Page 1 of 2

which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:14 pm
by Impxswitchx
i just bought a full set of plate for alot of gold then i started seeing posts about a focus mage utilizing energy shield with max amounts of energy. my mage is still a relatively low level. which mage is gonna be more useful be sure to keep in mind the upcoming update with mobs up to level 80, my stats right now are 5.5.40.50. so should i go energy shield and use that as my health or max out my vitality? :?

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:19 pm
by Yesteryear
It depends on if you have the best pre update plate. If you do, I think Magicka can direct you into the best Battle Mage direction.
If not, I have a post for focus based Mages :).

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:24 pm
by Wolf
Pretty much all the info you need is posted in the two topics "vitality or focus" and "being a Mage is hard". Hope those help :)

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:14 pm
by Impxswitchx
i have looked at those topics and they helped alot, they were where i got the ideas for both typed of mages i hav pre update plate but some pieces are not the best. but i was still wondering with the new update and higher levels what would be best for future reference?

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:16 pm
by Impxswitchx
btw i also wanna mage that can solo bosses. :D

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:49 am
by Wolf
Well it depends what you like the tank Mage with lvl 10 lur of fire, cloak of fire and fireball ends Fights quickly because of it's low energy. With a boss, it deals heavy damge but runs out of energy quickly. With the ice Mage, ice shards deals high damage and then Average fireballs, so in a boss fight this Mage does damage for a longer period of time, but not in the magnitude of the other build.

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:24 pm
by Yesteryear
Wolf is right.
My build is made to do high burst damage. If I get hit, I rely on Energy Shield to keep me alive.

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 5:40 pm
by Impxswitchx
the only thing i wonder about with the ice mage is the casting time of ice shards it takes way too long and get interrupted too often, i think this would be a major hassle during a boss fight especially like the avatar... and btw whats the average amount of damage you guys do with your firebolt and lure of fire and then whats your fire magic ability im wondering at about what level ill be able to solo a simple boss like ducarius.

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 6:22 pm
by Wolf
With lvl 10 lure and lvl 10 firebolt I deal 250+ sometimes 350 on the high lvl mobs in the Avatar room. I went outside and tried it on a puppy lol. My highest hit in that five minutes was 1647 (just a little stat there) I'm getting off topic. There Is currently a glitch that allows fire mages to already pwn ducarius.

Re: which type of mage is officially better?!

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:49 pm
by Impxswitchx
and whats your fire magic level then?