Celtic Heroes

I wouldnt compare the nazis nor any other those types of dictators to a murderer, a murderer is a single person that can be fixed, ppl like the nazis are brainwashed and commited far more serious crimes.
Btw, I dont like how all posts here say 'Criminal' and bunch of negative things after that, I feel like this is a topic directed at me

You are Criminal ( with caps ) and we r talking about criminals ( without ) :p

Hey, I respect both Criminals with caps and criminals without caps.

EDIT: just went over posts, Istael u wrote 'Criminals' most of times (like 4, but good things ) and Swan wrote Criminals once, so I am hurt

Some people are in fact simply broken and it does no good to continue to 'rehab' them in the belief that they will someday do something other than what they have been doing which is usually killing, robbing..or you know...rape...molestation of some type...

kill them all. start fresh. if you mess these up you can always throw them away, more will come.

humans breed like rats...you're not in any danger of running out.

When I went to a universety program last year (im a sophomore now) I took lawyers course I had to made an essay and what Ive made was a death sentence to criminals who killed ppl by torturing, I think that those kind of ppl are simply insane and cant really get back into society (although in the essay I added a part talking about insanity and a rehab program, but it depends on the criminal himself) and they are nothing more but a danger to the ppl, as sad as it is sometimes its for the good.
As for 'simpler' crimes like theft and such, I dont think the person needs to be death sentenced but prisons in Israel offer such great conditions to criminals and terrorists that it feels like crime pays off.

If there will always be new criminals, how could it help to kill the first ones ?

They weren't the same caps x) they were in the beginning of a sentence and not the beginning of a name :p

I honestly support death penalties, however under very cetain circumstances:
-the murderer must be 100% guilty- unquestionable evidence (cameras), etc
-the murderer must have killed more than one human (it shows he has the potential to kill more humans, while killing one human would make a moral human restless and consumed with guilt)

Lets have an example, Rob, a generally content person finds his daughter dead. The murderer( we'll call him Charles Manson) is then taken into custody. It is found that Charles also killed Sharon Tate and he has a huge plan that would have killed 1,000 more, had he not been arrested. Should he live? Remember, this very instance you are sharing the country and the earth with brutal killers. I think death is also more humane in a way (ik you wanna argue, maybe humane isnt the right word- nothing that will come out of this discussion will lead to something more humane, unless we never have crime again), since giving them a sentence in prison, they are with people who could possibly be more insane or intimidating than themselves. Being sent to prison is pretty much a death sentence since their lives areretty much ruined after that. Their criminal record will stop them from having an average job or function like normal human beings, or having a life of their own. No torture, only death. Death should be the worst punishment we offer, who are we to say, "you deserve worse than death" ?

idk, it's a big dilemma, i dont wanna bring religion, but there has been a few mentions so i should just say that if you believe in heaven and hell, dont you think god will correctly correspond the murderer to heaven or hell, depending on where he/she should go?

topics tend to die after i post on a thread..

Swan never replied to my post, I'm still waiting for her !

PS: hey Rogue

Aaah this one..

I said I would join in but never did lol