than the horse for dps. But i have seen a lot of people saying that they will get horse when it is released. What are peoples reasons for this? Is it based on apearance? Or is the appeal for a str/dex dps crushing damage skill mount really that much more apealing to so many?
Last edited by Ventius on Wed Sep 27, 2017 2:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Arawn
Ventius - level 227 ranger of dawn
Epona
Ventius - level 222 noob ranger of Enigma
Belenus
Ventius - level 163 druid

RIP badabing

Your newest blue name who has dreams to one day be purple

Re: Why does the horse mount seem so popular?

#3
90 str is such a small bonus, and crushing damage? Imo the wolf looks better too, the shading and colors on the horse seem rushed. I got a wolf for my mage as well, as the pierce damage skill seems like a nice bonus to a mages lack of physical damage.
Feel free to pm me about anything or talk to me in game :D
Bob The God
This Bob guy is a guide? Legitimately?
Former EG try hard who’s now relaxing midgame on crom.
Fire Mages are where its at

Re: Why does the horse mount seem so popular?

#4
90 str is such a small bonus, and crushing damage? Imo the wolf looks better too, the shading and colors on the horse seem rushed. I got a wolf for my mage as well, as the pierce damage skill seems like a nice bonus to a mages lack of physical damage.
True, crushing is worse than pierce and the colours are messed up. This was our first thought when we tried them in Beta, the T1/T2 and T3/T4 looks way too similar.

Re: Why does the horse mount seem so popular?

#6
90 str is such a small bonus, and crushing damage? Imo the wolf looks better too, the shading and colors on the horse seem rushed. I got a wolf for my mage as well, as the pierce damage skill seems like a nice bonus to a mages lack of physical damage.
True, crushing is worse than pierce and the colours are messed up. This was our first thought when we tried them in Beta, the T1/T2 and T3/T4 looks way too similar.
Ya :/
not sure why otm didn't just copy the previous horse template but then put bardings on them... Those horses were done really well, its a shame that the battle mount looks so rushed.
Feel free to pm me about anything or talk to me in game :D
Bob The God
This Bob guy is a guide? Legitimately?
Former EG try hard who’s now relaxing midgame on crom.
Fire Mages are where its at

Re: Why does the horse mount seem so popular?

#7
90 str is such a small bonus, and crushing damage? Imo the wolf looks better too, the shading and colors on the horse seem rushed. I got a wolf for my mage as well, as the pierce damage skill seems like a nice bonus to a mages lack of physical damage.
True, crushing is worse than pierce and the colours are messed up. This was our first thought when we tried them in Beta, the T1/T2 and T3/T4 looks way too similar.
Ya :/
not sure why otm didn't just copy the previous horse template but then put bardings on them... Those horses were done really well, its a shame that the battle mount looks so rushed.
Battle donkey

Re: Why does the horse mount seem so popular?

#9
It's a combination of appearance and lack of knowledge that crush isn't better than pierce as pierce lure is more common.

Mages should not waste pts into a crush lure just for battle mount skills that will rarely hit on raids. Since pierce lure is already there to multiply rogue and ranger damage then wolf skill will also be boosted WHEN it hits, which will be rare.
Wattzon of Sulis

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests